Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > PSA Airlines
PSA or Republic (PHL Desired) >

PSA or Republic (PHL Desired)

Search

Notices
PSA Airlines Regional Airline

PSA or Republic (PHL Desired)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-20-2019, 07:12 PM
  #31  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 2,012
Default

Originally Posted by irrelevant
The difference isn’t 3.3%. It’s 53%.
Truth somewhere in between. Outside attrition is what really drives time to flow
ZeroTT is offline  
Old 05-20-2019, 09:10 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 428
Default

Originally Posted by ZeroTT
Truth somewhere in between. Outside attrition is what really drives time to flow
There is no “in between”. 9 is 50% greater than 6. Flow alone is roughly 53% higher at Piedmont. It’s fourth-grade math.

Regarding outside attrition, both carriers will likely experience roughly the same percentage of outside attrition, so that factor cancels out.

A ten year flow at PDT isn’t realistic, because it doesn’t account for outside attrition. Likewise, a 16-year flow at PSA isn’t realistic, for the same reason.

If half of PSA’s pilots leave outside the flow, that leaves 950/120 per year = 7.92 years for number 1,900 to flow.

If half of PDT’s pilots flow, that leaves 372/72 per year = 5.17 years for number 744 to flow.

That’s nearly three years’ difference. That’s what a 53% higher flow rate (considering pilot group size) does for PDT.

A new hire who chooses PDT over PSA, and who flows, is likely to spend nearly three more years at AA...three more years at $250k-$300k/year. This assumes no change in flow rates from present.

PDT’s flow is presently superior to PSA’s, and has been for a few years. Again, there are a lot of other factors to consider, but an extra $15k-$20k/year during one’s time at the regionals is nothing compared to an extra $250k/year at AA.
irrelevant is offline  
Old 05-20-2019, 10:07 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 310
Default

Originally Posted by irrelevant
There is no “in between”. 9 is 50% greater than 6. Flow alone is roughly 53% higher at Piedmont. It’s fourth-grade math.

Regarding outside attrition, both carriers will likely experience roughly the same percentage of outside attrition, so that factor cancels out.

A ten year flow at PDT isn’t realistic, because it doesn’t account for outside attrition. Likewise, a 16-year flow at PSA isn’t realistic, for the same reason.

If half of PSA’s pilots leave outside the flow, that leaves 950/120 per year = 7.92 years for number 1,900 to flow.

If half of PDT’s pilots flow, that leaves 372/72 per year = 5.17 years for number 744 to flow.

That’s nearly three years’ difference. That’s what a 53% higher flow rate (considering pilot group size) does for PDT.

A new hire who chooses PDT over PSA, and who flows, is likely to spend nearly three more years at AA...three more years at $250k-$300k/year. This assumes no change in flow rates from present.

PDT’s flow is presently superior to PSA’s, and has been for a few years. Again, there are a lot of other factors to consider, but an extra $15k-$20k/year during one’s time at the regionals is nothing compared to an extra $250k/year at AA.
Piedmont has the lowest outside attrition of line pilots of the three WO. Also has the Lowest % of apps on file with AA outside the flow. There’s a lot of turnover on the bottom of the list as NHs leave during the 11 month training delays. Only about 45-55% of each class remains in property through their first year flying the line currently. After that, outside flow attrition drops to 1 or 2 (max) pilots leaving outside the flow per month.

The five year flow at Piedmont Does not exist for new hires.

Do not come to Piedmont for a Philly area base unless you can’t get hired on at the following airlines:

Frontier
PSA
Republic

Each of the above will give better pay, scheduling and QOL. A 10 year flow is not worth coming to Piedmont.
Phoenix21 is offline  
Old 05-20-2019, 10:48 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 428
Default

I see. So PDT is a horrible place to work, and no one should go there, but no one at PDT wants to leave for better opportunities. It’s crystal clear to me now.
irrelevant is offline  
Old 05-21-2019, 01:57 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 310
Default

Originally Posted by irrelevant
I see. So PDT is a horrible place to work, and no one should go there, but no one at PDT wants to leave for better opportunities. It’s crystal clear to me now.
Piedmont is like a jam in traffic. At the front of the line the end is in sight so even though it’s slow moving it’s not too bad. In the middle the line is long and barely moving but there aren’t many options to get out and go another way. Towards the back end folks see how long the line is and how it’s barely moving and take alternate route as soon as they can.

When the flow was introduced PDT had less than 400 pilots and was going to take 5 years for new hires. Every 50-60 people since then has added a year to the flow. For a time Piedmont was supposed to get 175s, then instead 100+ 140/5s, which would have supported growth of he pilot group to increase flow. Those things didn’t materialize and aircraft completed at 60 and management has announced they intend to keep the pilot group its current 740-760 range.
Phoenix21 is offline  
Old 05-21-2019, 04:05 AM
  #36  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 2,012
Default

Yes the % of pilots flowed per year is simple arithmetic. The statistic produced isn’t particularly meaningful though.

If 20% of a seniority list leaves every year then the time to flow numbers are 26% vs 29%. If it’s 10% then it’s 16 vs 19. Very much makes a difference in how long hire to flow takes
ZeroTT is offline  
Old 05-21-2019, 05:25 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 428
Default

Originally Posted by Phoenix21
Piedmont is like a jam in traffic. At the front of the line the end is in sight so even though it’s slow moving it’s not too bad. In the middle the line is long and barely moving but there aren’t many options to get out and go another way. Towards the back end folks see how long the line is and how it’s barely moving and take alternate route as soon as they can.
This is no different than the scenario at PSA, or Envoy.

Originally Posted by ZeroTT
Yes the % of pilots flowed per year is simple arithmetic. The statistic produced isn’t particularly meaningful though.

If 20% of a seniority list leaves every year then the time to flow numbers are 26% vs 29%. If it’s 10% then it’s 16 vs 19. Very much makes a difference in how long hire to flow takes
I suspect you are relatively junior. Perhaps once you get in the top 300 or so on the seniority list, once outside attrition dries up, you’ll understand why a flow rate 50% lower than PDT’s makes a big difference. 20% of the top 300 are not leaving outside of the flow, and once you get within the top 200, there is nearly zero outside attrition. I imagine you believe you’re going to get the call from Delta as soon as you hit 1,000 hours P.I.C. - I sincerely hope you do.

You guys can carry on without further input from me. I’ve made enough effort trying to explain why 9% is 50% more than 6%, and how it matters. It’s not my job to change your personal reality.
irrelevant is offline  
Old 05-21-2019, 06:26 AM
  #38  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 2,012
Default

Originally Posted by irrelevant
This is no different than the scenario at PSA, or Envoy.



I suspect you are relatively junior. Perhaps once you get in the top 300 or so on the seniority list, once outside attrition dries up, you’ll understand why a flow rate 50% lower than PDT’s makes a big difference. 20% of the top 300 are not leaving outside of the flow, and once you get within the top 200, there is nearly zero outside attrition. I imagine you believe you’re going to get the call from Delta as soon as you hit 1,000 hours P.I.C. - I sincerely hope you do.

You guys can carry on without further input from me. I’ve made enough effort trying to explain why 9% is 50% more than 6%, and how it matters. It’s not my job to change your personal reality.
Where can I sign up to start top 20% seniority at Piedmont?
ZeroTT is offline  
Old 05-21-2019, 06:47 PM
  #39  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2018
Posts: 63
Default

Originally Posted by Urban achiever
Yeah I don’t know anyone who is happy with their decision to be a piedmonster.
"Piedmonster" LOL
ClearPr0p is offline  
Old 05-22-2019, 07:38 AM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 566
Default

Originally Posted by ClearPr0p
"Piedmonster" LOL
There are derogatory names for all of us, I'm sure:
SkyWorst
Brown Streak
Mesa
etc...
WhiteMorpheus is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Skyvector
PSA Airlines
215
03-17-2021 06:27 AM
KingAirpilot90
PSA Airlines
1925
06-20-2018 01:38 PM
midwestpilot
Regional
5
06-07-2018 11:01 AM
FlameNSky
Republic Airways
192
11-29-2015 07:32 PM
bigtime209
PSA Airlines
194
09-30-2013 12:45 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices