Search

Notices
Piedmont Airlines Regional Airline

Piedmont Life

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-10-2011, 03:35 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 936
Default

Originally Posted by Phuz
Dramatic? Haha.. No I don't think that is dramatic. Ask yourself how much turbine pic a guy getting hired today in 2011 is going to build when airplanes start timing out in 2012. It is disingenuous to convince these people of anything else because that is the reality as things stand today. Don't let the "hope" obstruct your vision of the big red blob of facts on the horizon.
So why are you still here? Lots of other airlines are hiring, why not get out now while you can?
dashtrash300 is offline  
Old 04-10-2011, 04:01 PM
  #12  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: FO
Posts: 45
Default

Thanks for all the encouragement guys. Any current new hire piedmont FO's have any knowledge about the interview like questions or what current approaches they use for the interview?
Wapilot23 is offline  
Old 04-10-2011, 05:32 PM
  #13  
Kerbal Rocket Surgeon
 
Phuz's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DTW 717A
Posts: 1,099
Default

Originally Posted by dashtrash300
So why are you still here? Lots of other airlines are hiring, why not get out now while you can?
First of all the thread isn't about me and my situation, its about what a new guy should or should not expect if he accepts an offer with PDT. Secondly, I'm not .

I've said my piece, the noobs can read it and make their own educated decisions.
Phuz is offline  
Old 04-11-2011, 08:45 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
higgi8f6's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DHC-8
Posts: 150
Default

So here are some facts about Piedmont Life and you can verify most of them here on APC.

When you compare pay, first year looks pretty good. We are one of the higher paid regionals for first year pay however it does not stay that way. Go and compare 3rd or 4th year FO pay to any other regional flying 50 seat aircraft and we start to fall pretty quickly. Also our CA are some of the lowest paid CA flying 50 seaters. Or 37 seat rate for CA (FOs are paid the same whether there are 37 or 50 seats) is decent but it still does not justify lower rates for 50 seaters. Most line holders don't notice it because almost all lines are built with 90 hrs. So expect long days. I've just completed 4 days in a row of 14+hrs of duty followed by 12hrs or less of rest. We have the fewest number of days off per month. Most regionals have 11 or 12 but Piedmont is 10. It's only saving grace in regards to 10 days off is we do receive 4 golden days (immovable days off) that can be requested but again it is only a request and the company is not obligated to comply. We do have a commuter clause but I believe (not a commuter) you have to list for 2 or 3 flights ahead of your scheduled start of duty and most bases only have 4 or 5 flights a day. In regards to commuting on reserve while we are discussing it, you may be assigned a trip on your first day a reserve with a 1500 report however the company still wants you in base for a 0500 start to your duty so even though chances are they won't call you, you still have to commute in and be available. I've heard of other regionals that once you are assigned a trip, that is your report. Non of this sit on call before reporting. Our vacation policy is decent if you are trying to get time off. We are assigned a block (either the 1-15 or 16-30 of each month) and can place our 5 days on any trip and get paid for the next 5 days and drop any trip it touches. For example, if you have 3 days off, a 4 day then another 3 days off then another 4 day, you get paid for the entire 1st 4 day and the 1st day of the following 4 day but both trips are dropping giving you a very large amount of time off. Also our travel benefits are pretty good. No yearly fee and no fees for domestic travel. International is unlimited just pay taxes. First class domestically is $20 and internationally is $100. We have the same seniority as mainline on standby and are one of the few regionals who can jumpseat internationally on American. Good luck with your decision but at least now here are some concrete facts instead of he said she said stuff.
higgi8f6 is offline  
Old 04-11-2011, 09:28 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: CL-65 / Gear Wrangler
Posts: 321
Default

2 words: IT SUCKS
Piedmonster is offline  
Old 04-11-2011, 09:38 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: Sideways in a sim
Posts: 435
Default

All airlines suck... some suck less in different areas and more in others... it's all about which areas you can deal with sucking more than others and which airline's suckiness coincides with your suckiness preferences...
Av8tion is offline  
Old 04-12-2011, 05:00 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
UCLAbruins's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: F/O- G-V/550
Posts: 1,163
Default

Originally Posted by Piedmonster
2 words: IT SUCKS
it might suck for someone with some experience, but not when your times are 800TT/ 250ME... when you're in that time bracket Piedmont is like NASA (as the thread starter's enthusiams shows)
UCLAbruins is offline  
Old 04-13-2011, 06:22 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DASH8AV8R's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: A320/321
Posts: 125
Default

The differance between NASA and Piedmont is that NASA has the smarts to Retire it's old Shuttle but we keep operating N906HA.
On a serious note, You will enjoy the Dash and will fly with some great people.
DASH8AV8R is offline  
Old 04-13-2011, 09:13 AM
  #19  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Posts: 7
Default

Piedmont has long been on my target of airlines for a first airline job. However, I'm beginning to have second thoughts about their future, and by extension, mine with them. They fly only for US Airways, have reduced fleet size significantly in recent years, have not made any credible plans to adopt a new equipment type, share and compete for regional service to US Air with 7 other regionals, and has apparently been unwilling to negotiate in good faith for a new pilot contract. Perhaps this all due to US Airways wanting/needing to position itself for a merger or sale, but it makes me more concerned about working for Piedmont, than say, one of the Pinnacle group of airlines, or even the Trans States Holdings group. Any thoughts?
Commander 112 is offline  
Old 04-13-2011, 09:21 AM
  #20  
N/a
 
naley70b's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 198
Default

Originally Posted by Commander 112
Piedmont has long been on my target of airlines for a first airline job. However, I'm beginning to have second thoughts about their future, and by extension, mine with them. They fly only for US Airways, have reduced fleet size significantly in recent years, have not made any credible plans to adopt a new equipment type, share and compete for regional service to US Air with 7 other regionals, and has apparently been unwilling to negotiate in good faith for a new pilot contract. Perhaps this all due to US Airways wanting/needing to position itself for a merger or sale, but it makes me more concerned about working for Piedmont, than say, one of the Pinnacle group of airlines, or even the Trans States Holdings group. Any thoughts?
Well you pretty much summed everything up here at ol' piedmonts. . . I think career progression at piedmonts is about as encouraging and realistic as... well... something that isn't very encouraging or realistic.
naley70b is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SongMan
Pilot Health
3
05-18-2008 05:42 PM
vagabond
Money Talk
1
05-15-2008 07:57 PM
usa3000go
Military
27
04-30-2008 05:32 PM
747Dog
Hangar Talk
1
07-01-2006 10:16 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices