Search

Notices
Piedmont Airlines Regional Airline

Mesaba or Piedmont?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-01-2007, 05:07 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: CRJ900/FO
Posts: 159
Default

Originally Posted by boeingt7
Also, those f/o's that fly the -900 definitely believe that they are a "step above" those on the Saab, this is one reason there is a lack of respect for these f/o's within the company and most will get a rude awakening when they try to upgrade into the Saab.
P.S. I'm not sure if this is true but a captain told me that while in Minneapolis for training atleast one crj f/o got fired because there was an argument between the -900 guys and the -200 guys on the shuttle bus to training. Which is extremely sad if true. Anyone else hear of this happening?
Some of those comments seem like unfair generalizations. Please remain conscious of the fact that not all FO's in the CRJ200/900 are not like the "tool bag" you mentioned. First of all, I didn't choose the CRJ200, it chose me. I'm grateful for the opportunity to fly it if only for the fact that I got MSP along with the 200 assignment. I don't go around flaunting the fact I'll be flying a jet. I'm just saying that it seems unfair to be bluntly characterized because (maybe) one individual acted like a jerk. For you to suggest not having any respect for us just because we fly CRJ is pretty lame. We are pilots just like you.

I have specifically heard the story you referenced...but, it sounded like story that some jealous SAAB FO created if nothing to rant about.

My classmates and I have been flipping switches for awhile now and I don't think it resembles anything like you described. It flies on autopilot for a reason because it flies it better than any jet jockey ever could. Believe me, the captains coming over from the SAAB are discovering their own challenges with the transition. Easier to fly? Well, I don't fly the SAAB and you don't fly the CRJ...so I guess we'll just have to see. I can tell you (though) that some of the captains find some of the systems on the CRJ more complicated even though the systems were designed to relieve the pilots of the extra workload they were so used to doing on the SAAB. Computers can be frustrating for some people.

SAAB and CRJ FO's make the same pay...therefore nothing to brag about and no reason to feel "above everyone else". It's true, you'll probably have a bigger paycheck than me if you fly more than me. But that's kind of unfair...since we only have 3 possible planes (200s) to fly (as of today). After May 2008, maybe that will change.

"Younger and funnier Captains" are on the SAAB? Man, everyone I've met at Mesaba has been great to work with. If any of the Captains have disrespect for me as a CRJ200 FO...I haven't met any of them. Hey, somebody has to be an FO in those things. I will admit that I felt some of the SAAB FOs maybe didn't feel like conversing with us during INDOC, but believe me...we're all going through the same challenges (albeit on different aircraft).
evh347 is offline  
Old 12-01-2007, 05:32 PM
  #42  
Gear handle manipulator
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: B-737 First officer
Posts: 246
Default

Originally Posted by Tinpusher007
Try explaining the relationship of Mesaba with NWA for everyone who has never heard of it. Also be ready to correct everyone who will undoubtedly confuse Mesaba with Mesa! The Saab training program definitely moves faster than the CRJ. I know plenty of guys and gals on the line already loving it.
Thats good to know......I'm definitely looking forward to it if it all works out. I would'nt be mad at all if I got the CRJ really, but the SAAB is what I really want. Here's a question, how many different cities does the SAAB serve out of MEM? I read somewhere (I believe on this forum) that they only serve 10 cities from there. Would a SAAB pilot based in MEM ever do any flying out of MSP or DTW as well?

....and come on guys.........we alll have the same goals, no need to argue. If pilot A likes the CRJ then that fine, and if B likes the SAAB, then thats fine. We all are trying to get to the majors (NetJets, Fed Ex, UPS..whatever) one day.

Jesse........
SmoothLanderJ is offline  
Old 12-01-2007, 05:39 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RJ85FO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Position: Lots and Lots of Days Off
Posts: 586
Default

Originally Posted by SmoothLanderJ
Thats good to know......I'm definitely looking forward to it if it all works out. I would'nt be mad at all if I got the CRJ really, but the SAAB is what I really want. Here's a question, how many different cities does the SAAB serve out of MEM? I read somewhere (I believe on this forum) that they only serve 10 cities from there. Would a SAAB pilot based in MEM ever do any flying out of MSP or DTW as well?

....and come on guys.........we alll have the same goals, no need to argue. If pilot A likes the CRJ then that fine, and if B likes the SAAB, then thats fine. We all are trying to get to the majors (NetJets, Fed Ex, UPS..whatever) one day.

Jesse........
The SF3 serves 13 cities directly from MEM. Basically, you will see all those in one month on the line. Regardless, each day of flying is different, but you will be quite familiar with your airports. MEM does have some SF3 trips that bridge through to DTW. MEM-TRI-DTW and beyond. Basically, on a 3-day, you might fly your middle in DTW. A MEM line holder will rarely, if ever, see MSP. MEM reserve or build-up might see MSP once a month or so.

DTW has by far the most diverse flying on the SF3 with bridges to MSP via CWA and MQT and to MEM via TRI. So, all-in-all, DTW is a see it all kind of base.
RJ85FO is offline  
Old 12-01-2007, 05:59 PM
  #44  
Gear handle manipulator
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: B-737 First officer
Posts: 246
Default

Originally Posted by RJ85FO
The SF3 serves 13 cities directly from MEM. Basically, you will see all those in one month on the line. Regardless, each day of flying is different, but you will be quite familiar with your airports. MEM does have some SF3 trips that bridge through to DTW. MEM-TRI-DTW and beyond. Basically, on a 3-day, you might fly your middle in DTW. A MEM line holder will rarely, if ever, see MSP. MEM reserve or build-up might see MSP once a month or so.

DTW has by far the most diverse flying on the SF3 with bridges to MSP via CWA and MQT and to MEM via TRI. So, all-in-all, DTW is a see it all kind of base.
Ok...sounds good to me...........thanks for the info...........
SmoothLanderJ is offline  
Old 12-01-2007, 08:59 PM
  #45  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: Captain
Posts: 90
Default

Originally Posted by starvin marvin
PDT is closing their SYR base, FWIW... I believe that's ~40 pilots or so that are going to be displaced. I have my own ideas what that'll mean for PDT in the coming months, do the math.
hmm, quite a point you make there, maybe I should go to xj...oh wait.
N42ER is offline  
Old 12-02-2007, 09:11 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RedBaron007's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: E-190 Leftist
Posts: 300
Default

Originally Posted by Squawk_5543
Mesaba = Upgrade almost as soon as you have the time (right now it's literally like 2 or 3 months), future looks very bright, lots of growth, lot's of movement, new airplanes coming online, new routes starting every month,flow through w/ NWA should be kicking off 01/08 with 3/mo until 09/08 jumps to 9/mo.

Peidmont = Upgrade non-existant or years and years, no new airplanes or growth expected, future unknown........
Just for what it's worth....it looks like Piedmont's upgrade time is going to be coming down very quickly in the next few months, and there is talk of new airplanes. Obviously none of that is set in stone, but don't let everyone tell you that Piedmont is a worthless place. There are better, but there are a lot worse. I don't know a whole lot about Mesaba, but things COULD get a lot better at Piedmont soon. We're all praying for the Q400s...and like I've said in earlier posts. Upgrade times are going to be coming down due to the 100 pilots being preferentially hired by mainline.

If you are interested in some of Piedmont's bases, it might be a consideration. The Dash is a great airplane to fly too.
RedBaron007 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cessnadriver
Regional
27
11-16-2007 07:10 PM
dash trash
Regional
1
02-27-2006 07:50 PM
CRM1337
Regional
2
10-14-2005 05:07 AM
saab340driver
Regional
0
10-03-2005 01:41 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices