Search

Notices
Piedmont Airlines Regional Airline

Piedmont Airlines News & Rumors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-14-2019, 07:48 AM
  #4391  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 310
Default

Originally Posted by ninerdriver
OK, folks... name an airline that recently took just the money and didn't receive a staffing rush shortly thereafter.
You can’t, that’s the point. Getting bodies in class is a measurable metric that regional airline management cares about. They don’t care about retention because especially on the regional level, newer employees are cheaper than employees with more tenure and they have the ability to turn DEC programs on an off as needed. Whenever there’s an issue of folks leaving universally, the management go to solution is to flash more cash to get more bodies in the door without consideration to what, more expensive, fixes could be made to keep folks on property.

Union leadership should have engaged management for items beyond the pay raise. If they didn’t, those things would never just come as a gift in the next few months, especially at Piedmont. The earliest they would come would be at the conclusion of contract negotiations that start in 2023 when the Union negotiated for them. It’s the Union leaderships job to look out for interests as a pilot group and negotiate for more. This was the perfect time to do so. Theres no reason they should have been complicit in kicking the QOL down the road another five plus years (half of the pilot group on property now would never see the improvements then) when the opportunity to negotiate for improvements presented themselves now.

The Union leadership made the right call in this situation.
Phoenix21 is offline  
Old 05-14-2019, 07:52 AM
  #4392  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Posts: 52
Default

Originally Posted by 123494
The QOL improvements you're looking for will not happen overnight. The Company has repeatedly said the inefficient schedules exist because of the airports we serve, frequency of flights, and the short flights PDT does. Our ALPA has full access to scheduling software the Company uses and can produce little improvement. Ask yourself, as Year 2/3 CA, how it feels to park next to PSA knowing you're making $15-20 less per hour than they are. Class sizes are keeping up with the current hiring needs, so there is no need for any other improvements in their eyes. The pay increase is all that is needed to attract enough new hires and can prevent just enough outside attrition to run the operation. I feel I am treated well here and accepting this pay raise is a no brainer.
Ask yourself why the company management wants us to take the money so bad. It’s because they know they are scraping the bottom of the barrel and they cannot recruit. If we take just the pay then recruiters can lie and say oh ya we get the same as PSA. A CFI doesn’t understand what a blended rate is, what a min day is, what trip averaging means.

If we take just the pay rates you realize that you will still make less then your peer at PSA, right? You realize they still have way way better schedules? Put down the kool aid, go talk to a PSA pilot and ask to see their schedules.
surfcc11 is offline  
Old 05-14-2019, 08:17 AM
  #4393  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 310
Default

Originally Posted by 123494
The QOL improvements you're looking for will not happen overnight. The Company has repeatedly said the inefficient schedules exist because of the airports we serve, frequency of flights, and the short flights PDT does. Our ALPA has full access to scheduling software the Company uses and can produce little improvement. Ask yourself, as Year 2/3 CA, how it feels to park next to PSA knowing you're making $15-20 less per hour than they are. Class sizes are keeping up with the current hiring needs, so there is no need for any other improvements in their eyes. The pay increase is all that is needed to attract enough new hires and can prevent just enough outside attrition to run the operation. I feel I am treated well here and accepting this pay raise is a no brainer.
Go sit next to a PSA pilot of similar seniority and compare schedules. It’s been done and they regularly can get 16-18 days off compared to 11 and credit 10-20+hours more than Piedmont Pilots at the same seniority.

Comparing the old rates, at the end of the year a Piedmont pilot has to have an average of 9 days off a month (with two days of triple) at the same seniority to make the same amount of money as a PSA pilot averaging 16 days off a month.

Previous a PDT pilot had work 3 more months a year (1 week extra per month for 12 months) to be on par with a PSA pilot pay wise. With their new rates, it may not even be possible to match a PSA pilots pay working 3+ months worth of days more per year.
Phoenix21 is offline  
Old 05-14-2019, 08:19 AM
  #4394  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Apr 2019
Posts: 19
Default

Originally Posted by 123494
The QOL improvements you're looking for will not happen overnight. The Company has repeatedly said the inefficient schedules exist because of the airports we serve, frequency of flights, and the short flights PDT does. Our ALPA has full access to scheduling software the Company uses and can produce little improvement. Ask yourself, as Year 2/3 CA, how it feels to park next to PSA knowing you're making $15-20 less per hour than they are. Class sizes are keeping up with the current hiring needs, so there is no need for any other improvements in their eyes. The pay increase is all that is needed to attract enough new hires and can prevent just enough outside attrition to run the operation. I feel I am treated well here and accepting this pay raise is a no brainer.
I agree with this^

I knew what i signed up for. Yes I get angry sometimes, but if you live in base this is not a bad gig.
A Manikin is offline  
Old 05-14-2019, 08:20 AM
  #4395  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 894
Default

Originally Posted by surfcc11
Ask yourself why the company management wants us to take the money so bad. It’s because they know they are scraping the bottom of the barrel and they cannot recruit. If we take just the pay then recruiters can lie and say oh ya we get the same as PSA. A CFI doesn’t understand what a blended rate is, what a min day is, what trip averaging means.

If we take just the pay rates you realize that you will still make less then your peer at PSA, right? You realize they still have way way better schedules? Put down the kool aid, go talk to a PSA pilot and ask to see their schedules.
Again, our schedules differ than PSA largely due to our route structure, bases, and the aircraft we fly. A rational pilot flying a 50 seater should not expect to make what a pilot flying a -900 makes. Changes to min day, rigs, etc. take time to implement. So much so that many of our pilots will be long gone by the time they're agreed upon. Also, spend some time talking to PSA pilots and you'll soon realize things aren't as great as you think they are. PDT pilots need to realize they do not have as much leverage as they think they have.
123494 is offline  
Old 05-14-2019, 08:25 AM
  #4396  
Porco Rosso
 
ninerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 2,522
Default

Originally Posted by Phoenix21
You can’t, that’s the point. Getting bodies in class is a measurable metric that regional airline management cares about. They don’t care about retention because especially on the regional level, newer employees are cheaper than employees with more tenure and they have the ability to turn DEC programs on an off as needed. Whenever there’s an issue of folks leaving universally, the management go to solution is to flash more cash to get more bodies in the door without consideration to what, more expensive, fixes could be made to keep folks on property.
Agreed. Those who say raise wages now and wait for staffing problems to continue aren't going to see staffing problems continue.
ninerdriver is offline  
Old 05-14-2019, 08:25 AM
  #4397  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Position: 175 CA
Posts: 1,285
Default

Originally Posted by ninerdriver
OK, folks... name an airline that recently took just the money and didn't receive a staffing rush shortly thereafter.
Expressjet

They are still losing pilots month over month. Trying to hire 500 this year, net like negative 60 or something.
Varsity is offline  
Old 05-14-2019, 08:39 AM
  #4398  
Porco Rosso
 
ninerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 2,522
Default

Originally Posted by Varsity
Expressjet

They are still losing pilots month over month. Trying to hire 500 this year, net like negative 60 or something.
...versus net negative 300+ in the second half of 2018.
ninerdriver is offline  
Old 05-14-2019, 08:43 AM
  #4399  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Posts: 52
Default

Originally Posted by 123494
Again, our schedules differ than PSA largely due to our route structure, bases, and the aircraft we fly. A rational pilot flying a 50 seater should not expect to make what a pilot flying a -900 makes. Changes to min day, rigs, etc. take time to implement. So much so that many of our pilots will be long gone by the time they're agreed upon. Also, spend some time talking to PSA pilots and you'll soon realize things aren't as great as you think they are. PDT pilots need to realize they do not have as much leverage as they think they have.

I do talk to PSA pilots. Our QOL isn’t even in the same ballpark. You can believe all the management excuses you want but it doesn’t change the fact we have the least flexible worst credit schedules of any regional. Giving management the recruiting tool of a pay raise will slow the process down of making industry standard changes around here.
surfcc11 is offline  
Old 05-14-2019, 08:55 AM
  #4400  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Position: millennium falcon navigator
Posts: 107
Default

even when we had reserves and staffing five years ago the qol sucked. SF may be out of the picture but the mentality of sby is the same. You cannot change the way sby thinks after 30 odd years. SF once said that he wanted pilots away from home as much as possible which is why the schedules are so bad. He has been gone for two years and qol hasn’t improved much at all. Thinking that we have leverage or that we can change the way management runs this airline is idiotic. Until everyone in sby management changes PDT is going to say the same.
just my 2 cents
Bampilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 07:59 AM
stoki
Regional
11227
04-26-2017 09:03 AM
Cruise
Spirit
10507
12-01-2016 01:52 PM
vagabond
Aviation Law
10
09-20-2008 01:50 PM
UnlimitedAkro
Major
60
03-11-2008 01:14 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices