Piedmont Airlines News & Rumors
#4171
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Position: Sitting and waiting
Posts: 443
#4172
Line Holder
Joined APC: Nov 2014
Posts: 61
It'll happen. Just don't expect anything earth shattering this time around. You'll get the money, you'll prob get one or two QOL improvements. Increase in flow? Almost certainly won't happen. Scheduling? Nothing you can do about that until either larger aircraft show up or aag downgrades regional aircraft size on longer legs. I could care less if you believe me but I know what I'm talking about unlike a number of people that think you will have similar work rules as aag. You guys are expendable don't forget that. They will crush you to prove a point to envoy.
An airline that offers only four day trips with your network is not structured correctly. You need a mix of 1, 2, 3 and 4 day trips. You are actually structured for one and two day trips more than any other type.
Last edited by Heavy Hive; 04-29-2019 at 06:27 PM.
#4173
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Position: It has wings and I sit left.Sometimes.
Posts: 181
Piedmont is going to crush it's pilots? Give me a break. Do you have any idea how many planned retirements are taking place at AA yearly? And that doesn't even include the huge number of medical outs. They cannot afford to lose any of you in this era. 20 % of the AA PHL based pilots retire this year, and it goes to 30% next year and subsequent years. CLT is almost as bad. The number this year is over 900 PLANNED retirements.
An airline that offers only four day trips with your network is not structured correctly. You need a mix of 1, 2, 3 and 4 day trips. You are actually structured for one and two day trips more than any other type.
An airline that offers only four day trips with your network is not structured correctly. You need a mix of 1, 2, 3 and 4 day trips. You are actually structured for one and two day trips more than any other type.
#4174
Where is my weekends off?
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: A320
Posts: 327
#4175
Line Holder
Joined APC: Nov 2014
Posts: 61
Hopefully you push too hard and lose even more pilots.
Last edited by Heavy Hive; 04-29-2019 at 06:54 PM.
#4176
Line Holder
Joined APC: Nov 2014
Posts: 61
I'm going to say something that won't be a popular opinion but I'd be willing to bet it's accuracy.
1: Take the money
2. It is possible to get a cpl extra hotel nights if the company decides to respond to the offer your NC made at a session that was just about pay. Prob a good move.
3. Schedules, they will not improve until you're flying larger stage lengths. Your schedule comm has access to everything and if they can't improve them as they are now you're SOL.
4. If the pay raises are not accepted 1 of 2 things will happen. First is a merger with Envoy which would increase flow times for everyone and you'll be at current pay til a joint list and cba are concluded. Prob 2 year process. Second and I consider most likely is without the staffing increasing but decreasing bc of the pay, pdt will transfer aircraft to a 3rd party airline or airlines until the operation no longer makes sense. That is the least expensive and less headache for AAG option thus the most likely outcome
Again just my educated opinion.
1: Take the money
2. It is possible to get a cpl extra hotel nights if the company decides to respond to the offer your NC made at a session that was just about pay. Prob a good move.
3. Schedules, they will not improve until you're flying larger stage lengths. Your schedule comm has access to everything and if they can't improve them as they are now you're SOL.
4. If the pay raises are not accepted 1 of 2 things will happen. First is a merger with Envoy which would increase flow times for everyone and you'll be at current pay til a joint list and cba are concluded. Prob 2 year process. Second and I consider most likely is without the staffing increasing but decreasing bc of the pay, pdt will transfer aircraft to a 3rd party airline or airlines until the operation no longer makes sense. That is the least expensive and less headache for AAG option thus the most likely outcome
Again just my educated opinion.
A merger with Envoy makes zero sense. It makes a fiasco like what happened at PSA last summer all the more probable.
Last edited by Heavy Hive; 04-29-2019 at 07:00 PM.
#4177
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2018
Posts: 564
We are definitely in a completely different environment that 2011 through 2014... I know the company we're a@@ clowns during that.
A lot has changed at pdt since, but there are several manager players still on board from that time. Plus we all know LH is a master union buster.
Right now the pilot group is only thinking 3 to 6 years ahead as that's all people will be here. No one.. is expecting to be a lifer. We have interesting times ahead. AAG has interesting times ahead.
Even if a merger came around, it would take several years for contracts to merge and a single FAA cert to be issued. The current CBA would govern and therefore the flow would remain. Just like the guys that flowed into delta years back.
#4178
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2017
Posts: 1,117
In my opinion, no regional wholly owned or otherwise is immune to a downsize or merger. I don’t think its going to happen, because I think American finds value in all of the wholly owneds, but to think youre 100% immune to downsizing even in this environment is a bit naive. Just bein honest. Barely a year and a half ago... it only took American 3-4 months to completely get rid of Air Wisconsin. Not downsize. 100% disappear. I think most of the flying went to PSA and Piedmont, and maybe a little to Envoy. I didn’t notice any hiccups. They probably could have done it much faster if they wanted to.
Again, I don’t think thats going to happen. I honestly believe and hope Piedmont will see some improvements. I’m just trying to put things in perspective. We don’t quite have all the leverage we think we do. AA will pay the wholly owneds what they think will get people in the door and keep attrition manageable... and not a penny more.
Again, I don’t think thats going to happen. I honestly believe and hope Piedmont will see some improvements. I’m just trying to put things in perspective. We don’t quite have all the leverage we think we do. AA will pay the wholly owneds what they think will get people in the door and keep attrition manageable... and not a penny more.
#4179
New Hire
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 616
Perfect example of a planted stooge for your management. Notice all the downside if you don't " take the pay" This is a typical F&H empty threat scenario.
A merger with Envoy makes zero sense. It makes a fiasco like what happened at PSA last summer all the more probable.
A merger with Envoy makes zero sense. It makes a fiasco like what happened at PSA last summer all the more probable.
#4180
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2018
Posts: 564
In my opinion, no regional wholly owned or otherwise is immune to a downsize or merger. I don’t think its going to happen, because I think American finds value in all of the wholly owneds, but to think youre 100% immune to downsizing even in this environment is a bit naive. Just bein honest. Barely a year and a half ago... it only took American 3-4 months to completely get rid of Air Wisconsin. Not downsize. 100% disappear. I think most of the flying went to PSA and Piedmont, and maybe a little to Envoy. I didn’t notice any hiccups. They probably could have done it much faster if they wanted to.
Again, I don’t think thats going to happen. I honestly believe and hope Piedmont will see some improvements. I’m just trying to put things in perspective. We don’t quite have all the leverage we think we do. AA will pay the wholly owneds what they think will get people in the door and keep attrition manageable... and not a penny more.
Again, I don’t think thats going to happen. I honestly believe and hope Piedmont will see some improvements. I’m just trying to put things in perspective. We don’t quite have all the leverage we think we do. AA will pay the wholly owneds what they think will get people in the door and keep attrition manageable... and not a penny more.
Pdt has taken 60 planes but we only have 460ish line pilots that can fly them.
AAG has problems... pay us and treat us fair and PDT will continue 50 seat lift that AAG requires. Merge us and cause one more problem that dfw has to manage. Reduce/kill PDT, find another airline ready to take 240 flights per day.
Let's all relax, let the NC do what they can and talk to your reps so they know how you feel. Everyone has their own thoughts, opinions, wants and needs.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post