Piedmont Airlines News & Rumors
#3151
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: Gear slinger
Posts: 2,980
If you had somebody refer you, have them contact one of the recruitment team members to make sure they received your application and it’s complete. Otherwise follow up yourself via an email to [email protected].
#3152
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: Gear slinger
Posts: 2,980
PDT didn’t really start hiring until 2016 after AA bumped up the pay/bonuses to after lagging the rest of the industry and not being able to fill classes. Since then every new hire class has increased the flow time 1.5-3.5 months for NHs depending on size.
Piedmont has been around for quite a while (1930s as Henson flying service and 1960s as Henson Airline). As long as AAG can exercise cost efficiency in its operations Piedmont and the other WO will continue to exist.
#3153
New Hire
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 616
#3154
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Posts: 212
Piedmont Airlines News & Rumors
Fixed that for you.
The best-laid plans...
But there are also those pilots (hopefully not you) that is willing to screw over an entire industry (including themselves) to get ahead. Speaking of those picking up not double, or single premium, but STRAIGHT time! And if it wasn’t bad enough screwing the FOs out of triple, they upgraded and are now going to screw over all the CAs.
I understand you want your 1000 hours ASAP to upgrade and then want your 1000 PIC to meet that “magical marketable/desirable” number you were told to believe in.
First, The top isn’t worth it if you got there by stepping on everyone else to get to the top.
Second, there are thousands of 1000 PICs out there who haven’t got picked up, stop flattering yourself (in the general sense).
The company isn’t going to pay single or double or triple, if you (general) are desperately picking up straight time. I can slightly understand how you things can come up, and you need some cash, and you pick up single or double OCASSIONALLY. And I know we can't make a concerted effort to only pick up triple. But if we all realized on our own, that triple is the only amount worth it, it would be better for us all. But to not even be making any more money, just picking up time?! Seriously!?! You/we are worth much more than that too. Have a bit more respect for yourself and your profession than that.
/rant.
Not so much with this. Those flowing now are 2013 hires, so <6 years to flow, decreasing to 4 years for the ‘15-‘16 hires. Then going back up again to 10+ years for the ‘18 hires.
Last edited by Flyinguy; 01-08-2019 at 10:32 AM.
#3155
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: Gear slinger
Posts: 2,980
You’re welcome to double check the math...last early Jan 2016 hire is about 164 away from flow...
164/60 =
164/72 =
It’s actually surprising how many PDT pilots don’t know how long they have to flow using the math. They just take the 5 year flow the recruiters told them and subtract how long they’ve been on property and assume what’s left is how long they have to leave.
#3156
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Posts: 212
You’re welcome to double check the math...last early Jan 2016 hire is about 164 away from flow...
164/60 =
164/72 =
It’s actually surprising how many PDT pilots don’t know how long they have to flow using the math. They just take the 5 year flow the recruiters told them and subtract how long they’ve been on property and assume what’s left is how long they have to leave.
164/60 =
164/72 =
It’s actually surprising how many PDT pilots don’t know how long they have to flow using the math. They just take the 5 year flow the recruiters told them and subtract how long they’ve been on property and assume what’s left is how long they have to leave.
The first '15 is 141.
141-90=51
51/72=.7
So 8 months from now, which is Aug 2019, from Jan 15= 4y 8m.
Mid 15' is the best at 159
159-90=69
69/72= .95
Just June '15 being the optimal at 4y 6 m.
The first '16 hire is 237
237-90=147
147/72=2
2 years form now being Jan 2021. Exactly 5 years to flow (hence the flow going back up comment I made)
But all of that is strictly from 6/m flow. There is outside attrition, which does reduce the higher you get as many are too close to flowing to get their apps out there, and since we already ruled out the retirements in that "90" number. It still happens, and can push you a month or so forward.
Yea, for the first 1-3 years, the ones up top were unknown, might flow, might not. But that is pretty set in stone now, if you haven't gone yet, you aren't going to.
But it read to me like you were saying there are 160 pilots who have been here for 10 years and are still 2 1/4 away from flowing? That is greatly incorrect. Maybe I was reading you post wrong. Like I said, 2013s have flowed already, they haven't been here 10 years yet, nor will they.
Last edited by Flyinguy; 01-08-2019 at 10:57 AM.
#3157
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: Gear slinger
Posts: 2,980
So number 90 just flowed right? It seems to me you are forgetting that in your math?
The first '15 is 141.
141-90=51
51/72=.7
So 8 months from now, which is Aug 2019, from Jan 15= 4y 8m.
Mid 15' is the best at 159
159-90=69
69/72= .95
Just June '15 being the optimal at 4y 6 m.
The first '16 hire is 237
237-90=147
147/72=2
2 years form now being Jan 2021. Exactly 5 years to flow (hence the flow going back up comment I made)
But all of that is strictly from 6/m flow. There is outside attrition, which does reduce the higher you get as many are too close to flowing to get their apps out there, and since we already ruled out the retirements in that "90" number. It still happens, and can push you a month or so forward.
Yea, for the first 1-3 years, the ones up top were unknown, might flow, might not. But that is pretty set in stone now, if you haven't gone yet, you aren't going to.
But it read to me like you were saying there are 160 pilots who have been here for 10 years and are still 2 1/4 away from flowing? That is greatly incorrect. Maybe I was reading you post wrong. Like I said, 2013s have flowed already, they haven't been here 10 years yet, nor will they.
The first '15 is 141.
141-90=51
51/72=.7
So 8 months from now, which is Aug 2019, from Jan 15= 4y 8m.
Mid 15' is the best at 159
159-90=69
69/72= .95
Just June '15 being the optimal at 4y 6 m.
The first '16 hire is 237
237-90=147
147/72=2
2 years form now being Jan 2021. Exactly 5 years to flow (hence the flow going back up comment I made)
But all of that is strictly from 6/m flow. There is outside attrition, which does reduce the higher you get as many are too close to flowing to get their apps out there, and since we already ruled out the retirements in that "90" number. It still happens, and can push you a month or so forward.
Yea, for the first 1-3 years, the ones up top were unknown, might flow, might not. But that is pretty set in stone now, if you haven't gone yet, you aren't going to.
But it read to me like you were saying there are 160 pilots who have been here for 10 years and are still 2 1/4 away from flowing? That is greatly incorrect. Maybe I was reading you post wrong. Like I said, 2013s have flowed already, they haven't been here 10 years yet, nor will they.
I used #81 since since Jan/Feb flows have been announced but haven’t left yet and picked the last person hired whose been on property greater than three years (Jan 4 2016 @# 244). I think we’re on the same page, just used different snapshots/starting points for our #s. It would be swell if the union actually kept track of flow dates, or the company published the flow tracker the CPs have had access to in the past, but alas here we are.
Flow worked out great for the 2015 hires.
For new hires considering PDT, flow is now approximately 10 years and should be lowest on their list of considerations when deciding whether or not to come to PDT vs going to another airline.
#3158
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 226
My math was in response to the off the wall statement by [MENTION=79601]skytrails[/MENTION] that NHs can expect to not be on property for more than a few years at PDT Not only are there plenty of folks on property past the 3 year mark at PDT, the last of them still has over two years to flow.
I used #81 since since Jan/Feb flows have been announced but haven’t left yet and picked the last person hired whose been on property greater than three years (Jan 4 2016 @# 244). I think we’re on the same page, just used different snapshots/starting points for our #s. It would be swell if the union actually kept track of flow dates, or the company published the flow tracker the CPs have had access to in the past, but alas here we are.
Flow worked out great for the 2015 hires.
For new hires considering PDT, flow is now approximately 10 years and should be lowest on their list of considerations when deciding whether or not to come to PDT vs going to another airline.
I used #81 since since Jan/Feb flows have been announced but haven’t left yet and picked the last person hired whose been on property greater than three years (Jan 4 2016 @# 244). I think we’re on the same page, just used different snapshots/starting points for our #s. It would be swell if the union actually kept track of flow dates, or the company published the flow tracker the CPs have had access to in the past, but alas here we are.
Flow worked out great for the 2015 hires.
For new hires considering PDT, flow is now approximately 10 years and should be lowest on their list of considerations when deciding whether or not to come to PDT vs going to another airline.
#3160
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Posts: 264
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post