Search

Notices
Part 91 and Low Time Jump pilots, crop dusting, and other Part 91 jobs

Light cargo flight jobs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-19-2013, 06:55 PM
  #1  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
MercuryBirdman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: Boeing E-6B Flight Test Flight Engineer
Posts: 44
Default Light cargo flight jobs

Does anyone know if there is a need or market to fly light cargo, like documents and other such light cargo? For example I remember hearing about pilots flying checks around. I know this doesn't need to be done anymore. I think, but just using that as an example. Also, what FAR would that fall under if there was such a market. Seems like it could be Part 91. Could it be profitable enough to pay for the cost of owning/operating a light ASEL plane like a Piper/Cessna? Anybody with knowledge or experience in this, please share.
MercuryBirdman is offline  
Old 07-20-2013, 10:32 AM
  #2  
Flying Farmer
 
Ewfflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Turbo-props' and John Deere's
Posts: 3,160
Default

It would be part 135 all the way
Ewfflyer is offline  
Old 07-20-2013, 12:55 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Diesel450's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: CORP
Posts: 234
Default

Originally Posted by Ewfflyer
It would be part 135 all the way
It could only be part 91 if you are hauling your own (or the companies) materials. If its for hire its 135. There are operators using 310's, 402's for smaller freight. We've carried one 12x8x8 box in a lear before. And usually its just a few boxes that would fit in a 172, but its all about speed.
Diesel450 is offline  
Old 07-20-2013, 03:33 PM
  #4  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
MercuryBirdman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: Boeing E-6B Flight Test Flight Engineer
Posts: 44
Default

Originally Posted by Ewfflyer
It would be part 135 all the way
Thanks for the input. I'm guessing not much of a need for only light cargo in that case.
MercuryBirdman is offline  
Old 07-20-2013, 03:35 PM
  #5  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
MercuryBirdman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: Boeing E-6B Flight Test Flight Engineer
Posts: 44
Default

Originally Posted by Diesel450
It could only be part 91 if you are hauling your own (or the companies) materials. If its for hire its 135. There are operators using 310's, 402's for smaller freight. We've carried one 12x8x8 box in a lear before. And usually its just a few boxes that would fit in a 172, but its all about speed.
Thank you for the info. That helps my decision.
MercuryBirdman is offline  
Old 07-23-2013, 05:33 PM
  #6  
Flying Farmer
 
Ewfflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Turbo-props' and John Deere's
Posts: 3,160
Default

Originally Posted by Diesel450
It could only be part 91 if you are hauling your own (or the companies) materials. If its for hire its 135. There are operators using 310's, 402's for smaller freight. We've carried one 12x8x8 box in a lear before. And usually its just a few boxes that would fit in a 172, but its all about speed.
The OP was asking if there is a market for it, hence the assumption they are wanting to do it for hire.

I used to fly 135 in C310’s doing this exact thing, we'd haul everything from cancelled checks to airline parts/mechanics. Literally had a 5lb box of rubber grommets for Honda one time.

I would assume there is still demand for such flights, but starting a new 135 cert, getting the your name out there, are just a few of the many challenges
Ewfflyer is offline  
Old 07-25-2013, 07:47 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: Square root of the variance and average of the variation
Posts: 1,602
Default

Is that the true intent - to help pay for the cost of aircraft ownership? That was specified in the post. If so, profitability is not a concern. In that case, why not buy the twin and lease to an operation that already has a 135?
Std Deviation is offline  
Old 07-26-2013, 04:58 PM
  #8  
Flying Farmer
 
Ewfflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Turbo-props' and John Deere's
Posts: 3,160
Default

I think the saying goes....

"You know how to make a small fortune in aviation right?.......start with a large one"
Ewfflyer is offline  
Old 07-27-2013, 06:30 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Natca's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 579
Default

Originally Posted by MercuryBirdman
Does anyone know if there is a need or market to fly light cargo, like documents and other such light cargo? For example I remember hearing about pilots flying checks around. I know this doesn't need to be done anymore. I think, but just using that as an example. Also, what FAR would that fall under if there was such a market. Seems like it could be Part 91. Could it be profitable enough to pay for the cost of owning/operating a light ASEL plane like a Piper/Cessna? Anybody with knowledge or experience in this, please share.
Yes it is being done. It might work but your loads are going to be very miche and low margin. There are many operators flying a 310 ad e110 around that will low ball you are fly it faster. Most air cargo is time sesitive these days. If it is not central commuter or spmeone else is flying it.
Natca is offline  
Old 07-28-2013, 04:37 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 381
Default Well FDX gets $27,000,000,000.00 a year

Well FDX gets $27,000,000,000.00 a year from their express operation. (they need to spread their wealth around)

They are rated #5 top airline by revenue according to the latest AIRLINE BUSINESS magazine.

Of course they run a whole nationwide network would be hard to duplicate. The previous poster is correct that a niche market is needed.

FAX machines,PDF’s, email, cloud computing have eliminated much of the need to fly documents around. But small machine parts, a 1% golf clubs or pooch still has to go by air. Some architectural drawings are huge and need to be transported by air along with signed contracts. Another thing to look at is spanning a geographical boundary. So flying furniture generators, etc to an island 30 miles off the coast maybe a good niche.

If you use a single-engine aircraft for cargo you can go IFR and overwater. You cannot carry paxs for those stated conditions under Part 135.

Try going on FDX website and get some free quotes. You will see some pricing anomalies. It looks like packages going less than 250 miles are subsidizing the long-haul business. Ex. $80 to move 20 lbs 250 miles and $110 to move 2300 miles. I think if you stick to a 250 radius and have customers you can make money at $4 a lbs. If you have two airplanes they can meet halfway and you can serve a market 500 miles apart.

Perhaps you can start out as ad hoc and just charge by the flight hour. If you are running scheduled flight without enough customers you can burn through a lot cash in a month.
BizPilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Past V1
Major
10
01-04-2013 03:31 PM
FEtrip7
Cargo
38
02-16-2012 02:25 PM
Airsupport
Regional
84
02-06-2010 09:38 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices