Need High Alt. Indorsement for TBM700
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 115
But that doesn't mean you can just aimlessly give him instruction to build time. You could give him instruction to get fresh on instruments if he's willing to fly under the hood. You could also give him instruction to freshen up on the plane (if you had any experience in it). But not just to rack up time. I've tossed a resume before during an interview because a guy had given 500 hours of "dual given" to a friend of his in a C150. Ironically he had several hundred hours of "dual received" from the same friend. Coincidence? Me thinks not.
Instruction is supposed to be given for currency or towards a certificate or rating, not just to build time. I'm telling you as someone who interviews and hires pilots that it's not going to look good if it's obvious you're just giving dual to build time. If that's what you want to do, flight instruct.
#22
I know what I can do and can't do as far as logging time in the TBM, but does anyone have any ideas of how I should log my time spent in the TBM700? I have my CFI, but the owner of the TBM does not. I figure I could either act as PIC (pretty much just work the auto pilot).
I'm actually old school like WP and AAA. As AAA says, what looks good now may cause problems later. I know FedEx says on their app NOT to count any 61.51 "Sole Manipulator" time as PIC.
#23
You're right! You will need a high altitude endorsement and high performance endorsement and complex endorsement and because it is turbine powered 5 hours in type.
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 115
Endorsements aren't needed to log PIC, just to act as PIC. He can give dual without any of them appropriate endorsements (screwy, huh) provided the pilot receiving dual is already rated and has said endorsements.
The five hours in type only applies to multi-engine aircraft.
Another thing I just thought of - a lot of insurance companies don't insure more complicated aircraft for dual training...so you should probably check into that before you even think about it.
#25
No, no, no, and no.
Endorsements aren't needed to log PIC, just to act as PIC. He can give dual without any of them appropriate endorsements (screwy, huh) provided the pilot receiving dual is already rated and has said endorsements.
The five hours in type only applies to multi-engine aircraft.
Another thing I just thought of - a lot of insurance companies don't insure more complicated aircraft for dual training...so you should probably check into that before you even think about it.
Endorsements aren't needed to log PIC, just to act as PIC. He can give dual without any of them appropriate endorsements (screwy, huh) provided the pilot receiving dual is already rated and has said endorsements.
The five hours in type only applies to multi-engine aircraft.
Another thing I just thought of - a lot of insurance companies don't insure more complicated aircraft for dual training...so you should probably check into that before you even think about it.
You bring up an excellent point about the insurance requirements!
Last edited by hypoxia; 03-21-2011 at 10:59 AM.
#26
patience
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,068
I have flown with the owner of the TBM700 a few times already, not logging any time. The owner has never flown professionally, just for business travel, and has been flying for years (mostly turbine singles). He has had a few crashes (not to degrade from his ability) myself, along with other pilots on our field, know he could use some instruction, but it would be hard for me to tell him (I don't think it would be right either).
Being self insured, the owner of the TBM does not do recurrent training to my understanding. He does not seem like the type that thinks spending the money for training is for him.
Would providing free quality instruction, in return for me, logging quality time in a top notch airplane be a situation worth getting myself into as a low time pilot?
I'm also throwing the idea out there of spending my own money to get training in the airplane down at simcom (seems to be around 6K). It would certainly take care of the high alt endorement problem, which is why I started this thread. Would this be a foolish or a good idea? I have another friend with a TBM that has a pilot, and if I obtained proper training he would be more than happy to hire me as a backup when his guy is unable to fly (sickness, prior engagements flying other planes, vacation, etc.) He currently allows me to sit right seet with his pilot when ever weight is not an issue. I also don't think even with simcom training that insurance would allow me to act as PIC until I have at least 1000 hours tt, not sure though? Maybe going to simcom when I get closer to 1000tt would be a better idea? Even better if I could get someone else to pay for it, I don't know if that is going to happen though
With the proper training from simcom, I would think logging dual given in a TBM with the other TBM driver would not look iffy, like it might in my current situation (500hrs tt.)
The advice already provided in this thread has been extremely helpful, coming from guys that have been around aviation for years, as a young low time pilot any ideas or suggestions are a HUGE help, thanks again guys.
Being self insured, the owner of the TBM does not do recurrent training to my understanding. He does not seem like the type that thinks spending the money for training is for him.
Would providing free quality instruction, in return for me, logging quality time in a top notch airplane be a situation worth getting myself into as a low time pilot?
I'm also throwing the idea out there of spending my own money to get training in the airplane down at simcom (seems to be around 6K). It would certainly take care of the high alt endorement problem, which is why I started this thread. Would this be a foolish or a good idea? I have another friend with a TBM that has a pilot, and if I obtained proper training he would be more than happy to hire me as a backup when his guy is unable to fly (sickness, prior engagements flying other planes, vacation, etc.) He currently allows me to sit right seet with his pilot when ever weight is not an issue. I also don't think even with simcom training that insurance would allow me to act as PIC until I have at least 1000 hours tt, not sure though? Maybe going to simcom when I get closer to 1000tt would be a better idea? Even better if I could get someone else to pay for it, I don't know if that is going to happen though
With the proper training from simcom, I would think logging dual given in a TBM with the other TBM driver would not look iffy, like it might in my current situation (500hrs tt.)
The advice already provided in this thread has been extremely helpful, coming from guys that have been around aviation for years, as a young low time pilot any ideas or suggestions are a HUGE help, thanks again guys.
#27
I noticed ALLATPS offers a high altitude/high performance training endorsement for $2995
ATP Flight School: Jet Transition
Perhaps there are places to do it cheaper? I know the FAA has the ground portion/altitude chamber for free. Airman Education Programs
Perhaps you could get a qualified CFI to observe you operate the pressurization system and accomplish an emergency descent in the TBM? Also, the FARS may still permit the training to be done in a "flight simulator representative of a pressurized aircraft."
#28
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: Property Manager
Posts: 69
Yes, because he is qualified to act as PIC. He obviously does.
But that doesn't mean you can just aimlessly give him instruction to build time. You could give him instruction to get fresh on instruments if he's willing to fly under the hood. You could also give him instruction to freshen up on the plane (if you had any experience in it). But not just to rack up time. I've tossed a resume before during an interview because a guy had given 500 hours of "dual given" to a friend of his in a C150. Ironically he had several hundred hours of "dual received" from the same friend. Coincidence? Me thinks not.
Instruction is supposed to be given for currency or towards a certificate or rating, not just to build time. I'm telling you as someone who interviews and hires pilots that it's not going to look good if it's obvious you're just giving dual to build time. If that's what you want to do, flight instruct.
But that doesn't mean you can just aimlessly give him instruction to build time. You could give him instruction to get fresh on instruments if he's willing to fly under the hood. You could also give him instruction to freshen up on the plane (if you had any experience in it). But not just to rack up time. I've tossed a resume before during an interview because a guy had given 500 hours of "dual given" to a friend of his in a C150. Ironically he had several hundred hours of "dual received" from the same friend. Coincidence? Me thinks not.
Instruction is supposed to be given for currency or towards a certificate or rating, not just to build time. I'm telling you as someone who interviews and hires pilots that it's not going to look good if it's obvious you're just giving dual to build time. If that's what you want to do, flight instruct.
Would you have thrown the resume away if the 500hrs of "dual given" in the C150 was logged as "safety pilot" instead?
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 115
67C, with the training from an appropriate training facility would be a different matter, especially if the guy needs some work as you say. Again, not just racking it up for total time but genuinely giving the guy instruction, which as you say would be difficult to tell him.
Still going to have insurance issues giving instruction in it but shouldn't be nearly as much of an issue with the appropriate training.
But...do you really wanna shell out multiple thousands of dollars for X amount of hours of single engine turbine?
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 276
He has had a few crashes (not to degrade from his ability) myself, along with other pilots on our field, know he could use some instruction, but it would be hard for me to tell him (I don't think it would be right either).
Being self insured, the owner of the TBM does not do recurrent training to my understanding. He does not seem like the type that thinks spending the money for training is for him.
Would providing free quality instruction, in return for me, logging quality time in a top notch airplane be a situation worth getting myself into as a low time pilot?
Being self insured, the owner of the TBM does not do recurrent training to my understanding. He does not seem like the type that thinks spending the money for training is for him.
Would providing free quality instruction, in return for me, logging quality time in a top notch airplane be a situation worth getting myself into as a low time pilot?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post