NMB finds CAPA/Management Election Interferen
#1
New Hire
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: C-402 Captain
Posts: 3
NMB finds CAPA/Management Election Interferen
June 10, 2009
Our Fellow Pilots,
The NMB today, in case number R-7201, found a "Prima facie case of election interference." Prima facie is a common law term which essentially means sufficient evidence to prove a proposition or fact, unless rebutted. This kind of action by the NMB is extremely rare, as the threshold to find a prima facie case is relatively high. The election was very close, and we believe CAPA and the company colluded, and otherwise interfered with the election. The NMB after reviewing preliminary evidence submitted by the IBT, CAPA, and the company, decided our allegations warrant further investigation.
Your Cape Air Teamsters Communication Committee wishes to thank all of you who came forward after the election. If you did not come forward before, but wish to now, there is still time to let your voice be heard as the Board conducts its investigation.
- CATCC
Our Fellow Pilots,
The NMB today, in case number R-7201, found a "Prima facie case of election interference." Prima facie is a common law term which essentially means sufficient evidence to prove a proposition or fact, unless rebutted. This kind of action by the NMB is extremely rare, as the threshold to find a prima facie case is relatively high. The election was very close, and we believe CAPA and the company colluded, and otherwise interfered with the election. The NMB after reviewing preliminary evidence submitted by the IBT, CAPA, and the company, decided our allegations warrant further investigation.
Your Cape Air Teamsters Communication Committee wishes to thank all of you who came forward after the election. If you did not come forward before, but wish to now, there is still time to let your voice be heard as the Board conducts its investigation.
- CATCC
#2
New Hire
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: C-402 Captain
Posts: 3
A Correction
Our Fellow Pilots,
Regarding our last e-mail, one of the IBT's staff attorneys wanted us to make a small correction.
As he puts it "...the NMB did not find interference, technically - they found enough evidence to commence an investigation."
Since we are not all lawyers here, we may not always understand some of the finer points of law, and can make layman's errors reading even the plain text of a memo, like where the Board investigator writes "I find that the IBT's allegations and supporting evidence present a 'prima facie' case of election interference." Fortunately the IBT has a wealth of experience and remarkable resources that they can devote to supporting our efforts.
We will strive to maintain accuracy in all our communications to you.
- CATCC
Regarding our last e-mail, one of the IBT's staff attorneys wanted us to make a small correction.
As he puts it "...the NMB did not find interference, technically - they found enough evidence to commence an investigation."
Since we are not all lawyers here, we may not always understand some of the finer points of law, and can make layman's errors reading even the plain text of a memo, like where the Board investigator writes "I find that the IBT's allegations and supporting evidence present a 'prima facie' case of election interference." Fortunately the IBT has a wealth of experience and remarkable resources that they can devote to supporting our efforts.
We will strive to maintain accuracy in all our communications to you.
- CATCC
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,369
good luck Cape Air guys!
#7
On Reserve
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 20
Discussing union matters among pilots is one thing, but using a forum like this as a venue for direct communication from union officials is another. Just the opinion of one Cape pilot...
#8
Line Holder
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 59
Just another Cape pilot who would prefer these notices remain within the company email.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Splanky
Atlas/Polar
4
10-30-2008 07:53 AM