JSX's demise? Today, from ALPA...
06-20-2024, 11:07 PM
#31
Disinterested Third Party
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,260
They're about to. If they stay in business.
Nobody here has claimed "superiority," until now. You're the only one to mention it.
It's not hing to do with "superiority." It's everything to do with the relevant regulations; the FAA is in the process of bringing operations like JSX into conformity with relevant regulatory oversight, to which they are not currently obligated. That will change.
If they stay in business.
It's not hing to do with "superiority." It's everything to do with the relevant regulations; the FAA is in the process of bringing operations like JSX into conformity with relevant regulatory oversight, to which they are not currently obligated. That will change.
If they stay in business.
Last edited by JohnBurke; 06-20-2024 at 11:17 PM.
06-21-2024, 12:57 PM
#32
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,588
06-21-2024, 02:31 PM
#33
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,283
Allowing JSX’s passengers and their baggage to bypass the screening regimen that all other scheduled commercial airline passengers and bags must go through is a significant risk that must be eliminated
06-21-2024, 03:17 PM
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2011
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 959
But that's just me.
06-21-2024, 05:28 PM
#35
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,588
ALPA must also demand all jet airline special charters meet the strict TSA guidelines for passenger and baggage screening, no more sports teams bussing up to the 757 on the FBO side. This is a glaring loophole in the nations security, (as evidenced by a recent video) what's the greater threat a 30 seat emb-145 to BFL or a loaded 757 gassed up for transcon?
06-22-2024, 07:44 AM
#36
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,781
06-22-2024, 11:20 AM
#37
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 4,024
For years, the FAA has been lambasted for not being proactive and waiting until blood is spilled to change regulations.
But all is not lost, these airlines (and any airline) could apply for exemptions for all the 121 rules that they think are too stringent that they can provide an equivalent level of safety for and that are in the public interest.
But all is not lost, these airlines (and any airline) could apply for exemptions for all the 121 rules that they think are too stringent that they can provide an equivalent level of safety for and that are in the public interest.
06-22-2024, 01:08 PM
#39
Line Holder
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 55
that you've never heard of it or haven't bothered to inform yourself doesn't mean it doesn't exist
06-22-2024, 01:12 PM
#40
Line Holder
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 55
not a loophole, just what FARs and DOT rules permit so if you don't like it, seek change in regs, but don't say they're not following rules o
part 380 - which is DECADES old - permits one company to buy flight from 135 operator, set schedule, sell tickets to public -
fine print on jsx website:
Flights are operated with E135 or E145 aircraft by Delux Public Charter, LLC (dba JSX Air or Taos Air), which holds an FAA Air Carrier Certificate (4DPA097O) and DOT commuter air carrier authorization. Flights are public charters sold by JetSuiteX, Inc. as the charter operator and Delux Public Charter, LLC as the direct air carrier, subject to DOT Public Charter Regulations at 14 C.F.R. Part 380. PC# 21-125 and PC# 22-
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
