Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Fractional > NetJets
NJA Phenom 300 Engine Failure @ SFO >

NJA Phenom 300 Engine Failure @ SFO

Search

Notices
NetJets Fractional Operator

NJA Phenom 300 Engine Failure @ SFO

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-05-2024, 06:11 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tm602's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Position: Just a pilot
Posts: 762
Default

Originally Posted by cactusmike
Thats an overweight landing. Landing over your max certified weight. It's a non event in every jet I have flown, although I do not have any time in a Phenom. I'm not faulting the crew, they did a great job in bringing it back on one engine, it's just that the thinking now with this scenario is to take the overweight landing and get it on the ground as soon as possible. Especially with a long, dry runway.

Max landing weight limits are for normal operations, not emergencies.
Boeing builds better than Embraer light jets. I have flown both and had an overweight landing the 737 due to a fuel problem and it was just a writeup, deferral of the associated componenets and fairly short inspection. RTS same day. That Phenom is different. I've about 1000 hrs in it and it didn't instill much confidence in me insofaras strength goes, although the gadgetry is decades better than the B17, er, 737.
tm602 is offline  
Old 09-06-2024, 05:15 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Window seat
Posts: 5,477
Default

Originally Posted by tm602
That Phenom is different.
You're not kidding. Ex-airline guys are amazed that the brakes were actually certified. The 'Phenom swerve' is a real thing on landing. Worse than the early 767-200's which were also a treat. Early 757's before the correcting the brake valve shuttling were interesting at slow speed/brake pressure....like stopping at the jet bridge. :-0

Avoiding the 'Phenom swerve' is a small step for mankind, but a giant step for the pilot landing.

It has a 3 G limitation. Airliners are 2.5 G's. Is the airframe actually stronger? IDK.
Sliceback is offline  
Old 09-06-2024, 08:59 AM
  #13  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2022
Posts: 54
Default

Originally Posted by tm602
Boeing builds better than Embraer light jets. I have flown both and had an overweight landing the 737 due to a fuel problem and it was just a writeup, deferral of the associated componenets and fairly short inspection. RTS same day. That Phenom is different. I've about 1000 hrs in it and it didn't instill much confidence in me insofaras strength goes, although the gadgetry is decades better than the B17, er, 737.
Never flew a Embraer jet but the main reason behind max landing weight is to increase the amount of landings between heavy checks. At least that’s what Boeing says
PointBreak is offline  
Old 09-06-2024, 09:58 AM
  #14  
Mmmm wine
 
MinRest's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2020
Position: The Jet
Posts: 1,068
Default

Originally Posted by PointBreak
Never flew a Embraer jet but the main reason behind max landing weight is to increase the amount of landings between heavy checks. At least that’s what Boeing says
Depends on the load at touchdown and the weight, but there are varying degrees of overweight landings and an overweight/hard landing, most times it’s a writeup and sign off after checking the touchdown G.
MinRest is offline  
Old 09-06-2024, 01:45 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Posts: 310
Default

Lose an engine and an overweight landing inspection is the least of your problems. I landed a GIV overweight in Vegas once. (I put too much gas on at SNA. Who knew they used RWY 08...EVER?) It was only a couple hundred pounds. Gulfstream downloaded the G loading and it was a non-event.

I'd land overweight in a Phenom without a second thought. We (Flex) can do single engine taxi but, I'd probably take the tow after clearing the runway. Just to be safe.
AA717driver is offline  
Old 09-13-2024, 06:14 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tm602's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Position: Just a pilot
Posts: 762
Default

Originally Posted by PointBreak
Never flew a Embraer jet but the main reason behind max landing weight is to increase the amount of landings between heavy checks. At least that’s what Boeing says
That's right, its about landing gear and airframe life, not damage.
tm602 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Skylane93S
Corporate
2
02-05-2016 09:36 AM
Flyboy8784
Part 135
26
03-25-2014 11:13 AM
thecfi32
Part 91 and Low Time
11
05-05-2012 10:56 AM
tralika
Flight Schools and Training
12
03-17-2010 10:42 AM
SPDBOILER
Fractional
2
03-12-2008 09:38 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices