Search

Notices
NetJets Fractional Operator

LAWSUIT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-09-2024, 11:55 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 270
Default

Originally Posted by MinRest
This is spot on.

NJASAP and the pilot group are the problem. Management will give just enough to pass a contract and nothing more, and that is true of all airline management as well. Where it really differs is the message of NJASAP and how it leverages its position against management. NJASAP spent lots of money to publicly tarnish the experience level of the pilot group. This lawsuit isn't really that crazy from management. NJASAP and the pilot group typically have little leverage and this round was no different. Imagine an airline union making billboards and taking out Wall Street Journal ads about how crappy, inexperienced, and poorly trained their pilots are. What is insanity at every other union shop seems to be par for the course for NJASAP.
So you are saying that if the majors reduced minimums and started hiring R-ATPs the unions wouldn’t say anything about it?
Deserthusker is offline  
Old 06-09-2024, 12:32 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Position: B777 CA
Posts: 753
Default

Originally Posted by Deserthusker
So you are saying that if the majors reduced minimums and started hiring R-ATPs the unions wouldn’t say anything about it?
Well at United ALPA did worse. Fully endorsed and used as a way to compete our last contract negotiations allowed for involuntarily assigning new hires to captain positions.

While not exactly the same as hiring at R-ATP’s. I view it as worse and would much rather hire at R-ATP mins if they were mentored for years in the right seat and couldn't upgrade for a minimum of five years on the line. instead we have a lot of involuntarily minimally, qualified (I’m being kind) 24-28 year old new hire CA’s

ALPO sold out on safety!
Boeing Aviator is offline  
Old 06-09-2024, 03:29 PM
  #13  
Mmmm wine
 
MinRest's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2020
Position: The Jet
Posts: 1,065
Default

Originally Posted by Deserthusker
So you are saying that if the majors reduced minimums and started hiring R-ATPs the unions wouldn’t say anything about it?
R-ATPs are the hiring minimums. What would the union have to say about it? We have hired several R-ATPs...

It is the current state of the industry. Reducing minimums to meet demand is what everyone is doing. Making billboards effectively accusing the pilot group of being poorly training and inexperienced is however completely unique to NJASAP lol.
MinRest is offline  
Old 06-09-2024, 04:34 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 1,050
Default

Originally Posted by MinRest
R-ATPs are the hiring minimums. What would the union have to say about it? We have hired several R-ATPs...

It is the current state of the industry. Reducing minimums to meet demand is what everyone is doing. Making billboards effectively accusing the pilot group of being poorly training and inexperienced is however completely unique to NJASAP lol.
The training is poorly done. It is actually getting worse. They are signing off new hires in the Phenom that have never done a passenger leg. They are not adding anything to the training program to help prepare low experienced pilots for this job. They are throwing them on the line captains that are now getting less and less experience themselves with quick upgrades. This isn't as bad at the airlines since you go to relatively few locations in comparison and since they barely have to deal with passengers and all the other duties that a pilot must do at NetJets. I was a brand new captain at the regional with 500 hour SICs and while it wasn't all peaches and cream, I was able to keep my eye on them for basically all of their duties and make sure things weren't going sideways without my having any that it was happening. That is impossible at NetJets so the training needs to get better, not worse. Also FSI has a harder and harder time hiring and keeping good instructors, not that they seemed to have many in the first place. This also leads to sub standard training.

While we didn't get the contract we wanted, we still secured 52% increases over 6 years. This isnt ideal, but it isn't all that bad at the top of the pay scales. It didn't help the bottom of the scales as much since it is an even percentage for PIC and SIC and 14 years of pay scale rising in an even line, not in big jumps the first few years like the SIC scales at the airlines. This didn't solve the company's problem for paying enough early in the career to capture enough pilots into staying more than a year or 2. It didn't improve working conditions to also keep them. There are still quite large losses every month and still some senior pilots leaving even with the raises. Morale sucks and won't be improving anytime soon. The reason to give us a new contract is to fix things, not let them fester or get worse. The company cheaped out and now they will pay for it one way or another, either by paying more later to fix things or by just running very inefficiency with an angry work force. Honestly, what other union got a big raise when a contract wasn't due? Lots of people like to slam the union for not doing better, but nobody can tell us how to do better. Also it is the unions fault that we get what we get. Not enough do what is needed to secure a better contract. It appears the shaming didn't work and caused a bit of a split, but leadership did at least try to correct that course. I don't know what would have worked to get enough people on board to be willing to work less and give the minimum in order to force better conditions and more money, so I'd love to hear some suggestions for those that like to throw rocks at the leadership. There wouldn't be even what we got without those ads that are damaging to the brand and I won't be surprised to see more to really force some better safety.
jtf560 is offline  
Old 06-09-2024, 05:13 PM
  #15  
***
 
Joined APC: Jan 2023
Posts: 18
Default

Originally Posted by jtf560
The training is poorly done. It is actually getting worse. They are signing off new hires in the Phenom that have never done a passenger leg. They are not adding anything to the training program to help prepare low experienced pilots for this job. They are throwing them on the line captains that are now getting less and less experience themselves with quick upgrades. This isn't as bad at the airlines since you go to relatively few locations in comparison and since they barely have to deal with passengers and all the other duties that a pilot must do at NetJets. I was a brand new captain at the regional with 500 hour SICs and while it wasn't all peaches and cream, I was able to keep my eye on them for basically all of their duties and make sure things weren't going sideways without my having any that it was happening. That is impossible at NetJets so the training needs to get better, not worse. Also FSI has a harder and harder time hiring and keeping good instructors, not that they seemed to have many in the first place. This also leads to sub standard training.

While we didn't get the contract we wanted, we still secured 52% increases over 6 years. This isnt ideal, but it isn't all that bad at the top of the pay scales. It didn't help the bottom of the scales as much since it is an even percentage for PIC and SIC and 14 years of pay scale rising in an even line, not in big jumps the first few years like the SIC scales at the airlines. This didn't solve the company's problem for paying enough early in the career to capture enough pilots into staying more than a year or 2. It didn't improve working conditions to also keep them. There are still quite large losses every month and still some senior pilots leaving even with the raises. Morale sucks and won't be improving anytime soon. The reason to give us a new contract is to fix things, not let them fester or get worse. The company cheaped out and now they will pay for it one way or another, either by paying more later to fix things or by just running very inefficiency with an angry work force. Honestly, what other union got a big raise when a contract wasn't due? Lots of people like to slam the union for not doing better, but nobody can tell us how to do better. Also it is the unions fault that we get what we get. Not enough do what is needed to secure a better contract. It appears the shaming didn't work and caused a bit of a split, but leadership did at least try to correct that course. I don't know what would have worked to get enough people on board to be willing to work less and give the minimum in order to force better conditions and more money, so I'd love to hear some suggestions for those that like to throw rocks at the leadership. There wouldn't be even what we got without those ads that are damaging to the brand and I won't be surprised to see more to really force some better safety.

I bolded the most important part here. The pilot group is its own worst enemy. Not “the Union”. Until the pilot group is willing to do their job and not an iota more, we will never have the pay and QOL that is deserved.

From a management perspective, why pay more when the pilots are fixing the day to day problems. 80% of the pilots I fly with are constantly going above and beyond. Helping a management system that wants nothing to do with the pilot group. I am currently on tour with a high-up Union volunteer that is CONSTANTLY on the phone with Columbus fixing issues and pointing out problems. It makes me sick. Until this changes, until us pilots fly the airplane from point A to point B and nothing else, we won’t be paid for all the other things we do.
yankeepilot42 is offline  
Old 06-10-2024, 06:34 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2023
Posts: 293
Default

Originally Posted by yankeepilot42
I bolded the most important part here. The pilot group is its own worst enemy. Not “the Union”. Until the pilot group is willing to do their job and not an iota more, we will never have the pay and QOL that is deserved.

From a management perspective, why pay more when the pilots are fixing the day to day problems. 80% of the pilots I fly with are constantly going above and beyond. Helping a management system that wants nothing to do with the pilot group. I am currently on tour with a high-up Union volunteer that is CONSTANTLY on the phone with Columbus fixing issues and pointing out problems. It makes me sick. Until this changes, until us pilots fly the airplane from point A to point B and nothing else, we won’t be paid for all the other things we do.
Some of us take pride in the job we do and the product we provide.

We are in the service industry. Our job is to provide safe transport from point A to B AND an excellent service.

Part of that is putting out fires. It's a dynamic business and job. We aren't going to hubs and spokes.

Seems like the high up union volunteer understands that.
Swedepilut is offline  
Old 06-10-2024, 09:32 AM
  #17  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,992
Default

Originally Posted by AntiPeter
"The company cheaped out on the new contract..."

Name one airline that proposes an AIP where the company will pay more than they need to.

NetJets behaves no differently than the airlines. NJASAP and the NJA pilot group behave much differently, however.

Lanyards and provocative billboards pacify the pilot group (although perhaps at a high cost, considering current legal battles), but they didn't do much to increase leverage. Unpopular opinion, but the biggest enemy of NJA pilots are NJA pilots.
​​
Airlines have used similar tactics, personal experience, and some management teams absolutely hate it... you know you're onto something when they send the lanyard police out in force. I think it can help force things to a head, but would need to be carefully crafted, not just a shotgun approach. My shop stalled for years but came to the table pretty quickly after a few months of ads, pickets, and contract-themed uniform bling.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 06-10-2024, 09:47 AM
  #18  
Mmmm wine
 
MinRest's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2020
Position: The Jet
Posts: 1,065
Default

Originally Posted by Swedepilut
Some of us take pride in the job we do and the product we provide.

We are in the service industry. Our job is to provide safe transport from point A to B AND an excellent service.

Part of that is putting out fires. It's a dynamic business and job. We aren't going to hubs and spokes.

Seems like the high up union volunteer understands that.
I tend to agree. I am not somebody who can do the bare minimum or watch the operation burn down when I can step in and potentially stop or reduce a problem. I think that is our job as pilots. But the egregious extenders, flying broken airplanes, burying heads in the sand on what is really going on with the operation, never fatiguing, always saying yes, having no boundaries, is just as bad as those who write up paint scratches in BFE, are militant anti-company types.

Creating a false economy is bad on both sides of the coin. Management knows the pilot group will say yes, because they always do, and always will. To be respected as a pilot group, the pilot group has to earn it and honestly, NJASAP tarnishes it with their tactics.
MinRest is offline  
Old 06-10-2024, 10:04 AM
  #19  
Mmmm wine
 
MinRest's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2020
Position: The Jet
Posts: 1,065
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Airlines have used similar tactics, personal experience, and some management teams absolutely hate it... you know you're onto something when they send the lanyard police out in force. I think it can help force things to a head, but would need to be carefully crafted, not just a shotgun approach. My shop stalled for years but came to the table pretty quickly after a few months of ads, pickets, and contract-themed uniform bling.
That happens when the pilot group is unified and the union is calculated and smart about how they go through the negotiating process. Up until all that went down, management had the union and the pilot group wrapped around their fingers. It utterly shocked management when they saw the billboards and it absolutely put them on their butts when they saw the strike vote numbers.
MinRest is offline  
Old 06-10-2024, 11:12 AM
  #20  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2022
Posts: 45
Default

Originally Posted by yankeepilot42
I bolded the most important part here. The pilot group is its own worst enemy. Not “the Union”. Until the pilot group is willing to do their job and not an iota more, we will never have the pay and QOL that is deserved.

From a management perspective, why pay more when the pilots are fixing the day to day problems. 80% of the pilots I fly with are constantly going above and beyond. Helping a management system that wants nothing to do with the pilot group. I am currently on tour with a high-up Union volunteer that is CONSTANTLY on the phone with Columbus fixing issues and pointing out problems. It makes me sick. Until this changes, until us pilots fly the airplane from point A to point B and nothing else, we won’t be paid for all the other things we do.
Mmmk...
"it's not the union"
"it is the union"
obiden is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kronan
FedEx
8
09-18-2020 06:39 PM
Precontact
Cargo
0
06-19-2008 03:43 AM
Low & Slow
Major
1
11-09-2007 11:39 AM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
5
06-23-2007 06:45 AM
Gordon C
Major
5
03-22-2006 03:28 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices