Agreement In Principal
#71
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 1,053
If there was no leverage, there would be no AIP. There just wasn't enough leverage for anything better than the AIP we got. It does perhaps fix some of the crew food issues, but I do agree it solves almost nothing else. I can't imagine morale going up much and I certainly don't see attrition going down much. It seems to be a lose/ lose situation for everyone.
#72
CHILLAX
Joined APC: Dec 2023
Posts: 118
Please explain what leverage there is. Please avoid the " because my union speaks for me" bs rhetoric. Also, none of the "mom told me I was special and therefore there just is"
1. Did the leaving en mass occur (mass exodus) to the levels foretold by the union fortune tellers?
1. Did the leaving en mass occur (mass exodus) to the levels foretold by the union fortune tellers?
If I were NJ, I would dig my heels in and make the pilots pay for being so stupid as to sign an American Eagle like 16 year contract for peanuts.
#73
Line Holder
Joined APC: Nov 2023
Posts: 57
I was finally able to see the crew food "fix" and it is weak and won't fix the main issue of availability. It offers better food if in places that it is available, but it will probably save the company a bunch of money. Simply improving the meal deviation amount and availability would have been much better. The AIP solves basically nothing.
Option 2, which includes the increased $96 per diem and buy you own food is probably the new best offer, although the $130 per day receipts option sounds good for splurging.
#74
Line Holder
Joined APC: Nov 2023
Posts: 57
Please explain what leverage there is. Please avoid the " because my union speaks for me" bs rhetoric. Also, none of the "mom told me I was special and therefore there just is"
1. Did the leaving en mass occur (mass exodus) to the levels foretold by the union fortune tellers?
2. Did jets get parked? Other than PW engine issues?
3. Did or was the operation grind/ground to a hault?
4. Did empty new hire classes occur?
5. Did anything actually happen other than deploying section 6 tactics during an IBI?
6. Or the "Union says so"
But please carry on pushing the limited vocal majority talking points of the MB.
1. Did the leaving en mass occur (mass exodus) to the levels foretold by the union fortune tellers?
2. Did jets get parked? Other than PW engine issues?
3. Did or was the operation grind/ground to a hault?
4. Did empty new hire classes occur?
5. Did anything actually happen other than deploying section 6 tactics during an IBI?
6. Or the "Union says so"
But please carry on pushing the limited vocal majority talking points of the MB.
I keep hearing "if it's a resounding No, they will come back to us the next day and agree to our demands". Been hearing this for over a year. Weak. As much as there's disappointingly zero QOL in this deal I am voting Yes, because I can have a good control on my QOL, I can slow down if I need to slow down, I can call fatigue if I need to call fatigue, I can ask for a better hotel for rest and in most cases get it, when I need to. The Base Pay + FDP + 401K increase is too important in times like these, with the uncertainty 2024 is coming with, I would rather have an extra $55K per year (without counting FDP) when things go wrong then not have an extra $55K per year.
#75
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 1,053
what would have "increasing the meal deviation amount" change anything in "fixing the main issue of avaialability"? Even though I would have liked it.
Option 2, which includes the increased $96 per diem and buy you own food is probably the new best offer, although the $130 per day receipts option sounds good for splurging.
Option 2, which includes the increased $96 per diem and buy you own food is probably the new best offer, although the $130 per day receipts option sounds good for splurging.
#76
I didn't say more money for deviations would fix the availability problem, just that it would have been better. Option 2 is just 2 deviations over your regular per diem and this will likely be very poplular and save the conpany a lot of money. I'll probably experiment with option 2 and eat what I want without having to deal with the expense reports, but I am used to using my per diem anyway. I guess the next time we are in negotiations we will have to put negotiating capital into pumping this up since $23 deviations came nowhere close to keeping up with inflation. Maybe we will be able to improve it in another decade if we are lucky- I am not betting that the will of the group overall will be to continue the fight this time around or maybe ever again after these meager results.
Maybe 23 covers an appetizer and a drink at real restaurants.
#77
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 1,053
It is actually much worse than that- at least half the time you will have to get the food delivered to the fbo or hotel. The service charges for a meal can easily hit over $10. The current system meal deviations will have the company eat the "delivery fee" for you, but the other charges for a delivery are almost all way higher than the "delivery fee" that the company will absorb for a deviation. The new option will not get the delivery fee included. While I like more options, this is probably a better deal for the company- it saves them hassle and it will likely end up costing them less than if we didn't get the choices since it is extremely unlikely that the company pays less than $23 per crew food meal and we could always order up to 4, though almost nobody does more than 2. My guess is that they will also stop paying extra to almost all the hotels that offer breakfast in the rate for a slightly higher price.
#78
It is actually much worse than that- at least half the time you will have to get the food delivered to the fbo or hotel. The service charges for a meal can easily hit over $10. The current system meal deviations will have the company eat the "delivery fee" for you, but the other charges for a delivery are almost all way higher than the "delivery fee" that the company will absorb for a deviation. The new option will not get the delivery fee included. While I like more options, this is probably a better deal for the company- it saves them hassle and it will likely end up costing them less than if we didn't get the choices since it is extremely unlikely that the company pays less than $23 per crew food meal and we could always order up to 4, though almost nobody does more than 2. My guess is that they will also stop paying extra to almost all the hotels that offer breakfast in the rate for a slightly higher price.
#79
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 1,053
It is one of 3 options that you choose from before your tour and cannot change until the next work trip. We can opt to keep the original way which is broken and the reason we have more options now or we can go on receipts and get no per diem anymore for a 3rd option. Choices are nice, but the ones they give us all have short falls.
#80
Line Holder
Joined APC: Nov 2023
Posts: 57
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post