Search

Notices
NetJets Fractional Operator

Agreement In Principal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-13-2024, 03:57 PM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tm602's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Position: Just a pilot
Posts: 762
Default

Originally Posted by 60av8tor
Holy crap, my bad for using the word survive. Once again, I was merely surprised that someone said the MAJORITY of new hires he flew with "can't make it" (happy?) on NJ first year pay. That's it. That's all. No value judgement, not denigrating all the valorous, life-saving work we pilots do; none of that. Your identity as a pilot can remain in tact from my surprise that so many new-hires "can't make it financially". The question wasn't even for you as you didn't make the statement...

I do have a question for you though. Are you guys encouraged to call your shop Luv?🤢
No worries man. Its the internet and skim reading (I'm guilty of it) leaves things lost in what was meant.
I called it LUV because I am an extremely lazy typer....
tm602 is offline  
Old 02-13-2024, 09:24 PM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2023
Posts: 297
Default

Originally Posted by MinRest
This is great advice.

This AIP will probably pass, and the pilots are divided on it. If the union is unsure, then they have once again failed the pilot group. The fact that the pilot group is more upset at the divisiveness of the pilot group instead of being mad at the union for underdelivering, shows how nothing will never change. NJA will never be as good as the airlines. I really don't get how the pilot group isn't outraged at NJASAP for essentially folding after all this BS picketing and fluff they have been feeding the pilot group. The stuff about holding all the face cards has been an absolute lie.
A union member told me long ago. We picket to wear out the membership and make them think they have done all they could.

I always thought that was an interesting line.
Swedepilut is offline  
Old 02-14-2024, 03:28 AM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Position: Pilot
Posts: 531
Default

Originally Posted by Swedepilut
A union member told me long ago. We picket to wear out the membership and make them think they have done all they could.

I always thought that was an interesting line.
Probably the only truth to come out of NJASAP in the last 15 years.
AntiPeter is offline  
Old 02-14-2024, 07:01 AM
  #64  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2023
Posts: 57
Default

Originally Posted by Swedepilut
A union member told me long ago. We picket to wear out the membership and make them think they have done all they could.

I always thought that was an interesting line.
Makes so much sense. Intentionally or not, it is indeed what happens.
STzBack is offline  
Old 02-14-2024, 05:01 PM
  #65  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Posts: 1
Default

Before you tear into the union too much, be aware that the Union IS the pilot group. The leadership has to work with the amount of leverage the pilot group provides. In this case, we had a certain percent that sacrificed a lot and a certain percent that gave little to nothing. Unfortunately, we ended up getting back what the group as a whole put into it.
crgcar is offline  
Old 02-14-2024, 05:23 PM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2018
Posts: 226
Default

Originally Posted by Swedepilut
A union member told me long ago. We picket to wear out the membership and make them think they have done all they could.

I always thought that was an interesting line.
ar

This is 100% true! Picketing without a strike makes ZERO sense. They deal with "angry labor" everyday in their lives. They are not going to call NJ and say "Pay them more" because they know how much they are already sending to NJ and know that number will go up. You wont get any sympathy from them. If you want the clients to react, they need to be inconvenienced by not being able to get the flight they need and THAT is the point they will call NJ and say "Figure this out or I am taking my business elsewhere". Likewise, NJ has not reason to negotiate, they are happy to have 50+ families show up to picket because it means nothing. Overtime, the amout of people picketing will be less and less. They will wear you down. NJ will negotiate (and ONLY negotiate) when they cant effectively provide a service for their clients.
followingdreams is offline  
Old 02-15-2024, 12:18 PM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2021
Posts: 200
Default

Originally Posted by crgcar
Before you tear into the union too much, be aware that the Union IS the pilot group. The leadership has to work with the amount of leverage the pilot group provides. In this case, we had a certain percent that sacrificed a lot and a certain percent that gave little to nothing. Unfortunately, we ended up getting back what the group as a whole put into it.

There’s no leverage here. Not in a 10 year CBA duration.

That being said, the AIP fixes nothing and the continued erosion of NetJets (by its own merits) will continue.

How much market share will we need to give Flex before management comes back with enough to fix things?

My bet is a lot but… it’s not my company. I just work here.
ZebraSpots is offline  
Old 02-15-2024, 12:42 PM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 1,053
Default

Originally Posted by ZebraSpots
There’s no leverage here. Not in a 10 year CBA duration.

That being said, the AIP fixes nothing and the continued erosion of NetJets (by its own merits) will continue.

How much market share will we need to give Flex before management comes back with enough to fix things?

My bet is a lot but… it’s not my company. I just work here.
If there was no leverage, there would be no AIP. There just wasn't enough leverage for anything better than the AIP we got. It does perhaps fix some of the crew food issues, but I do agree it solves almost nothing else. I can't imagine morale going up much and I certainly don't see attrition going down much. It seems to be a lose/ lose situation for everyone.
jtf560 is offline  
Old 02-15-2024, 04:23 PM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 454
Default

Originally Posted by jtf560
If there was no leverage, there would be no AIP. There just wasn't enough leverage for anything better than the AIP we got. It does perhaps fix some of the crew food issues, but I do agree it solves almost nothing else. I can't imagine morale going up much and I certainly don't see attrition going down much. It seems to be a lose/ lose situation for everyone.

Please explain what leverage there is. Please avoid the " because my union speaks for me" bs rhetoric. Also, none of the "mom told me I was special and therefore there just is"

1. Did the leaving en mass occur (mass exodus) to the levels foretold by the union fortune tellers?
2. Did jets get parked? Other than PW engine issues?
3. Did or was the operation grind/ground to a hault?
​​4. Did empty new hire classes occur?
5. Did anything actually happen other than deploying section 6 tactics during an IBI?
6. Or the "Union says so"

But please carry on pushing the limited vocal majority talking points of the MB.
JMO127 is offline  
Old 02-15-2024, 06:52 PM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 1,053
Default

Originally Posted by JMO127
Please explain what leverage there is. Please avoid the " because my union speaks for me" bs rhetoric. Also, none of the "mom told me I was special and therefore there just is"

1. Did the leaving en mass occur (mass exodus) to the levels foretold by the union fortune tellers?
2. Did jets get parked? Other than PW engine issues?
3. Did or was the operation grind/ground to a hault?
​​4. Did empty new hire classes occur?
5. Did anything actually happen other than deploying section 6 tactics during an IBI?
6. Or the "Union says so"

But please carry on pushing the limited vocal majority talking points of the MB.
Why would the company give us another 200-300 million a year in salary and benefits when we still had almost 6 years left on the 2020 contract? This is a Bershire Hathaway company that is all about profit. This is sucking away quite a bit of profit for nothing if there is no leverage. Anyone who thinks Uncle Warren would allow this if there is no leverage is delusional.

As to what the leverage was, is was a combination of many of the above. The old death by 1000 cuts. There was no one thing that got this AIP.

1. The union leadership forecast increased attrition and was clear in repeatedly telling us that this would not be enough. This was a smaller part of the leverage. This AIP is unlikely to slow attrition much.
2. Mx availability, beyond the engine issues (that are almost completely solved now), has been trending down for many months. This is mostly the company making lots of poor choices and while the company wants to blame it on the union, it was unlikely that it was the pilots themselves doing the leverage building here. This is unlikely to change much whatever the outcome of the vote. I would only count this as the company perhaps believing it was leverage when in fact it wasn't.
3. Operations did not grind to a halt, but they certainly were getting worse and worse. Unhappy/ unmotivated pilots don't go above and beyond to make operations work smoothly. Likelihood to Recommend has been tanking and will likely continue to stay low or get worse regardless of the outcome of the vote since everyone is disappointed. I believe this is the biggest part of the leverage and this is what got us the 2018 contract without the union going out to force a new contract intentionally.
4. Newhire classes weren't empty, but they did have quite a few that were much smaller than planned. The pilot factories are pumping out pilots and this alone was never going to be a large percentage of the leverage. As other, better companies increased their recruitment of the experienced pilot pool, management was forced to reduce the mins more than once. They are still able to recruit, but not the pilots that they have always preferred. It remains to be seen if this will continue if the competition starts going after the same restricted ATPs in larger numbers since this contract is not particularly good for those at the bottom of the seniority list. The major airlines jump the payscales up very quickly and then the difference from one year to the next narrows after the scales are pretty close to the top. NetJets starts OK and then slowly moves up evenly over 14 years. This is going to be a problem for keeping pilots around. Just another thing the AIP doesn't fix for the company.
5. The union was able to annoy and embarrass management and Bershire Hathaway. The ads were getting worse and worse for the "brand" that management claims is all important. I firmly believe the ads destroying the brand were a real part of the leverage and much more so than any of the pickets, union bling, or the pilots not asking questions to management. The pickets, billboards, and advertisements will stop. The operations issues will probably remain with an unhappy pilot force. I'm sure some will be more motivated now, but paying me more while I'm still not happy isn't going to motivate me to go above and beyond and to work more days. This partway there AIP will likely buy slightly improved operations for a while, but without quality of life improvements that go beyond crew food and OT at 8pm on the last day, more and more pilots will burn out and ops will suffer.
6. Union leadership always said it wouldn't be any one thing that does it.
jtf560 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CafeConLeche
Mesa Airlines
163
09-15-2022 03:31 PM
Kayco
United
190
08-07-2022 12:19 PM
Cruise
Spirit
10507
12-01-2016 12:52 PM
bigtime209
PSA Airlines
194
09-30-2013 11:45 AM
Snarge
United
56
02-12-2013 06:33 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices