Search

Notices
NetJets Fractional Operator

Agreement In Principal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-12-2024, 11:45 AM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Position: Pilot
Posts: 531
Default

Why would the company want to terminate profit sharing? So they don't have to open the books and they can avoid transparency?
AntiPeter is offline  
Old 02-12-2024, 01:46 PM
  #52  
Mmmm wine
 
MinRest's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2020
Position: The Jet
Posts: 1,067
Default

Originally Posted by AntiPeter
Why would the company want to terminate profit sharing? So they don't have to open the books and they can avoid transparency?
Because it is a benefit that costs the company money. Literally, NJA might be the only major aviation company that doesn't offer profit sharing after this. Of course the company wants to eliminate profit sharing, but it is the union's job to say absolutely not and take a hard stand on it. They didn't...
MinRest is offline  
Old 02-12-2024, 06:38 PM
  #53  
Speed, Power, Accuracy
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: PIC
Posts: 1,723
Default

Originally Posted by STzBack
No sh!t the leadership is divived. Obviously. But it's more like "the majority of the leadership tends to suggest the YES vote, one guy is for war at all cost". Because all he wants is war and destruction, more than an actual deal".
Your camp has been telling us for 36 months that the company had no choice but to come to the table. You've been endorsing shaming pilots who extended, letting names be published on the MB, you cried for all TRs to resign, you've shamed those who took new TR jobs, you bashed new hires and the younger generation, you've told the world in ads that they were dangerous and lacked experienced, you then bashed the same training that you are a result of saying in public ads that it was dangerous, you used the attrition card before we had attrition, you rushed to the safety card in desperation, you post on the MB to brag when you AOG a plane on a daily basis because "I feel this isn't good, could maintenance have a look at it" and when you call fatigue every time your fart really stinks.you predicted an exodus never seen in history, you predicted a total collapse of the company durting the Holidays, etc, etc, etc. "

Where's the exodus? How's the hiring doing? Holiday season was pretty bad with all the "fatigue" and AOG everytime "I feel this isn't good, could maintenance have a look at it" calls. Result? No melt down as predicted. Depsite all the useful idiots on the MB being very aggressive towards the rest of the group, what happened? NJA had probably the busiest day of its history this weekend. And a succesful one at that. Because the majority of the group is doing the job we are paid for and were hired for. We all read the cba's before we signed, we knew what the pay was, especially those who came here in the past 3 years.

You keep selling job actions for a pipe dream, that incredible no condition deal that keeps on not showing up. Motivation/participation in union actions among the group is at it's lowest. There were no more than 40 people (including family members) who were going to show up at the Vegas SB picket.

As far as the EFPP as I have said many times before, whenever it is paid in 2025, it's peanuts money for 70% of the group. Surely not the hill I'll lose men for and definitely not worth sacrificing a 51% base pay increase for (not counting increase in FDP, 401K, last day OT, increase in compesation for check-airmen/training captains, etc).

So, vote No for nothing but endless war and arrive in 2029 looking back at the 6 years of potential money lost? No thanks, I would rather be comfortable when I arrive at the next fight.

I will wait for the details and the fine prints as soon as they release that to us and we will see.
Frankly my dear, I don't give a damn...

Part of me hopes this place burns to the ground. The way management is operating the joint, that outcome is more likely than kumbaya. Jusssss sayin...

And if people in YOUR camp had done a damn thing, we wouldn't be stuck with this POS.

Last edited by GeeWizDriver; 02-12-2024 at 06:52 PM.
GeeWizDriver is offline  
Old 02-13-2024, 12:12 AM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tm602's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Position: Just a pilot
Posts: 762
Default

Originally Posted by 60av8tor
Not sure what your pay scale is - the info on the NJ profile here is like code to me - but doesn't look like any FO base pay is much under 70k. You're saying the majority of guys you fly with can't survive on that?
The words came right out of your mouth.
tm602 is offline  
Old 02-13-2024, 01:41 AM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 594
Default

Originally Posted by yankeepilot42
It will pass. The majority of the Captains I fly with don’t want to lose out on the gains being offered in the near term. The majority of the new FOs I fly with can’t make it financially on the tours with no or low FDP pay so they will vote yes too.
Originally Posted by tm602
Forgive me for pooping in my $.02 when you didn't ask me, but things are mighty fine at Luv if you want to consider that in your escape plan.
Originally Posted by tm602
The words came right out of your mouth.
Holy crap, my bad for using the word survive. Once again, I was merely surprised that someone said the MAJORITY of new hires he flew with "can't make it" (happy?) on NJ first year pay. That's it. That's all. No value judgement, not denigrating all the valorous, life-saving work we pilots do; none of that. Your identity as a pilot can remain in tact from my surprise that so many new-hires "can't make it financially". The question wasn't even for you as you didn't make the statement...

I do have a question for you though. Are you guys encouraged to call your shop Luv?🤢
60av8tor is offline  
Old 02-13-2024, 08:39 AM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2023
Posts: 297
Default

Originally Posted by GeeWizDriver
Frankly my dear, I don't give a damn...

Part of me hopes this place burns to the ground. The way management is operating the joint, that outcome is more likely than kumbaya. Jusssss sayin...

And if people in YOUR camp had done a damn thing, we wouldn't be stuck with this POS.
Not with a roar but with a whimper,

The negotiating team isn't even in agreement. That should tell you tons. Negotiating team says one thing. Eboard says another. Sounds like the plan was flawed from the beginning. Maybe don't shoot your shot at first when we are in IBB not full blown negotiations.

A negotiating team member saying vote no either means there is divide or they are off to the airlines and could care less......

Kumbaya
Swedepilut is offline  
Old 02-13-2024, 09:17 AM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Position: Pilot
Posts: 531
Default

Originally Posted by Swedepilut
Not with a roar but with a whimper,

The negotiating team isn't even in agreement. That should tell you tons. Negotiating team says one thing. Eboard says another. Sounds like the plan was flawed from the beginning. Maybe don't shoot your shot at first when we are in IBB not full blown negotiations.

A negotiating team member saying vote no either means there is divide or they are off to the airlines and could care less......

Kumbaya
It's a huge positive the union is finally not in agreement, especially considering this AIP is likely inadequate and flawed.

Maybe perhaps it is the beginning of a new era where the union isn't negotiating away QOL and leverage? A lot of good came from the "FAB 5" 2004 failures, a regime change is long overdue.

Last edited by AntiPeter; 02-13-2024 at 09:34 AM.
AntiPeter is offline  
Old 02-13-2024, 11:01 AM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2023
Posts: 297
Default

Originally Posted by AntiPeter
It's a huge positive the union is finally not in agreement, especially considering this AIP is likely inadequate and flawed.

Maybe perhaps it is the beginning of a new era where the union isn't negotiating away QOL and leverage? A lot of good came from the "FAB 5" 2004 failures, a regime change is long overdue.
Maybe if those that are on the negotiation committee whom are saying no had any experince or tenure I'd be interested to see why.

Really all this person does is open up the union to negotiating in bad faith lawsuit if this fails.

Lack of experience is what it shows. Not even sure why they were in the room to begin with.
Swedepilut is offline  
Old 02-13-2024, 02:13 PM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Chris99's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: B717 CA
Posts: 447
Default

Anyone who is on the fence about whether or not to stay at NJs should be paying close attention to the responses in this thread and the poll that has been posted. WB is a genius at pitting senior pilots against junior pilots and getting his managers to negotiate long-term contracts that may or may not even keep pace with inflation. Just before the 2015 TA came out, I had a captain tell me he would vote "yes" on a TA whether or not it had ANY raises in it or not (he had child support and two mortgages to pay). Too many people have the "golden handcuffs" mindset to do anything but vote "yes" no matter how bad the TA is or what the union recommends. And the FDP program was pure genius to keep people flying no matter what. I wish you guys would get pay/retirement/QOL commensurate with the airlines for the amount of work you do, but it's just not going to happen. Ask on the MB whether the pay, benefits, and workload will ever match 121 and you will get an honest answer. Unless the type of flying, no commuting, and no health care premiums are too good to pass up for you, I would question how much you really want to work somewhere where your hard work isn't properly compensated--especially when the majors are hiring like gangbusters. The ONLY way your pay goes up significantly at NJs is if 121 pay increases and people start leaving NJs for 121--which is the only reason you even have this TA option right now. I enjoyed my time at NJs (10+ years, 5 of them furloughed), but the pay, retirement, and QOL I could get at a legacy airline forced me to quit and I haven't looked back since... Good luck and I wish you the best.
Chris99 is offline  
Old 02-13-2024, 03:14 PM
  #60  
Mmmm wine
 
MinRest's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2020
Position: The Jet
Posts: 1,067
Default

Originally Posted by Chris99
Anyone who is on the fence about whether or not to stay at NJs should be paying close attention to the responses in this thread and the poll that has been posted. WB is a genius at pitting senior pilots against junior pilots and getting his managers to negotiate long-term contracts that may or may not even keep pace with inflation. Just before the 2015 TA came out, I had a captain tell me he would vote "yes" on a TA whether or not it had ANY raises in it or not (he had child support and two mortgages to pay). Too many people have the "golden handcuffs" mindset to do anything but vote "yes" no matter how bad the TA is or what the union recommends. And the FDP program was pure genius to keep people flying no matter what. I wish you guys would get pay/retirement/QOL commensurate with the airlines for the amount of work you do, but it's just not going to happen. Ask on the MB whether the pay, benefits, and workload will ever match 121 and you will get an honest answer. Unless the type of flying, no commuting, and no health care premiums are too good to pass up for you, I would question how much you really want to work somewhere where your hard work isn't properly compensated--especially when the majors are hiring like gangbusters. The ONLY way your pay goes up significantly at NJs is if 121 pay increases and people start leaving NJs for 121--which is the only reason you even have this TA option right now. I enjoyed my time at NJs (10+ years, 5 of them furloughed), but the pay, retirement, and QOL I could get at a legacy airline forced me to quit and I haven't looked back since... Good luck and I wish you the best.
This is great advice.

This AIP will probably pass, and the pilots are divided on it. If the union is unsure, then they have once again failed the pilot group. The fact that the pilot group is more upset at the divisiveness of the pilot group instead of being mad at the union for underdelivering, shows how nothing will never change. NJA will never be as good as the airlines. I really don't get how the pilot group isn't outraged at NJASAP for essentially folding after all this BS picketing and fluff they have been feeding the pilot group. The stuff about holding all the face cards has been an absolute lie.
MinRest is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CafeConLeche
Mesa Airlines
163
09-15-2022 03:31 PM
Kayco
United
190
08-07-2022 12:19 PM
Cruise
Spirit
10507
12-01-2016 12:52 PM
bigtime209
PSA Airlines
194
09-30-2013 11:45 AM
Snarge
United
56
02-12-2013 06:33 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices