Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Fractional > NetJets
Last Last Best Final or Last Best Final Final >

Last Last Best Final or Last Best Final Final

Search

Notices
NetJets Fractional Operator

Last Last Best Final or Last Best Final Final

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-16-2023, 04:20 PM
  #171  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2023
Posts: 57
Default

Originally Posted by Pervis
Large cabin fleets don't do near as much OT as years past. I'm in one, and it doesn't matter if you're old or young. Again, no guarantees. Yea, one can pick up extended days, but I will not rely on that soft money for my budget. To do so is foolish at best. VAWDs can go away in a heart beat. OT is hit and miss. Even holiday pay can be elusive, depending on one's schedule. So no guarantees, no vote. The extras are icing on the cake if you so choose. Some of us prefer our families to working most of the month.

Oh, and company says they are postured to absorb downturns, unlike years past. Who absorbs the most loss if/when the economy tanks? With all the soft money, the pilots will be the largest single group to take the biggest hit when all that soft money dries up. Nice plan.
Who absorbed the loss at the airlines when the flying went away 2 years ago? did they get their min guarantee? Nope. Min Guarantee was gone, cut, pilots were forced to go on unpaid leave. Their real money was gone. You still had you base pay. What's happening to the A320 captains at B6 right now when the company is asking them to take LOA's for January? The soft money goes away for us, the real money goes away for them too when things go bad.

I understand your blind support for the union leadership, old methods worked back then and old style people still believe in old methods, still think in 2024 that all out wars to solve issues. I would not be surprised if the negotiating team never countered the last offer, never negotiated points, I wouldnt be surprised if ML did act as his typical self and would have walked out of the room, acting unhinged and unprofessional, along the lines of his insulting MB responses everytime someone asks a pertinent question. I wouldn't be surprised if with a counter offer and certain simple changes requests we would have not reached a better deal where we would have made an increase of about 28%-30% year over year and why not FDP at zero or at 5. Of course the company must have added stuff they knew they would have to let go with a counter offer. But The union lead negotiator has zero intention of negotiating, he wants to fight a war until his demands are met unconditionally, making sure some are not achievable.
He doesnt have many years left and will not suffer any consequences in 2029 if things go sour for us.

The union's leadership's job is to represent us, not to think for us, not make life choices for us, we are free, adults, we decide. The union's job is to negotiate for us, brings us a deal, we like it or not. we choose. If we don't like the deal, they do the job we pay a lot for, they go renegotiate. But, have you seen the salary paid to the union leadership? added to a CC76-CC72 base pay, pretty cosy to make a half mil' per year and not have to actually fly, I understand why certain people get all up in arms when talks of a recall are rempant.
What does ML have on PL and P? why have they not fired the failing negotiator they hired? They must know by now that he won't bring them a deal. Where's PL been? Why isn't he involved in the negotiating? It's his legacy as a union president that's at play.

Did you look at the growth at EJM in the past years? did you notice the percentage of EJM planes doing our "sell offs"? did you notice the alignement of uniforms? the redesign of interiors to look alike NJA planes? Do you know that people can actually buy into programs that actually give the company choices to put them on NJA tails or EJM tails depending on availability?
This group has it's limits, nobody is irreplacable, this company is replacable, BH can restart something whenever they're done with the disgruntle ones. As we have made it a personal affair, attacking individuals in their private lives, in their neighborhood and keep on insulting them publicly, do you really think that BH is going to play with a toxic group forever? Don't you think they have options and will have drastic options when needed, when this contract ends, to deal with the thorn that we could become? For sure I can be ramatizing, reading into something that maybe isn't there. But is it? Is a giant financial corporation like BH really going to get played by a small group of pilots making north of $200K/year? Do we really believe that? Are we so disconnected from reality that we actually believe that? Most of us have never had a real 8-5 job, 6 days per week, 4 weeks per months with 2 weeks vacations per year, we have no idea what real life is but we think we can demand anything. We want airlines compensations but we don't want to be sent home at 65.... We demand things and we have forgotten what negotiating means and that Santa doesn't exist and he won't bring us all and every toy we have asked for.

The sad thing is that none of the last 15 pilots I have talked to agree with what's happening and shared that the friends they talk have the same concerns and questions. It's starting to really feel like a hijack by a minority who has no intention to let this group decide for itself, and obviously no intention to counter-offer and negotiate. Pretty sad.
STzBack is offline  
Old 12-16-2023, 04:28 PM
  #172  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2023
Posts: 57
Default

Originally Posted by Sewertubeflyer
You do realize this cannot be put out to a vote currently right? Bullet points are not able to be voted on and that’s all they are right now. The company and union would need to get all the language into contract form and agree on it, then send it out which is impossible when they’re not talking.

As far as losing money, yeah we’re going to lose a little while we wait for a proper offer but even with what has been proposed, we’re under regional pay. I work far too hard to be paid less than the regionals.
This was a proper offer. It's not being renegotiated and not worked on to be put in the correct language to be brought to a vote because some people do not want us to vote. We are not "under regional pay" and believew me, you work much less than at the regional, stop being that delisuonal. stop acting like someone who cannot read the fine prints and knows life at the regionals in 2023. Why is PSA coming with a new magival money offer every 15 days? Because if they were making those 100s of thousands year 1 would they still be there? Why are FO refusing to upgrade to Captain at the regionals? Come on man, inform yourself.

Do you realize that when people have interested in negotiating, counter offer, make a deal, these bullet points can be made into language. Do you really believe that the company submitted a bullet point proposal as a "contract offer", come on, are you naive? this was an offer. We should have counter offered, drop some, modify some, don't you really think they have a bit more leeway as to how high they can go? The job of the negotiating commitee is to take these bullet points, send their adult response (instead of "no to everything" without counter points) and the language for a contract that we can vote on would take 48 hours to be written if needed.
STzBack is offline  
Old 12-16-2023, 05:28 PM
  #173  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2023
Posts: 57
Default

Originally Posted by Deserthusker
ok. One more time. What fleet are you on? Not a hard question.
Bro, irrelevant question and one that I will not answer anyway.
STzBack is offline  
Old 12-16-2023, 05:56 PM
  #174  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2019
Position: Phenom driver
Posts: 148
Default

I'm not great at reading interpreting all of the nuances of our contract, but it feels that our scope is pretty solid as far as using EJM or any other operator for sub-contracts, they are limited to 15% of our flying in times of growth. I can live with that.
Shenzi105 is offline  
Old 12-16-2023, 06:39 PM
  #175  
Mmmm wine
 
MinRest's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2020
Position: The Jet
Posts: 1,067
Default

Originally Posted by STzBack
Who absorbed the loss at the airlines when the flying went away 2 years ago? did they get their min guarantee? Nope. Min Guarantee was gone, cut, pilots were forced to go on unpaid leave. Their real money was gone. You still had you base pay. What's happening to the A320 captains at B6 right now when the company is asking them to take LOA's for January? The soft money goes away for us, the real money goes away for them too when things go bad.
You are conflating a lot of components here that is worth correcting. Those that went on reduced min guarantees did it VOLUNTARILY. Min guarantee was not gone, and cut, and pilots were not forced to go on unpaid leave. At least not at the majors. Base pay is min guarantee at the airlines. I can tell you that A320 CAs as B6 are doing just fine and will get min guarantee and more if there is flying for it. The LOAs are voluntary and it is pretty typical for the early months of the new year. AS is doing the same thing. They asked for it in JAN, you could take it if you wanted to. My line has 82 hours in it for Jan and I will get paid that or better. Honestly, your entire statement is basically incorrect.
MinRest is offline  
Old 12-16-2023, 06:49 PM
  #176  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Sep 2023
Posts: 3
Default

Originally Posted by STzBack
This was a proper offer. It's not being renegotiated and not worked on to be put in the correct language to be brought to a vote because some people do not want us to vote. We are not "under regional pay" and believew me, you work much less than at the regional, stop being that delisuonal. stop acting like someone who cannot read the fine prints and knows life at the regionals in 2023. Why is PSA coming with a new magival money offer every 15 days? Because if they were making those 100s of thousands year 1 would they still be there? Why are FO refusing to upgrade to Captain at the regionals? Come on man, inform yourself.

Do you realize that when people have interested in negotiating, counter offer, make a deal, these bullet points can be made into language. Do you really believe that the company submitted a bullet point proposal as a "contract offer", come on, are you naive? this was an offer. We should have counter offered, drop some, modify some, don't you really think they have a bit more leeway as to how high they can go? The job of the negotiating commitee is to take these bullet points, send their adult response (instead of "no to everything" without counter points) and the language for a contract that we can vote on would take 48 hours to be written if needed.
you are so uneducated and clearly don’t fly the line to realize how hard we work so you definitely are management scum.
Sewertubeflyer is offline  
Old 12-17-2023, 06:32 AM
  #177  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2020
Posts: 36
Default

Originally Posted by STzBack
You're reading the MB as if it is the opinion of the majority of the group. 90% of the group doesn't post on the MB. The only way to prove to you that enough of the membership are not of a mind like mine is to have a vote, but you're scared of it because you know very well that "we don't know what is good for us, and we don't know that we are brainwashed, used, etc, etc". Because we are all so naive in your mind that we cannot make decisions for ourselves and have opinions. Of course I can post on the mb, how can you be so primal that you see company men everywhere. I have said it before along with others on here and elsewhere, there is no conversation on the mb, it is not a place for opinion. as soon as you have different opinions like JL or AV or JD3 or even banned for life, you get insulted, personal attacks, dismissed. The old doberman guard is very active, seems to be living on it 24/7.
I’ve been with NetJets for about two years and don’t agree with anything you’ve said. The stats of the message board have been posted before. Maybe 90% don’t post but closer to %90 do read through It. Polls have been taken and no one wants that embarrassment of a potential offer. It looks like you came to this public forum to spread propaganda and the result is mostly you arguing with minrest and others that don’t even work here.
ProfessionalSN is offline  
Old 12-17-2023, 06:33 AM
  #178  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2021
Posts: 189
Default

Prof, it's called FUD.
Pervis is offline  
Old 12-17-2023, 09:32 AM
  #179  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2019
Position: Phenom driver
Posts: 148
Default

Originally Posted by ProfessionalSN
I’ve been with NetJets for about two years and don’t agree with anything you’ve said. The stats of the message board have been posted before. Maybe 90% don’t post but closer to %90 do read through It. Polls have been taken and no one wants that embarrassment of a potential offer. It looks like you came to this public forum to spread propaganda and the result is mostly you arguing with minrest and others that don’t even work here.
He's a bit all over the place and seem to like steering sh!!t but he does have some interesting points that more people share. Where's the embarrassement in having to reject a proposal through vote? It doesn't cost us anything to vote, it's a vote, yes or no. Some like you may think it's an embarrasing proposal, some like me could be 50/50 (I need a few things changed and I am pretty sure they can be changed) others will like it a lot. I am also starting to wonder why there's refusal to bring this last one (with a few negotiated changes) to a vote.

I have confidence our team is convinced we do have good negotiating credit left and will get a better deal before 2025. Because I hope we are not going to waste potential small improvement the way we've had them in IBI and get nothing until 2026. That would be a lot of money thrown away over the next 3 years.
Shenzi105 is offline  
Old 12-17-2023, 10:59 AM
  #180  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2022
Posts: 54
Default

Originally Posted by Shenzi105
He's a bit all over the place and seem to like steering sh!!t but he does have some interesting points that more people share. Where's the embarrassement in having to reject a proposal through vote? It doesn't cost us anything to vote, it's a vote, yes or no. Some like you may think it's an embarrasing proposal, some like me could be 50/50 (I need a few things changed and I am pretty sure they can be changed) others will like it a lot. I am also starting to wonder why there's refusal to bring this last one (with a few negotiated changes) to a vote.

I have confidence our team is convinced we do have good negotiating credit left and will get a better deal before 2025. Because I hope we are not going to waste potential small improvement the way we've had them in IBI and get nothing until 2026. That would be a lot of money thrown away over the next 3 years.
It’s pretty simple. Putting something to a vote ( even when the survey data says it will fail ) come with risks. If you need me to explain more than that PM me. But I think you get the idea.
PointBreak is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MysteriousMrX
Technical
31
07-13-2023 09:31 AM
docav8tor
Southwest
66
11-26-2020 02:24 PM
MIkeFavinger
Endeavor Air
7
02-10-2020 01:58 PM
Adlerdriver
FedEx
185
04-21-2019 08:05 AM
Ajax
Regional
140
12-03-2010 06:49 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices