Search

Notices
Money Talk Your hard-earned money

Liquidity Explained

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-29-2012, 06:57 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Fly Boy Knight's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: PT Inbound
Posts: 219
Default

Another shining example of how a business built on common sense managing practices can be utterly DESTROYED by one lapse in common sense. Helga was dumb for offering the "drink now, pay later" scheme and the bar patrons were dumb becoming indebted to Helga over a matter of beer.

I always find it interesting how our current economic environment is based upon the accumulation, management, and maintenance of debt. Everything anyone does anymore, is shrouded in debt. People finance homes, cars, educations, aviation training, everyday household items (via credit cards).... Heck, Sears company makes more money off of their credit lines than the actual sale of products (as of 2007). I find it interesting and quite scary at the same time. The people are in debt up to the behinds and invariably, so is their government. We have a financial system in this country that sincerely believes if we can just print more money (with no commodity backing behind it AT ALL).... things will be ok. Meanwhile, the dollar's value is plummeting (more money in circulation = each dollar in circulation loses value), our national debt keeps climbing, and things like "financial stability" and "liquidity" (or lack there of) are now once known nostalgic ideas.
Fly Boy Knight is offline  
Old 01-30-2012, 05:03 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 327
Default

Originally Posted by jungle
Liquidity refers to both the presence or absence of assets that can be converted to cash.

Could you please point out any previous post of this pub story by me or would you just admit it is you who are doing the ranting and seeking the attention?

Your move, put up or shut up.

You seem to be slightly confused sir.
I will put up. Its a good discussion. Economics has never been a strong point for me, but I am having trouble understanding how the "absense of assets that can be converted to cash" refers to liquidity.

Originally Posted by tomgoodman
There were "liquid" assets, but the pub's customers converted them to debt. The debts were bundled into securities and sold to unwary investors for cash. The securities were eventually used as toilet paper, flushed, and became liquid again.
They may have been liquid assests before all the patrons become unemployed alcoholics. But the responsiblity for creating the debt rests not with the customers, but with the bar owner... imo. Yes, the alchololics are responsbile too, of course. But come on, they're alcoholics. You're playing with fire. The alcoholics have nothing to lose. Quite the opposite.. drinks on the house!

Originally Posted by Fly Boy Knight
Helga was dumb for offering the "drink now, pay later" scheme
This is how I see it. What made her believe all the alcoholics would suddenly start drinking responsibly and getting jobs? She created a scheme to make it look like money was being made, sort of like Enron. An alcoholic will take what you give him. It doesn't relieve them of responsibility, but Helga and her partners should have known better.
AKASHA is offline  
Old 01-30-2012, 05:29 AM
  #13  
With The Resistance
Thread Starter
 
jungle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Posts: 6,191
Default

Sir, do you understand that this story is a metaphor?

I take it you cannot cite any previous posting of this story as you earlier asserted?

Liquidity is a measurement, much like hardness in steel. Steel may be more or less hard, assets may be more or less liquid-semantics can be boring.
jungle is offline  
Old 01-30-2012, 10:16 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 327
Default

Originally Posted by jungle
Sir, do you understand that this story is a metaphor?
No, I thought we were talking about your latest business venture. No Helda then, eh? Let's see then... is this a metaphor on the impact of the subprime mortgage crisis on the collapse of financial markets?

Originally Posted by jungle
I take it you cannot cite any previous posting of this story as you earlier asserted?
I didn't look.

Originally Posted by jungle
Liquidity is a measurement, much like hardness in steel. Steel may be more or less hard, assets may be more or less liquid-semantics can be boring.
True. And a measurement can also equal zero. And when an asset's value measures zero, it can longer be characterized as liquid.
AKASHA is offline  
Old 01-30-2012, 12:19 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tomgoodman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
Default

Originally Posted by AKASHA
And when an asset's value measures zero, it can longer be characterized as liquid.
An asset's value never goes to zero if the owner can find a "greater fool" who will buy it. Even the greater fool can profit if he knows that the asset, properly re-packaged, can be sold to a "super fool". It's only when the asset finally rests with the Ultimate Fool that it becomes illiquid. Ultimate Fools line up every November to hire their purchasing managers.
tomgoodman is offline  
Old 01-30-2012, 12:31 PM
  #16  
With The Resistance
Thread Starter
 
jungle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Posts: 6,191
Default

Originally Posted by tomgoodman
An asset's value never goes to zero if the owner can find a "greater fool" who will buy it. Even the greater fool can profit if he knows that the asset, properly re-packaged, can be sold to a "super fool". It's only when the asset finally rests with the Ultimate Fool that it becomes illiquid. Ultimate Fools line up every November to hire their purchasing managers.
There are a fair number of fools worth quite a bit less than zero too.


Perhaps next time we can talk about installing a printer in the basement to increase liquidity.

Or even better, one of my favorites: If debt doesn't matter, why should revenue be a concern?

Last edited by jungle; 01-30-2012 at 12:53 PM.
jungle is offline  
Old 01-31-2012, 05:12 AM
  #17  
Libertarian Resistance
 
Winged Wheeler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 757 FO
Posts: 1,057
Default More of the story

tell us what happens next:

bailouts for Helga and her suppliers. Angry cash-paying patrons resent bailouts and form the "beer party". Spoiled and envious non-producers want to "occupy Helga". A GSE is formed by an expansionist government: federal drinking and subsidies for drinkers (Freddie Suds).

WW
Winged Wheeler is offline  
Old 01-31-2012, 07:55 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Fly Boy Knight's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: PT Inbound
Posts: 219
Default

Originally Posted by Winged Wheeler
tell us what happens next:

bailouts for Helga and her suppliers. Angry cash-paying patrons resent bailouts and form the "beer party". Spoiled and envious non-producers want to "occupy Helga". A GSE is formed by an expansionist government: federal drinking and subsidies for drinkers (Freddie Suds).
HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! What an amazing, yet strangely familiar metaphor lol!
Fly Boy Knight is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FlyAstarJets
Cargo
13
06-26-2008 11:15 AM
FoxHunter
Hangar Talk
2
11-04-2007 01:38 PM
jungle
Hangar Talk
4
05-19-2007 05:20 AM
Sir James
Money Talk
2
09-30-2005 06:42 AM
RockBottom
Major
3
09-23-2005 02:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices