Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Money Talk
The Great Employer-Consumer Standoff >

The Great Employer-Consumer Standoff

Search

Notices
Money Talk Your hard-earned money

The Great Employer-Consumer Standoff

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-07-2010, 01:52 PM
  #1  
Administrator
Thread Starter
 
vagabond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: C-172
Posts: 8,024
Default The Great Employer-Consumer Standoff

I haven't thought through whether this applies to the airline industry, but it certainly is what's happening in my little coffee shop, and hundreds of other small businesses.

Employer-consumer standoff is key to economy - Stocks & economy- msnbc.com
vagabond is offline  
Old 03-07-2010, 03:30 PM
  #2  
With The Resistance
 
jungle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Posts: 6,191
Default

Irving Fisher was an odd but astute economist whose theories were mostly rejected in favor of Keynesian theories, but some of Fisher's ideas seem to be making a comeback. Among them was his theory of debt deflation outlined below, which seems to describe what you are seeing:

"Debt-Deflation"

"Following the stock market crash of 1929 and the ensuing Great Depression, Fisher developed a theory of economic crises called debt-deflation, which rejected general equilibrium theory and attributed crises to the bursting of a credit bubble.

According to the debt deflation theory, a sequence of effects of the debt bubble bursting occurs:

1.Debt liquidation and distress selling.
2.Contraction of the money supply as bank loans are paid off.
3.A fall in the level of asset prices.
4.A still greater fall in the net worth of businesses, precipitating bankruptcies.
5.A fall in profits.
6.A reduction in output, in trade and in employment.
7.Pessimism and loss of confidence.
8.Hoarding of money.
9.A fall in nominal interest rates and a rise in deflation adjusted interest rates.
This theory was ignored in favor of Keynesian economics, partly due to the damage to Fisher's reputation from his sanguine attitude prior to the crash, but has experienced a revival of mainstream interest since the 1980s, particularly since the Late-2000s recession, and is now a main theory with which he is popularly associated."
jungle is offline  
Old 03-08-2010, 10:48 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ryan1234's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: USAF
Posts: 1,398
Default

Fisher also opposed conventional income taxation and favored a tax on consumption to replace it. His position followed directly from his capital theory. When people save out of current income and then use the savings to invest in capital goods that yield income later, noted Fisher, they are being taxed on the income they used to buy the capital goods and then are being taxed later on the income the capital generates.

Last edited by ryan1234; 03-08-2010 at 11:00 PM.
ryan1234 is offline  
Old 03-13-2010, 04:44 PM
  #4  
Moderator
 
Cubdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: ATP, CFI etc.
Posts: 6,056
Default

Decades ago I took a bunch of economics and decided I like airplanes better. Found myself in grad-level electives with no idea what was going on. Seems like they said people will buy cigarettes and lattes until the bitter end in an economic downturn. So I don't think the problem with free spending at your coffee shop is due to the recession. Maybe it's the competition with 45 other coffee companies in Seattle, though I think the best cup of coffee I ever had was at an FBO at Tacoma Narrows. Try free first drink maybe, or a free first meal. Lure them over somehow.
Cubdriver is offline  
Old 03-17-2010, 09:32 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: PA-31/left, LJ31/right
Posts: 350
Default

Originally Posted by jungle
8.Hoarding of money.

This hoarding of money by the banks is not healthy for the economy. I was listening to KNX1070 yesterday on the way home from work, and according to a recent study thst they aired, banks lending practices are getting tighter and tighter. And all this after they have been bailed out by us (the tax payers). I understand that they don't want to lend to sub-par credit scores, but when it takes a credit score of 760 and above (according to KNX's independent data), for a bank to even begin to think about lending money, how will the economy start a recovery that is worth anything.
mshunter is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cruiseclimb
Major
1
11-04-2009 07:38 PM
mma35
Military
2
04-30-2009 02:11 PM
johnso29
Regional
35
04-22-2009 09:15 PM
FlyingPirate
Regional
74
01-15-2009 03:15 PM
Wasatch Phantom
Mergers and Acquisitions
9
01-09-2009 07:38 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices