Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
Restricted ATP for NFOs? >

Restricted ATP for NFOs?

Search

Notices
Military Military Aviation

Restricted ATP for NFOs?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-15-2019, 07:54 AM
  #121  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 12,241
Default

Originally Posted by navigatro
Navs are only good for three things:

designated driver

snacko

Star Trek trivia
According to several of my front seaters, "jettisonable ballast" also was a player.

And to all the guys I ever flew with, the Ejection selector was ALWAYS on aft initiate, no matter what you briefed. I never intended to eject from a flyable aircraft, or leave you alone in an unflyable one.
Excargodog is offline  
Old 01-15-2019, 10:03 AM
  #122  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,839
Default

Originally Posted by F4E Mx
When the USAF started flying the F-4 there was no requirement to even have a back-seater. We used to send out cross -country flights all the time with a single pilot. So, in ordinary bombing training on the range and ACM training over the Gulf of Mexico, if the back-seater (which were initially all rated USAF pilots) was not receiving instruction and not manipulating the controls (which he had in the back) he could not log any pilot time? Is that what some of you people are saying?
When I got a ride in a USMCR F-4S model - all I needed was the jet backseat survival qual and to be trained in a particular emergency where I would have to pull a specific CB located on the panel in the rear cockpit area.

As far as a second pilot qual'ed in the aircraft - when I rode backseat in 'B' or 'D' model Hornets with another instructor up front - I logged CP time.
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 01-15-2019, 11:25 AM
  #123  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 4,026
Default

§61.160 Aeronautical experience—airplane category restricted privileges.
(a) Except for a person who has been removed from flying status for lack of proficiency or because of a disciplinary action involving aircraft operations, a U.S. military pilot or former U.S. military pilot may apply for an airline transport pilot certificate with an airplane category multiengine class rating or an airline transport pilot certificate concurrently with an airplane type rating with a minimum of 750 hours of total time as a pilot if the pilot presents:

(1) An official Form DD-214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) indicating that the person was honorably discharged from the U.S. Armed Forces or an official U.S. Armed Forces record that shows the pilot is currently serving in the U.S. Armed Forces; and

(2) An official U.S. Armed Forces record that shows the person graduated from a U.S. Armed Forces undergraduate pilot training school and received a rating qualification as a military pilot.
Was referenced earlier, but here it is from the reg.
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Old 01-16-2019, 04:07 AM
  #124  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 281
Default

My question was that if a USAF F-4 pilot backseater flew on a mission and did not touch the controls but did his RIO bit and was not undergoing flight instruction of any sort some here say he could not log ANY pilot time as the F-4, at that time (early 70s), was often flown with only a pilot up front and the rear seat empty, i.e. no SIC was required so no SIC time could be logged. That would seem to indicate that an awful lot of F-4 backseaters who made it to the airlines shouldn't have been hired because most of their back-seat F-4 time shouldn't have been considered. I think the argument is bat**** but that is my understanding of some comments here.
F4E Mx is offline  
Old 01-16-2019, 04:25 AM
  #125  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,839
Default

Originally Posted by F4E Mx
My question was that if a USAF F-4 pilot backseater flew on a mission and did not touch the controls but did his RIO bit and was not undergoing flight instruction of any sort some here say he could not log ANY pilot time as the F-4, at that time (early 70s), was often flown with only a pilot up front and the rear seat empty, i.e. no SIC was required so no SIC time could be logged. That would seem to indicate that an awful lot of F-4 backseaters who made it to the airlines shouldn't have been hired because most of their back-seat F-4 time shouldn't have been considered. I think the argument is bat**** but that is my understanding of some comments here.
Understood.

That is why I mentioned that a backseater was required (so I was told) in the F-4S model at least due to the requirement for the particular emergency.

Then I gave an example of an IP (fully qualified pilot) riding in the backseat of a B/D Hornet (your same example) and how we DID log that time as co-pilot) by the 90s.

Peacock - Did those NFOs who were second pilots go through any commercial training (FSI, CAE, etc...) for the C-12 or was all training done inhouse?
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 01-16-2019, 02:32 PM
  #126  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2017
Posts: 659
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
Understood.

That is why I mentioned that a backseater was required (so I was told) in the F-4S model at least due to the requirement for the particular emergency.

Then I gave an example of an IP (fully qualified pilot) riding in the backseat of a B/D Hornet (your same example) and how we DID log that time as co-pilot) by the 90s.

Peacock - Did those NFOs who were second pilots go through any commercial training (FSI, CAE, etc...) for the C-12 or was all training done inhouse?
They went to FSI like the pilots did. I’m not sure if their syllabus was any different. They were restricted to the right seat only, couldn’t sign for the plane, and weren’t supposed to land. We had our guy land from time to time anyway, just not with passengers. I let flight surgeons land a few times too though.
Peacock is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DaCat1989
Hiring News
15
09-03-2014 11:09 PM
Bumper
Flight Schools and Training
7
01-21-2014 10:06 AM
Zona Pilot 1830
Aviation Law
3
12-17-2013 04:21 PM
Crazy Canuck
Career Questions
2
10-08-2013 03:13 AM
Planespotta
Flight Schools and Training
9
06-20-2007 08:19 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices