Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
Cessna builds a tactical jet >

Cessna builds a tactical jet

Search

Notices
Military Military Aviation

Cessna builds a tactical jet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-19-2010, 07:00 AM
  #1  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Cubdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: ATP, CFI etc.
Posts: 6,056
Default Light attack airplane proposal: Cessna 526

Nothing new here, just wanted to get this old beauty out and look her again. It was a great airplane that probably should have been secured as a JPATS trainer. In the end it lost out to a slightly cheaper airplane that had a single engine rather than two. But those who reviewed it at the time thought it the better airplane in the 1995 JPATS competition. Ironically, there is currently a push in Congress to acquire a number of LAAR (light attack and armed reconnaissance) airplanes, and the contract may very well go to a foreign supplier this time. I say, hang a GAU-14 Gatling gun in the nose, mount a few rockets on the wings, and make 750 of them.





Cubdriver is offline  
Old 02-19-2010, 08:22 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: Box Pusher
Posts: 151
Default

Originally Posted by Cubdriver
Ironically, there is currently a push in Congress to acquire a number of LAAR (light attack and reconnaissance) airplanes, and the contract may very well go to a foreign supplier this time. I say, hang a GAU-14 Gatling gun in the nose, mount a few rockets on the wings, and make 750 of them.
I don't know much about this plane, but would the F-20 do better in the LAAR role?
Kasserine06 is offline  
Old 02-19-2010, 08:33 AM
  #3  
Moderator
 
crewdawg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,896
Default

I say bring this bad johnny back.....this would suffice, and I would be first in line to fly it!

crewdawg is offline  
Old 02-19-2010, 08:52 AM
  #4  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Cubdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: ATP, CFI etc.
Posts: 6,056
Default

Originally Posted by Kasserine06
I don't know much about this plane, but would the F-20 do better in the LAAR role?

The Tigershark is too big, heavy, fast, and expensive for this role. The Texan, Cessna 526, and Tucano are much smaller, lighter, slower, and much cheaper aircraft. Think of a baby A-10 Warthog, that kind of thing. The T6-A was borne of the same competition as the Cessna, the 1995 JPATS competition. They are all very similar aircraft, except the 526 is slightly faster and more expensive than the other JPATS entries. With some updates it would be ideal in a LAARs role. Pilots used to love the Cessna A-37 DragonFly on which it is based.
Cubdriver is offline  
Old 02-19-2010, 08:59 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: retired
Posts: 992
Default

Originally Posted by crewdawg
I say bring this bad johnny back.....this would suffice, and I would be first in line to fly it!
The Spad or the Helldiver.......?
Dougdrvr is offline  
Old 02-19-2010, 12:04 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 867
Default

It reminded me of a redesigned Tweet.

Then I started thinking about the first American VLJ....Cessna 407. I don't think it ever flew because I think they just made a wooden mock-up.



Didn't somebody try to redesign the T-33 for JPATS with an engine config like the A-10?

Blackwater already has a Tucano, right?
deadstick35 is offline  
Old 02-19-2010, 01:07 PM
  #7  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Cubdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: ATP, CFI etc.
Posts: 6,056
Default

Nice link on the 407 here.

Don't know about the T-33 redo, but I read in AIAA a month or two ago that Blackwater has Super Tucanos on loan with the Air Force who likes them far too much. Tucanos may be groovy but Wichita needs more jobs and already has several low and slow attack airplanes ready to go. Incidentally, Blackwater calls themselves DKWSATI these days... don't know who shot all those Iraqis.
Cubdriver is offline  
Old 02-22-2010, 01:51 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FlyOrDie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB120 Left
Posts: 629
Default

Originally Posted by Cubdriver
The Tigershark is too big, heavy, fast, and expensive for this role. The Texan, Cessna 526, and Tucano are much smaller, lighter, slower, and much cheaper aircraft. Think of a baby A-10 Warthog, that kind of thing. The T6-A was borne of the same competition as the Cessna, the 1995 JPATS competition. They are all very similar aircraft, except the 526 is slightly faster and more expensive than the other JPATS entries. With some updates it would be ideal in a LAARs role. Pilots used to love the Cessna A-37 DragonFly on which it is based.

How about this...
Piper PA-48 Enforcer - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
FlyOrDie is offline  
Old 02-22-2010, 02:39 PM
  #9  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Cubdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: ATP, CFI etc.
Posts: 6,056
Default

None of the airplanes here will likely get it. The Mustang derivative does not have two seats, the Cessna can't handle dirt operations, the piston plane is a piston plane, and so on. The best airplane is probably the Hawker-Beechcraft Texan AT-6B, and I support that as well. I believe the actual request for proposal is not out yet however, which is why I wanted to put the Cessna 526 up and look at it. Who knows, they may be able to adapt the 526 to dirt strips, armor it up, hang some weapons and install the newer systems, and make it into a modern Dragonfly. I think it should be a fair competition, or better yet simply given to Hawker Beechcraft.

Wiki on LAAR
Cubdriver is offline  
Old 02-22-2010, 03:14 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,839
Default

You know what can already do most.....if not all of these requirements ?

The selected LAAR aircraft will have to meet several key requirements, including:

- Rough field operations. The RFI requires that the aircraft be capable of operating from semi-prepared runways such as grass or dirt surfaces.
- Defensive package. The aircraft will have to include several defensive measures, including a Missile Approach Warning System (MAWS), a Radar warning receiver (RWR), and chaff and flare dispensers.
- Armored cockpit and engine.
- Long loiter time. The aircraft must be able to fly 5 hour sorties (with 30 minute fuel reserves).
- Range. The aircraft must have a 900 nautical mile (1600 km) ferry range.
- Data link capability. The aircraft is required to have a line-of-sight data link (with beyond line-of-sight desired) capability of transmitting and receiving still and video images.
- Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities. The aircraft will have to laser track and designate targets, as well as track targets using electro-optical and infrared video/still images.
- Weaponry. The LAAR aircraft will need at least 4 weapons stores capable of carrying a variety of weapons, including 500 lb bombs, 2.75 inch rockets, rail-launched missiles, and illumination flares. The aircraft will also be capable of aerial gunnery, either with an integrated or pylon mounted gun.

Desired traits (but not requirements) include:
- Infrared signature suppression for the engine(s).
- 30,000 ft (9000 m) operational ceiling.
- 6,000 ft (1800 m) takeoff and landing distance.
- Aerobatic capabilities capable of maneuvers such as the Immelmann turn, Cuban eight, and Split S.
-------------------------

UAVs!
Just saying......

USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
turk
Flight Schools and Training
29
01-13-2012 06:58 AM
orvil
American
304
12-06-2011 11:32 AM
UCLAbruins
Fractional
10
03-09-2008 06:52 PM
vagabond
Pilot Health
1
03-05-2008 02:36 PM
Lennon
JetBlue
0
07-01-2005 08:27 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices