Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
Why are we doing this to ourselves ? >

Why are we doing this to ourselves ?

Search

Notices
Military Military Aviation

Why are we doing this to ourselves ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-26-2013, 06:17 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Petting Zoo
Posts: 2,090
Default

Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy

Do you think we need this big of military? Do you think we can train just as hard in the simulators and be just as effective?
Been working out well in the C17 world
Sputnik is offline  
Old 04-26-2013, 07:03 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
thrust's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,170
Default

Originally Posted by Sputnik
Been working out well in the C17 world
Do C-17 guys practice gear-down landings, thunderstorm avoidance, snowy/icy runway TOLD, and correct airport identification in the sim?
thrust is offline  
Old 04-26-2013, 07:12 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Petting Zoo
Posts: 2,090
Default

Sorry, was trying for sarcasm. Guess it wasn't clear.
Sputnik is offline  
Old 04-26-2013, 08:50 AM
  #24  
Moderator
 
crewdawg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,794
Default

Originally Posted by thrust
Do C-17 guys practice gear-down landings, thunderstorm avoidance, snowy/icy runway TOLD, and correct airport identification in the sim?
Well played!
crewdawg is offline  
Old 04-26-2013, 07:48 PM
  #25  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 12
Default

Originally Posted by thrust
Do C-17 guys practice gear-down landings, thunderstorm avoidance, snowy/icy runway TOLD, and correct airport identification in the sim?
What airframe do you fly? Any "pilot error" incidents lately?
DeltaPoBoy is offline  
Old 04-27-2013, 04:27 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
thrust's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,170
Default

Originally Posted by Sputnik
Sorry, was trying for sarcasm. Guess it wasn't clear.
Looks like we were on the same page....
thrust is offline  
Old 04-27-2013, 04:32 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
thrust's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,170
Default

Originally Posted by DeltaPoBoy
What airframe do you fly? Any "pilot error" incidents lately?
I can see how my avatar wouldn't give you any idea.
thrust is offline  
Old 04-27-2013, 12:06 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Fluglehrer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Position: Pipers & RV-12
Posts: 236
Default

Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy
This will not be a popular suggestion.

Do you think we need this big of military?
No, we don't need this big of a military. The very size of our military encourages use in matters not essential to the defense of the U.S. Constitution.
No more nation-building, especially in majority-Muslim nations. A decade of nation-building hasn't made much of a dent in the mindset of the people. It has made a dent in the U.S. pocketbook.
Fluglehrer is offline  
Old 04-27-2013, 04:33 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 291
Default

Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy
This will not be a popular suggestion.

Do you think we need this big of military? Do you think we can train just as hard in the simulators and be just as effective?

I know in the heavy world we could move most of the training into the simulators (if it hasn't been already) and remain safe and mission capable. We should not be burning 18,000 lbs and hour for a KC-10 to be conducting instrument approach training.

I know many people will disagree with me. But I think it could be done -- at least for the short term.
Yes, I do think that we need this big of a military. I am uncomfortable by how low it's been suggested that we draw down our forces. But I would also submit that we don't necessarily need this much capability in a standing, active duty force either.

As an example, I submit the UK. Their stated defense strategy for their interest in the Falklands is that Argentina is in no position to make a move. Thats it. Should Argentina secure outside sponsorship (as was a common occurrence during the cold war), the UK could do little more than smile and wave this time around.

I also agree with your suggestion that much of our readiness training could move to simulation based methods. That simulation based approach would have to be supplemented with more robust realistic evaluation methods, a-la Red Flag. A potential downside to this approach, if you and I are wrong in some of our assumptions, is the potential for increased mishap rates during the reduced in-flight training times and exercises.
BFMthisA10 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices