Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
AF announces RPA pilot training pipeline >

AF announces RPA pilot training pipeline

Search

Notices
Military Military Aviation

AF announces RPA pilot training pipeline

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-29-2010, 01:22 PM
  #61  
Line Holder
 
FightingFalconI's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Position: C-172, PA-34
Posts: 35
Default

Originally Posted by SkyHigh
I read someplace that UND is starting a remote pilot program. Does anyone know about this?

Skyhigh
they have graduated their first class.
FightingFalconI is offline  
Old 07-09-2010, 07:31 AM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MusDg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: B747 Driver
Posts: 198
Default

I didn't read through all the pages but this may blow some of your minds. I had a zero time stub come through Air Force IFS and blew me away. PA'ed through two blocks of instruction. I visited a UPT base last year and he finished first in class phase 2 and his IP said he would have soloed him in the pattern in the T38 after about 5 rides if the books allowed it. He finished first in phase 3 and was offered some impressive weapons systems. He requested with the flight and squadron commander to be an RPA guy. He wanted to be in the action and pulling triggers instead of flying high and TAAP. Which as of my last hearing from him is exactly what he is doing.
MusDg is offline  
Old 07-09-2010, 07:34 AM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MusDg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: B747 Driver
Posts: 198
Default

Also the Army is working on setting up the AH-64 and UH-60 to have a switch were they can be operated manually and remotely. The UAV is here and has been proven more effective both on cost and mission. We have been using them in the Army for decades. Use to hand launch small RC airplanes from the top of M1 tanks back in the day to get better VIS over ridgelines and corners before exposing the fleet.
MusDg is offline  
Old 07-09-2010, 04:29 PM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Deuce130's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 777 FO
Posts: 931
Default

Originally Posted by MusDg
I didn't read through all the pages but this may blow some of your minds. I had a zero time stub come through Air Force IFS and blew me away. PA'ed through two blocks of instruction. I visited a UPT base last year and he finished first in class phase 2 and his IP said he would have soloed him in the pattern in the T38 after about 5 rides if the books allowed it. He finished first in phase 3 and was offered some impressive weapons systems. He requested with the flight and squadron commander to be an RPA guy. He wanted to be in the action and pulling triggers instead of flying high and TAAP. Which as of my last hearing from him is exactly what he is doing.
Yes, this blows my mind. So much so that I doubt the story.
Deuce130 is offline  
Old 07-09-2010, 10:19 PM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,262
Default

Originally Posted by Deuce130
Yes, this blows my mind. So much so that I doubt the story.
+1 I'm not buying it.
Grumble is offline  
Old 07-10-2010, 02:29 AM
  #66  
China Visa Applicant
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Midfield downwind
Posts: 1,930
Default

To be fair, I've seen two students in the last year at Vance who have graduated in the top 1/2 of the T-38 class and put Preds very high on their dream sheet. They, too, just had a desire to be a trigger-puller and have direct impact on the war effort, and that was their rationale for putting RPAs that high.

The story seems strange (especially the 'I would have soloed him after the first 5 rides in the T-38' part -- you haven't even done a single no-flap pattern/landing after the first 5 rides, so there's no way a student COULD be sent solo even if he was Bob Hoover), but there might be a 10% truth root to it.
Hacker15e is offline  
Old 07-16-2010, 05:06 PM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MusDg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: B747 Driver
Posts: 198
Default

I hear three or four times per IFS class from pilot candidates wondering if they can still go RPA.

It was a general comment from his IP that he was getting excellents out the gate. Not that there was any way that he could have really soloed.

There are pilot selects out there who are more interested in making a daily effort with Preds than flying Vipers and Raptors. Not many but the number surprises me.

A classic example is me in wanting to make an effort. I could be back at AMR right now, or with Connie or North American. I choose to fly the mighty DA20 everyday because I feel I make a better contribution to aviation and country as an IFS IP than from using my skills to fly from point A to point B.

I love how no one seems to trust any one elses comments on here.
MusDg is offline  
Old 07-16-2010, 11:42 PM
  #68  
Expert Jumpseater
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: KC-135
Posts: 101
Default

Originally Posted by ryan1234
Has anyone actually met someone who got UAVs...er RPAs...out of UPT..and then got a fixed wing follow on assignment?
Nope. ACC/A3 (forgot his name) just did a road show to remind us that isn't happening anytime soon too...he also mentioned the TAMI 21 dudes are equally screwed. Your only way out is the 365 to MC-12s or "staff", whatever that is.
2xAGM114 is offline  
Old 07-19-2010, 01:36 PM
  #69  
Line Holder
 
FightingFalconI's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Position: C-172, PA-34
Posts: 35
Default

A SUPT grad in 10-11 at CAFB got a UAV SOCOM to Cannon and they told him that he could get in to Special Ops fixed wing later on. He was a non-volunteer from the T-38 track.
FightingFalconI is offline  
Old 07-19-2010, 02:20 PM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ryan1234's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: USAF
Posts: 1,398
Default

Originally Posted by Hacker15e
To be fair, I've seen two students in the last year at Vance who have graduated in the top 1/2 of the T-38 class and put Preds very high on their dream sheet. They, too, just had a desire to be a trigger-puller and have direct impact on the war effort, and that was their rationale for putting RPAs that high.

The story seems strange (especially the 'I would have soloed him after the first 5 rides in the T-38' part -- you haven't even done a single no-flap pattern/landing after the first 5 rides, so there's no way a student COULD be sent solo even if he was Bob Hoover), but there might be a 10% truth root to it.
If the 'desire to be a trigger puller' was the real, true motivation...why not put A-10, Strike Eagle, etc at the top of the list....or join the Army/Marines and fly the Apache/Cobra/Harrier?

Not saying it isn't...but from talking to a few guys that want to fly preds...it seems like they want to ride the wave of the future.
ryan1234 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Groundhog
Mesa Airlines
77
12-17-2009 07:01 AM
JeepDrowner
Regional
85
10-03-2009 05:18 AM
Longbow64
Part 135
117
07-23-2009 08:46 AM
JetBlast77
Regional
44
07-19-2009 01:19 PM
Viper25
Aviation Law
18
06-09-2009 11:38 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices