Search

Notices
Military Military Aviation

Army Fixed Wing Q

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-27-2011, 02:58 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: B737 FO
Posts: 138
Default

Originally Posted by Lasttoknow
A bit off the thread, but would the arng put a former usaf fixed wing pilot through initial rotor wing course or a rotor wing qual course. Also what would be the age cut off since I've been out of the usaf for 6 years and pushing 40? Thanks for your inputs.
No waiver required if your a rated aviator (any U.S. branch). You would be limited to the catagory your rated in unless you go to the RW course for rated aviators. The Army Reg 95-1 covers that question.
Scout is offline  
Old 02-19-2011, 01:27 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FlyArmy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 111
Default

OH-58Ds and their pilots get the most flight time of any airframe both deployed and in garrison for a few reasons: cheap to operate (only single engine aircraft in the Army which leads to much lower cost per flight hour (fuel/mx), and there are no flight simulators for the aircraft (except for the 2 new ones at Fort Rucker), so you need real flight hours to meet semiannual minimum flight hour requirements.

Budget cuts are here. Once the wars are over, flight time will be way harder to come by, especially for the maintenance hogs (AH-64Ds and CH-47s).

Fun mission too...
FlyArmy is offline  
Old 02-20-2011, 04:42 PM
  #33  
Line Holder
 
SunSherpa's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: Ex-C-141C Nav/Current C-23C Pilot
Posts: 26
Default

Originally Posted by schoolio
It's dead for now. Maybe when GEN Casey goes away there will be a chance for revival, but until then, it's gone.
Trying to mesh the typical Air National Guard Air Expeditionary Force 90-120 day C-27 rotations with the typical 1 year deployments that were the standard for C-23 deploying assets will not be an easy one. The Army fixed wing assets are used to being embedded for the long haul whereas the Air Guard have not had the same type of stomach for such long deployments. By the time a typical AEF rotation crew has figured out all the intricacies of operating within the AOR, it's time to pack up and head back to the US. There needs to be a certain level of continuity in these type of protracted military operations.
SunSherpa is offline  
Old 02-21-2011, 06:48 AM
  #34  
Line Holder
 
SunSherpa's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: Ex-C-141C Nav/Current C-23C Pilot
Posts: 26
Default

Originally Posted by Atlas Shrugged
The only thing more effed up than the C-27 FAC program is the USAF Tanker program.

Some Army Guard units are getting the C-27. Many, who need it most, are stuck with the C-23. We can thank the Active Army and USAF for screwing the Guard.
There's a current C-23 Sherpa divestiture plan being implemented by the National Guard Bureau that has all the C-23's in the ARNG retired by the first quarter of FY15 (i.e. by the end of 2014). The affected units are supposedly reverting from a fixed wing cargo mission to a fixed wing utility mission (whatever that means). So either those losing units are getting a C-12 as a replacement airframe or something else is coming down the pike in the future where the Army Guard might be reconsidered as a buy-in to the C-27 program.
SunSherpa is offline  
Old 02-24-2011, 05:41 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ChinookDriver47's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Left and Right of Whatever
Posts: 406
Default

Originally Posted by FlyArmy

Budget cuts are here. Once the wars are over, flight time will be way harder to come by, especially for the maintenance hogs (AH-64Ds and CH-47s)
Oh how true this is. I am already working on making an airframe jump. Interesting how the writing on the wall can be seen much more clear after you have been in a while and understand how "things" work.
ChinookDriver47 is offline  
Old 02-24-2011, 10:55 PM
  #36  
Stethoscope
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 308
Default

ChinookDriver47, which airframe are you looking at? Why?
cargo hopeful is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 09:05 AM
  #37  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 31
Default

Must second that one. Having been a -64D guy that just made the jump to fixed wing, I feel like I have made it to the promised land. Hopefully, this side of the fence will have some duration to it. Time will tell.
exnavy is offline  
Old 07-12-2012, 07:37 AM
  #38  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 9
Default Army FW

Hey all,

Been a while since I posted the FW ?'s on the board but here's my take on the whole rotor to FW transition. The C-12 army gig sounded nice initially with getting a flight safety king air type and multi time but got the run-around from multiple army FW units, my own included, that advertised "needing pilots" and so not fooled by that "carrot" that many friends have chased to no avail, decided to look into Air Guard. The grass is greener there for sure. There are opportunities to fly the coolest jets in the military, shorter deployments, military flight training universally accepted by all branches and of course, if you're an officer, you don't have to revert to WO1. Keeping or earning a hard earned commission is very rewarding in the Air Force aviation community. The AF is a PILOT oriented service and treats their aviators very well. Lots of perks that the Army would never allow; trips, budgets, equipment , allowances , quality of life etc... The downsides are that the Air Guard slots are very competitive to get, warrants will have to get a commission and recently because of some issues transitioning Army guys to AF flying, the AF fixed wing qual (gentleman's course) was cancelled so it's full up UPT if you're under 30. Also the Air Force is very regulation heavy. The AF version of 95-1 is several different pubs and a quite a long read. Oh but they let you wear flight suits Flying FW for any service would be great and if it's airlines you're after the multi turbine is all the same but for the big picture and quality of life I would highly recommend interested eligible RW guys to go blue. I'd start working at it before your 6 are up so you aren't close to an age limit. PM me if you got ?'s on it.

Later
sowchinook is offline  
Old 07-30-2012, 11:11 AM
  #39  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Posts: 1
Default

Originally Posted by sowchinook
Hey all,

Been a while since I posted the FW ?'s on the board but here's my take on the whole rotor to FW transition. The C-12 army gig sounded nice initially with getting a flight safety king air type and multi time but got the run-around from multiple army FW units, my own included, that advertised "needing pilots" and so not fooled by that "carrot" that many friends have chased to no avail, decided to look into Air Guard.

Later
What do you mean by carrot? Even though the units are hiring, are they not giving the fixed wing assignments to new recruits?

Thanks for any info.

PC
pcharron is offline  
Old 08-06-2012, 03:21 PM
  #40  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 9
Default

carrot=fixed wing slot. Usually a reward for putting in time as a RW guy. I have heard of a few people getting FW right out of IERW so it does happen, just wouldn't bank on it. Got some friends that were forced into FW slots that they did not want while others spend years trying to no avail. Timing is everything.
sowchinook is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Clue32
Military
0
10-28-2008 01:35 PM
Tinkerbell
Foreign
10
09-18-2008 09:39 PM
CaseyP
Military
13
08-10-2008 09:51 AM
TurboDog
Military
2
08-07-2008 11:00 PM
fiveninerzero
Military
1
08-01-2008 01:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices