Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
UPT to UAVs...what a deal! >

UPT to UAVs...what a deal!

Search

Notices
Military Military Aviation

UPT to UAVs...what a deal!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-16-2008, 05:19 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 667
Default

Originally Posted by LivingInMEM
Are you talking about the Army 3-ft wingspan line-of-sight remote control aircraft with a camera as opposed to the multi-million dollar USAF unmanned vehicles operating over-the-horizon at 300 knots with up to 5,000lbs of forward-firing ordnance in close proximity to manned aircraft and occasionally employing said ordnance in close proximity to friendly troops?

Why aren't you smarter on this?

"
the army actually has several types of uavs, one of which is strikingly similar to a predator.

MQ-1C Warrior - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
webecheck is offline  
Old 09-16-2008, 05:26 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,839
Default

Originally Posted by webecheck
the army actually has several types of uavs, one of which is strikingly similar to a predator.

MQ-1C Warrior - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
SWEET! Who is the Army is flying these?

USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 09-16-2008, 06:19 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 829
Default

Originally Posted by webecheck
the army actually has several types of uavs, one of which is strikingly similar to a predator.

MQ-1C Warrior - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I don't think so. From the site you referenced: "..The Army intends to procure 11 Warrior systems, each of these units has 12 UAVs and 5 ground control stations. With an expected total program cost of $1 billion, the aircraft is expected to become operational in 2009."

Given the cost of the program and the increased capabilities, any bets on whether the Army uses qualified rotary or fixed-wing pilots vs. regular ground troops?
LivingInMEM is offline  
Old 09-16-2008, 07:12 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GunnF16's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 129
Default

I'm with LivinInMem. Having flown combat missions in Iraq and Afganistan, the most difficult piece of the puzzle was ensuring you were putting ordinance on the right spot, especially w/ CAS which has been 99.9999% of the missions since the first few nights of OEF and OIF.

I think we all knew this day was coming when unmanned aircraft would start "fighting" in combat. The future really snuck up on us.
GunnF16 is offline  
Old 09-16-2008, 07:48 PM
  #15  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Posts: 16
Default

I think I remember the AF doing a test case where they used about 10 washouts from UPT and put them through UAV training. It was a failure. I don't think we should send guys right out of UPT to fly UAV's though. Either come up with another track that is designed for UAV's or let them get a tour under their belt.
Green Light is offline  
Old 09-17-2008, 01:42 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FlyFastLiveSlow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: On the Rock
Posts: 162
Default

It sounds to me like experienced fighter pilots have the right skill sets to tackle the UAV mission 100%. They'll get my vote any day.
FlyFastLiveSlow is offline  
Old 09-17-2008, 04:43 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 667
Default

Originally Posted by LivingInMEM
I don't think so. From the site you referenced: "..The Army intends to procure 11 Warrior systems, each of these units has 12 UAVs and 5 ground control stations. With an expected total program cost of $1 billion, the aircraft is expected to become operational in 2009."

Given the cost of the program and the increased capabilities, any bets on whether the Army uses qualified rotary or fixed-wing pilots vs. regular ground troops?

dude, that wiki data is old, but unclass proof of its existance. i have been to iraq as an alo on the ground. i know what the army has and their capes. if you believe that all the army has or all they use is a tiny backpack launced rc airplane, you are wrong!

in addition, i once listened to 2 pimple nosed 18 yr olds talk about their job flying uavs while waiting in the laundry line.
webecheck is offline  
Old 09-17-2008, 04:49 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 667
Default

Originally Posted by FlyFastLiveSlow
It sounds to me like experienced fighter pilots have the right skill sets to tackle the UAV mission 100%. They'll get my vote any day.
real funny man, i can appreciate the humor. you're probably right, but you wont find enough who wish to make it their permanent mws. the way i see it, since the upt commitment is 10yrs now, afpc should just send guys after their first tour b/c they cant 7 day opt it. for the leadership side, you'll get enough volunteers. and then theres the handful of guys who get medically dq'd or claim back/neck problems from pulling g's. send those guys, let them keep their flight pay. problem solved.
webecheck is offline  
Old 09-17-2008, 05:35 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: 757/767 FO
Posts: 847
Default

The only thing worse than putting up with a nav would be putting up with the intel weenie telling you where to go and how to get there.

Talk about Pilot Hell.
Spaceman Spliff is offline  
Old 09-17-2008, 09:48 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ugleeual's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 767/757 CA
Posts: 2,737
Cool

Originally Posted by webecheck
the army actually has several types of uavs, one of which is strikingly similar to a predator.

MQ-1C Warrior - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
True... but they are flown by Contractors... who are rated pilots.
ugleeual is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frisky Pilot
Regional
20
01-01-2022 05:02 PM
WhizWheel
Regional
6
09-07-2008 08:19 AM
birdstrike
Cargo
3
08-28-2008 04:43 AM
TipsyMcStagger
Cargo
56
08-13-2008 02:42 PM
FLY6584
Military
8
08-13-2008 11:59 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices