Search

Notices
Military Military Aviation

Osprey Time

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-16-2007, 07:25 PM
  #21  
Bored
 
Spongebob's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: Grumman Torture Device (weekends only)
Posts: 445
Default

Quick survey of my Harrier peeps says they just log it as FW time on the airline applications and nobody quibbled about it in an interview. 90% of the time they do low speed rolling takeoffs/landings, mainly due to some funky ground handling characteristics at higher speeds.

Now the V-22...not sure about that.

HTH
Spongebob
Spongebob is offline  
Old 10-17-2007, 01:17 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
atpcliff's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Capt
Posts: 3,215
Default

Hi!

The Osprey is a mil aircraft.

Bell/Agusta, who makes the Osprey, makes the Bell BA 609 tiltroter, which is a civilian tiltrotor. It is MUCH smaller than the Osprey, and much less complicated.

The BA609 Tiltrotor combines the speed, altitude, and comfort of a turboprop with the vertical takeoff and landing capabilities of a helicopter. Having cruising capabilities of 25,000 ft., this versatile aircraft will fly in icing conditions and extreme climates, from Arctic to desert. With seating up to nine passengers (the interior they show on the website has seating for 6 with a small galley, plus the two pilots) and at twice the speed of typical helicopters
...
From city center to city center, there's no quicker way to travel from one downtown area to another for distances between 50 and 500 miles
...
In March of 2003, Bell/Agusta made aviation history with the inaugural test flight of the world's first civilian tiltrotor at Bell's Flight Research Center in Arlington, Texas.

Designed from the outset for low life cycle maintenance and maximum operational flexibility, the civil tiltrotor will offer operators highly cost-effective, point-to-point transportation at cruise speeds up to 275 knots and at ranges up to 750 nautical miles,






http://www.bellagusta.com/air_ba_mainVid.cfm#video

cliff
ABQ
atpcliff is offline  
Old 10-17-2007, 07:05 AM
  #23  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,031
Default

I suspect that the 609 will be very successful...it has several significant safety advantages over the V-22...

No need for fast, tactical approach/LDG/departures. A slow approach almost elininates the vortex-ring state problem.

No incoming enemy fire, so the chance of total power loss is the same as any other twin-turbine aircraft...almost zero.

The transition from forward to rotor flight will be much slower than on the V-22, eliminating some technical risk and simplifying the aerodynamics of the transition.

No need for military payload vs. performance compromises...all aircraft designs are compromises, but civilian designs are biased more towards safety.
rickair7777 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jackal24
Regional
17
08-25-2007 08:59 AM
toeman9
Flight Schools and Training
7
08-21-2007 09:53 AM
sigtauenus
Military
23
07-25-2007 06:26 AM
Happy Camper
Major
6
02-14-2006 02:04 PM
Tech Maven
Hangar Talk
0
01-24-2006 06:48 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices