Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
So let me get this right… >

So let me get this right…

Search

Notices
Military Military Aviation

So let me get this right…

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-21-2021, 08:39 AM
  #31  
Perennial Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 12,096
Default

Originally Posted by METO Guido
Wouldn't taxi until cleared by escort.
So, shut down all four engines? Or wait until someone crawls into one looking for a hidden entryway to the cabin? And who is going to provide this escort? Excepting of course the other two thousand panicky people running to find some way - ANY WAY - to get on or in to your aircraft? And then what happens when the SIX HUNDRED AND FORTY PEOPLE you have back in the cargo bay all decide to come forward and give you THEIR OPINION (probably in Pashtun) about what THEY think you ought to done that? Or attempt to fly the bird themselves if you won’t? You gonna pull out the 9mm and start shooting? When there are 640 of them and you have four magazines max?

These things are SO EASY to decide after a couple days of sitting around the OSI conference room brainstorming possibilities and then doing a little googling and calling up the JAG to research similar events in the past. Not so much when the $hit storm is descending on you.
Excargodog is offline  
Old 08-21-2021, 09:14 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,819
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
So, shut down all four engines?
Possibly. 1st off, it's an important thread. Thanks for creating it. Similarities but this wasn't the Pueblo. They got VERY lucky. Let's see what develops. Let me ask you this, where's the best source to follow proceedings? Those with some focus on doctrine & evidence over editorial rewrites.
METO Guido is offline  
Old 08-21-2021, 02:32 PM
  #33  
Perennial Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 12,096
Default

Originally Posted by METO Guido
Let me ask you this, where's the best source to follow proceedings? Those with some focus on doctrine & evidence over editorial rewrites.
Very difficult to say. OSI investigations are hard to get at. Article 32 hearings even more so. Basically, the case needs to actually be approved for court martial before outsiders even know what is going on. At which time whatever general officer has approved it generally has their own credibility (and/or ego) on the line depending on the outcome.
Excargodog is offline  
Old 08-22-2021, 05:41 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,819
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
Very difficult to say. OSI investigations are hard to get at. Article 32 hearings even more so. Basically, the case needs to actually be approved for court martial before outsiders even know what is going on. At which time whatever general officer has approved it generally has their own credibility (and/or ego) on the line depending on the outcome.
Speaking of egos, Blinken appears this morning on Face the Nation. As staff director of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee he advocated Iraq's 2003 invasion and helped craft US policy for operations in Afghanistan/Pakistan 2009-2013. What a cluster to answer for now.
METO Guido is offline  
Old 08-22-2021, 05:57 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2018
Posts: 1,100
Default

Originally Posted by Drum
What would your actions have been if the AC on this C-17?

You talk big.

War is hell.

Move on.

NOTE TO THE CREW OF THIS PLANE (if you read these forums): DO NOT go into an interview with the OSI unless you have counsel. Not the ADC either, get someone good.
EDIT: never mind, that’s another one on the ignore list. The last thing I need to do is spend time on the nonsensical jabbering of a bat**** insane person.
jaxsurf is offline  
Old 08-22-2021, 05:59 AM
  #36  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,016
Default

Originally Posted by METO Guido
Possibly.
The tactical situation sure looked very grey to me. Whatever security existed had obviously already lost control so they were on their own.

A slow taxi appeared the best option to me... allow those who wanted to get out of the way the opportunity to do so. Not much you can do about people trying to ride on the outside, nor would they have any way of knowing that was happening.

They were cleared to takeoff and security units attempted to clear the refugees away from the aircraft.


Originally Posted by METO Guido
They got VERY lucky. Let's see what develops. Let me ask you this, where's the best source to follow proceedings? Those with some focus on doctrine & evidence over editorial rewrites.
Probably the reputable news media or FNC, this will be a high-interest story and if there's any hint of scapegoating the crew the word will get out. FNC will probably be all over that.

A good legal defense tactic in this case might be to leak the charge sheet (if any) and let public opinion and politics coerce the DoD into doing the right thing. An investigation must be done under the circumstances, but charges or discipline do not appear warranted unless there was some really egregious discussion on ATC or CVR tapes.

Both left and right seem to be sympathetic towards the aircrews doing evac ops...

https://www.cnn.com/videos/world/202...pt-sot-vpx.cnn
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 08-22-2021, 06:33 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,819
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
The tactical situation sure looked very grey to me. Whatever security existed had obviously already lost control so they were on their own.
No harm no foul v. desperate nomads flinging from the sky. Bubba said it clean, "Why did this have to happen Forrest?" Secure the field or close it. Time to go.
METO Guido is offline  
Old 08-22-2021, 06:47 AM
  #38  
Perennial Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 12,096
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777



A good legal defense tactic in this case might be to leak the charge sheet (if any) and let public opinion and politics coerce the DoD into doing the right thing.

https://www.cnn.com/videos/world/202...pt-sot-vpx.cnn
Gonna need to hire a civilian lawyer for that tactic, or else your area defense counsel will be giving you legal advice from an adjoining cell.
Excargodog is offline  
Old 08-22-2021, 07:31 AM
  #39  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,016
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
Gonna need to hire a civilian lawyer for that tactic, or else your area defense counsel will be giving you legal advice from an adjoining cell.
Indeed. Mixed civ/mil defense is probably ideal in a high-profile case.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 08-22-2021, 08:15 AM
  #40  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,016
Default

Originally Posted by METO Guido
Secure the field or close it. Time to go.
Maybe so, but that's not the crew's call. Their big-picture SA and tactical C2 comes from mil ATC, and the tower cleared them for T/O.
rickair7777 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices