Mesa 3.0
06-13-2017, 12:10 PM
#4272
Living the Dream
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,795
You don't think the court of pilot opinion matters when voting for a TA?
Best info I have says we took delivery of the first two at the end of May for entry into service at the end of summer, with the rest being delivered by the end of 2017.
Best info I have says we took delivery of the first two at the end of May for entry into service at the end of summer, with the rest being delivered by the end of 2017.
06-13-2017, 12:20 PM
#4273
On Reserve
Joined APC: Jun 2017
Posts: 18
So tell me, how would you have handled the bonuses?
06-13-2017, 12:37 PM
#4274
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2015
Position: Freight 75/76 FO
Posts: 140
https://flightaware.com/live/flight/N89349
https://flightaware.com/live/flight/N86350
06-13-2017, 12:39 PM
#4275
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Posts: 145
Do yourself a favor and stop spinning this to benefit your narrative. This new TA lags behind the other non-wholly owned carriers in pay. When you count in the other non-monetary benefits such as health insurance, training to different fleet types, etc. We are even FARTHER behind.
Obviously the percentage in growth in pay with this new contract amazes you... well not me.
06-13-2017, 12:48 PM
#4276
On Reserve
Joined APC: Jun 2017
Posts: 18
Maybe reading comprehension should be a concern of yours. I get the math, good job on that. The issue is that when you state the percentages, it doesn't show the big picture. SURE its a big jump "percentage" wise for Mesa, but even after that big jump, we still lag behind the remainder of the industry.
Do yourself a favor and stop spinning this to benefit your narrative. This new TA lags behind the other non-wholly owned carriers in pay. When you count in the other non-monetary benefits such as health insurance, training to different fleet types, etc. We are even FARTHER behind.
Obviously the percentage in growth in pay with this new contract amazes you... well not me.
Do yourself a favor and stop spinning this to benefit your narrative. This new TA lags behind the other non-wholly owned carriers in pay. When you count in the other non-monetary benefits such as health insurance, training to different fleet types, etc. We are even FARTHER behind.
Obviously the percentage in growth in pay with this new contract amazes you... well not me.
I am enrolled at community college for English 95. Someday I will speak English!
06-13-2017, 12:53 PM
#4278
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2015
Position: Freight 75/76 FO
Posts: 140
Maybe reading comprehension should be a concern of yours. I get the math, good job on that. The issue is that when you state the percentages, it doesn't show the big picture. SURE its a big jump "percentage" wise for Mesa, but even after that big jump, we still lag behind the remainder of the industry.
Do yourself a favor and stop spinning this to benefit your narrative. This new TA lags behind the other non-wholly owned carriers in pay. When you count in the other non-monetary benefits such as health insurance, training to different fleet types, etc. We are even FARTHER behind.
Obviously the percentage in growth in pay with this new contract amazes you... well not me.
Do yourself a favor and stop spinning this to benefit your narrative. This new TA lags behind the other non-wholly owned carriers in pay. When you count in the other non-monetary benefits such as health insurance, training to different fleet types, etc. We are even FARTHER behind.
Obviously the percentage in growth in pay with this new contract amazes you... well not me.
Did you really think J.O. was going to make a 180 degree change and put us ahead of SkyWest and Republic just like that? Did you not have enough evidence to infer that no matter what the company and the union did we were going to still be far behind the rest of the industry?
06-13-2017, 12:59 PM
#4279
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2015
Posts: 274
Maybe reading comprehension should be a concern of yours. I get the math, good job on that. The issue is that when you state the percentages, it doesn't show the big picture. SURE its a big jump "percentage" wise for Mesa, but even after that big jump, we still lag behind the remainder of the industry.
Do yourself a favor and stop spinning this to benefit your narrative. This new TA lags behind the other non-wholly owned carriers in pay. When you count in the other non-monetary benefits such as health insurance, training to different fleet types, etc. We are even FARTHER behind.
Obviously the percentage in growth in pay with this new contract amazes you... well not me.
Do yourself a favor and stop spinning this to benefit your narrative. This new TA lags behind the other non-wholly owned carriers in pay. When you count in the other non-monetary benefits such as health insurance, training to different fleet types, etc. We are even FARTHER behind.
Obviously the percentage in growth in pay with this new contract amazes you... well not me.
06-13-2017, 07:04 PM
#4280
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 90
No improvements to health insurance whatsoever, this desperately needed to change. From what I've seen and heard thus far I am not impressed.
I do have to wonder how we are getting a raise since we heard last time that Mesa has NO money and the last TA was the very best we could possibly get.
I do have to wonder how we are getting a raise since we heard last time that Mesa has NO money and the last TA was the very best we could possibly get.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
