Search

Notices
Mesa Airlines Regional Airline

New Mesa Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-16-2015, 02:12 PM
  #591  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Position: men without hats
Posts: 371
Default

I agree this TA has major shortcomings. But before I jump on the burn it down bandwagon I think there needs to be a sober discussion about where we go from here and what can realistically be obtained after another 2 or 3 years of negotiations. There are some good things like dropping reserve days and aggressive open time pick up for reserves. Do we want to throw it all out for several more years of status quo? -That is a rhetorical question, I'm not advocating one way or the other. Either way we have several more weeks until a vote. If you've already made up your mind that's great, but it doesn't mean the discussion is over. I admit I was pretty depressed when I saw this TA but maybe it's just because of the reality of our situation. Like someone else said we aren't Delta.
121again is offline  
Old 08-16-2015, 02:38 PM
  #592  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: CL-65 CA
Posts: 246
Default

Originally Posted by 121again
I agree this TA has major shortcomings. But before I jump on the burn it down bandwagon I think there needs to be a sober discussion about where we go from here and what can realistically be obtained after another 2 or 3 years of negotiations. There are some good things like dropping reserve days and aggressive open time pick up for reserves. Do we want to throw it all out for several more years of status quo? -That is a rhetorical question, I'm not advocating one way or the other. Either way we have several more weeks until a vote. If you've already made up your mind that's great, but it doesn't mean the discussion is over. I admit I was pretty depressed when I saw this TA but maybe it's just because of the reality of our situation. Like someone else said we aren't Delta.
This will be your contract for the next ten years. Just think about that.
logic1 is offline  
Old 08-16-2015, 02:48 PM
  #593  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,624
Default

Originally Posted by 121again
I agree this TA has major shortcomings. But before I jump on the burn it down bandwagon I think there needs to be a sober discussion about where we go from here and what can realistically be obtained after another 2 or 3 years of negotiations. There are some good things like dropping reserve days and aggressive open time pick up for reserves. Do we want to throw it all out for several more years of status quo? -That is a rhetorical question, I'm not advocating one way or the other. Either way we have several more weeks until a vote. If you've already made up your mind that's great, but it doesn't mean the discussion is over. I admit I was pretty depressed when I saw this TA but maybe it's just because of the reality of our situation. Like someone else said we aren't Delta.
This line of thinking is why we can't have nice things. I would vote this down just for the pure fact that it's a 5 year deal.
word302 is offline  
Old 08-16-2015, 03:08 PM
  #594  
Line Holder
 
Q400winner's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: E-175 Captain
Posts: 83
Default

Originally Posted by logic1
This will be your contract for the next ten years. Just think about that.
I work at Mesa. I worked at Republic also. I voted no on that contract and I'll vote no on this one. I will not be directly responsible for pilots having 2003 rates in 2019. These wages are a joke. I would rather see the airline go under then see guys stuck at 9 year FO pay making under 40k.. Yes there are lots of Captains that put in time. Well it's a two way street. Don't do the company any favors. The language in this TA is terrible also.
Q400winner is offline  
Old 08-16-2015, 03:15 PM
  #595  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Squawk87's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Position: PA34-200
Posts: 145
Default

Originally Posted by Q400winner
I work at Mesa. I worked at Republic also. I voted no on that contract and I'll vote no on this one. I will not be directly responsible for pilots having 2003 rates in 2019.
Couldn't figure out if you are serious or just a troll...
Squawk87 is offline  
Old 08-16-2015, 03:19 PM
  #596  
Line Holder
 
Q400winner's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: E-175 Captain
Posts: 83
Default

Originally Posted by Squawk87
Couldn't figure out if you are serious or just a troll...

Ehhhhhh?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Q400winner is offline  
Old 08-16-2015, 04:12 PM
  #597  
Living the Dream
 
deltajuliet's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,795
Default

Originally Posted by Q400winner
I work at Mesa. I worked at Republic also. I voted no on that contract and I'll vote no on this one. I will not be directly responsible for pilots having 2003 rates in 2019. These wages are a joke. I would rather see the airline go under then see guys stuck at 9 year FO pay making under 40k.. Yes there are lots of Captains that put in time. Well it's a two way street. Don't do the company any favors. The language in this TA is terrible also.
How long and how many contracts have we had these same payrates?
deltajuliet is offline  
Old 08-16-2015, 04:15 PM
  #598  
Line Holder
 
Q400winner's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: E-175 Captain
Posts: 83
Default

Well, last amended 2008. But the truth is, we aren't gaining much by passing it. The pilots in the future will hopefully have better leverage to get better rates than this. But these rates are worse than every regional in the industry. They are lower than republics expired contract rates. These are truths.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Q400winner is offline  
Old 08-16-2015, 04:16 PM
  #599  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,602
Default

Prior is right, there is no reason to even be talking about this anymore. Vote No
NovemberBravo is offline  
Old 08-16-2015, 05:03 PM
  #600  
Gets Weekends Off
 
iFlyRC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,198
Default

We need to start discussion how we are going to clean house of the MEC, removing everyone. No more 92 hour guarantees for them!
iFlyRC is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nwa757
Regional
31
07-31-2018 04:58 PM
winglet
Regional
45
12-18-2008 05:06 PM
Past V1
Regional
6
06-23-2008 08:40 AM
Squawk8800
Regional
5
04-08-2008 08:50 PM
calcapt
Regional
17
12-27-2006 06:34 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices