Search

Notices
Mesa Airlines Regional Airline

New Mesa Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-15-2015, 06:32 PM
  #571  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Posts: 71
Default

Originally Posted by milehighskyline
Gotcha. Dident understand the context their. Well even the most sr of pilots that I have flow with recently are saying he'll no. they ask 2 questions. 1. Is their a Pay increase? 2. Do we have better Insurance? you answer no and no. Their response is voting no. Their seems to be a big disconnect with the mec.
Dident? Really? Based on this and several of your other posts, please abstain from voting on the contract and the next presidential election.

#hillaryforprison2016

PS: If you are planning to vote "no" on the contract, then please vote.

I'm mostly joking. Sort of...

Make America great again. Vote no.
LTdan is offline  
Old 08-15-2015, 06:34 PM
  #572  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Posts: 667
Default

Originally Posted by RV5M
Well let's burn it down then. If our voting 'no' would actually cause a problem for Mesa, I'd be happy to lose my job over it. It'd be "fun", and great to rid the regional industry of it's lowest bottom feeder. I'm wondering, though, would voting it down actually be a win for management? Unfortunately, most pilots here have families to support, and the super-senior group would be hard pressed to start over.
People like you make me sick. Stand up for yourself, mesa takes this industry backwards all the time. This contract seems like a bully picking on nerds, the nerds will vote yes because of the tail between their legs.
Smutter is offline  
Old 08-15-2015, 06:56 PM
  #573  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Position: Yellow Bus
Posts: 355
Default

wow, that TA is really crappy. It's a shame that's what they think of you guys and that's all your worth. Not even 100% deadhead pay or 1.65 regional standard per diem....I'd vote "h.ell no!"

You are all just as qualified as any mainline pilot; demand more, fight for what you're worth.
dfwflyboy is offline  
Old 08-15-2015, 07:00 PM
  #574  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Position: Yellow Bus
Posts: 355
Default

Originally Posted by Smutter
People like you make me sick. Stand up for yourself, mesa takes this industry backwards all the time. This contract seems like a bully picking on nerds, the nerds will vote yes because of the tail between their legs.
Delta voted no on a 20% pay raise, they realized that the rest of contract was less than their worth. Sack up like they did.
dfwflyboy is offline  
Old 08-15-2015, 07:25 PM
  #575  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Position: men without hats
Posts: 371
Default

Originally Posted by wt932051
Rightfully under the current contact. If the new one is voted in, then they would be rightful to bid E-Jet and displace those Captains. Not picking on you, just saying, if it is in the contract, then it is fair. It was agreed upon. No different then the 2 yr captains vs 14 yr captains having the same seniority now. So your best bet is to not vote it in then if you don't like it. I like this clause of 1 percent, but still voting no because of how much of a mess the new TA would bring.
Fair enough. It's not even my biggest beef I'm a lot more unhappy about the time balancing for reserves. If I could take a red pen and cross out 3 or 4 paragraphs I might vote yes but as it stands the union guys are going to have to do one heck of a sales job if they want this to pass.
121again is offline  
Old 08-15-2015, 07:59 PM
  #576  
Covfefe
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,001
Default

Originally Posted by 121again
Fair enough. It's not even my biggest beef I'm a lot more unhappy about the time balancing for reserves. If I could take a red pen and cross out 3 or 4 paragraphs I might vote yes but as it stands the union guys are going to have to do one heck of a sales job if they want this to pass.
Are you saying you would re-vote in our current contract? That's all crossing out 3-4 paragraphs would effectively do. FO pay is less than a dollar raise. $0.29 raise for 2nd year FOs and I think $0.20 for 3rd year FOs. Captain pay isn't really increased either. Our basis for negotiation should be 700 pay at 700 rates and 175/900 pay at 79 seat pay effective now and increasing a decent amount for the next 5 years. Don't spend all that extra money in one place!

The only appreciable increase in pay comes from elimination of 50 seat base pay, which JO should be embarrassed about anyway for his redefining of the word stingy. Same with KCM. Those shouldn't even be points of negotiation or considered wins for the negotiating committee. Those are bare bones standard rewrites of definitions and closing of loopholes management has boned us with, not an increase in anything.

So where are we at? No realized gains (even some losses) in the reserve language, a lot of vagueness that the company will exploit, and no real pay raises.

Why am I going to vote this in again? How much more money will be in my pocket each year if we vote it in vs not? I'll tell you what, my principles and standing for who we are and what we are worth as professional aviators are worth far more than what that (small) number would be.
BeatNavy is offline  
Old 08-15-2015, 08:19 PM
  #577  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Position: men without hats
Posts: 371
Default

Originally Posted by BeatNavy
Are you saying you would re-vote in our current contract? That's all crossing out 3-4 paragraphs would effectively do. FO pay is less than a dollar raise. $0.29 raise for 2nd year FOs and I think $0.20 for 3rd year FOs. Captain pay isn't really increased either. Our basis for negotiation should be 700 pay at 700 rates and 175/900 pay at 79 seat pay effective now and increasing a decent amount for the next 5 years. Don't spend all that extra money in one place!

The only appreciable increase in pay comes from elimination of 50 seat base pay, which JO should be embarrassed about anyway for his redefining of the word stingy. Same with KCM. Those shouldn't even be points of negotiation or considered wins for the negotiating committee. Those are bare bones standard rewrites of definitions and closing of loopholes management has boned us with, not an increase in anything.

So where are we at? No realized gains (even some losses) in the reserve language, a lot of vagueness that the company will exploit, and no real pay raises.

Why am I going to vote this in again? How much more money will be in my pocket each year if we vote it in vs not? I'll tell you what, my principles and standing for who we are and what we are worth as professional aviators are worth far more than what that (small) number would be.
My hope was that we would all go up to the current CRJ900 pay scale immediately and get incremental raises after that. What we got is 4 years just to bring everyone up to the current 900 scale. That sucks but I would have at least entertained it in exchange for big QOL improvements. But I'm not seeing any improvements there are simply too many loopholes. If I could eliminate the loopholes and maybe add some stronger language we might have something to work with but that's purely hypothetical. Anyway the point is we have what we have and will have to vote up or down on the whole package the way it is currently written, not the way we wish it was written. -And yes the FO pay is crap.
121again is offline  
Old 08-15-2015, 09:51 PM
  #578  
Administrator
 
vagabond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: C-172
Posts: 8,024
Default

Mod Note:

Ok boys and girls. It's late over here in little old Seattle and I thought I would check on you before going for much needed beauty sleep. And what do I find? Profanity and the usual kindergarten my pee pee is bigger than yours, etc etc.

I'm on my worthless tablet so can only delete those posts I find objectionable. If any of them was yours and you'd like to repost, do so after cleaning it up. Tomorrow, however, I am back on the computer and won't be as forgiving.
vagabond is offline  
Old 08-15-2015, 10:07 PM
  #579  
Living the Dream
 
deltajuliet's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,795
Default

Originally Posted by milehighskyline
Comes down to this. If you have a job to do and can't do it well, don't take the job. If you can't negotiate a contract then you don't need to be a part of the mec. Harsh but that's life. If this airline can not fly trips and pay a slightly less than avrage wage they don't need to exist. When does this come out for a vote any way. Haven't seen any announcements yet.
Why do we have pilots negotiating, anyway? Surely with all our union dues we could afford a professional lawyer to do the negotiating?
deltajuliet is offline  
Old 08-15-2015, 11:38 PM
  #580  
Covfefe
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,001
Default

Originally Posted by vagabond
Mod Note:

Ok boys and girls. It's late over here in little old Seattle and I thought I would check on you before going for much needed beauty sleep. And what do I find? Profanity and the usual kindergarten my pee pee is bigger than yours, etc etc.

I'm on my worthless tablet so can only delete those posts I find objectionable. If any of them was yours and you'd like to repost, do so after cleaning it up. Tomorrow, however, I am back on the computer and won't be as forgiving.
Good evening your Honor welcome back to the party! Hope you and Mr Vagabond had an enjoyable Saturday night. Just an off-topic side question, how are we so lucky over here to get so much of your attention? I regularly visit other threads in the major and regional sections and see a lot worse un-moderated buffoonery than here (at least compared to this most recent thread). What gives with us Mesa folks? Don't get me wrong, I appreciate what you do and know what kind of drivel this thread would turn into without you all. Just curious about the disparity. #mesacommentsmatter!
BeatNavy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nwa757
Regional
31
07-31-2018 04:58 PM
winglet
Regional
45
12-18-2008 05:06 PM
Past V1
Regional
6
06-23-2008 08:40 AM
Squawk8800
Regional
5
04-08-2008 08:50 PM
calcapt
Regional
17
12-27-2006 06:34 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices