Search

Notices
Mesa Airlines Regional Airline

New Mesa Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-18-2016, 11:50 AM
  #5641  
Gets Weekends Off
 
VanDriver208's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: Full Nelson
Posts: 367
Default

Originally Posted by Is offline
I can't believe they still have jobs. After everything that happened with 3407 the media would have had a field day of something would have happened while one of them were PIC.
Hold on for a minute there....most of those involved weren't trying to cheat the system by upgrading without the required time. Many were prior 135 guys that came from a scheduled operation. They submitted their upgrade sheet and the company accepted that time as being applicable for upgrade based off the upgrade worksheet in use at that time. After the tail strike incident the FAA dug pretty deep into all recent upgrades, and upon review of the new rules per Part 117 they determined that those candidates did not meet the requirements. Is it embarrassing? Yes. Was it frustrating for those involved? Yes! But to insinuate that those guys should be fired for a paperwork error after successfully completing an 121 approved upgrade program is a bit of a stretch....don't you think? For the record....the guy who had the tail strike wasn't egregiously shy of the 1000 hours required. Like the others, he had submitted his upgrade worksheet and it was approved. After the incident the FAA examined his times and found him to be approximately 15 hours short due to ferry flights that had been conducted under Part 91. Thats essentially what started the domino effect. And don't forget, before people start the whole "1000 hours 121, not experienced enough to be a Captain" rant, prior to the 117 rules taking effect all you needed to be a Captain in a 121 operation was an ATP and a PIC type. So guys with 1501 hours were upgrading not all that long ago at various operators.
VanDriver208 is offline  
Old 04-18-2016, 11:57 AM
  #5642  
Gets Weekends Off
 
iFlyRC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,198
Default

Some airlines like the knee jerk reaction of destroying some ones career, at Mesa, you take responsibility for your mistakes or lack of judgement(reference the pilots using projected time instead of actual time on the upgrade), are sincere about it, blame no one else for it, and you'll probably still have a job at the end of the day. I know this must infuriate the flying nazi, elitist type A, superiority complexed, main line crj driving wholly owned pilots out there, but too bad!
iFlyRC is offline  
Old 04-18-2016, 02:54 PM
  #5643  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Posts: 145
Default

Originally Posted by VanDriver208
Hold on for a minute there....most of those involved weren't trying to cheat the system by upgrading without the required time. Many were prior 135 guys that came from a scheduled operation. They submitted their upgrade sheet and the company accepted that time as being applicable for upgrade based off the upgrade worksheet in use at that time. After the tail strike incident the FAA dug pretty deep into all recent upgrades, and upon review of the new rules per Part 117 they determined that those candidates did not meet the requirements. Is it embarrassing? Yes. Was it frustrating for those involved? Yes! But to insinuate that those guys should be fired for a paperwork error after successfully completing an 121 approved upgrade program is a bit of a stretch....don't you think? For the record....the guy who had the tail strike wasn't egregiously shy of the 1000 hours required. Like the others, he had submitted his upgrade worksheet and it was approved. After the incident the FAA examined his times and found him to be approximately 15 hours short due to ferry flights that had been conducted under Part 91. Thats essentially what started the domino effect. And don't forget, before people start the whole "1000 hours 121, not experienced enough to be a Captain" rant, prior to the 117 rules taking effect all you needed to be a Captain in a 121 operation was an ATP and a PIC type. So guys with 1501 hours were upgrading not all that long ago at various operators.
Well in all honesty, the information was available in the form of a letter of interpretation from the FAA that addressed counting 135 scheduled cargo ops. It was not allowed. Had these people done their research they would have found that out.

I'm not saying they should have been fired but we live and die by regs that we are expected to know and understand. 117 rules included.
Sumtinwong is offline  
Old 04-18-2016, 05:46 PM
  #5644  
Dumb Pilot
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Position: Broke
Posts: 784
Default

Originally Posted by VanDriver208
Hold on for a minute there....most of those involved weren't trying to cheat the system by upgrading without the required time. Many were prior 135 guys that came from a scheduled operation. They submitted their upgrade sheet and the company accepted that time as being applicable for upgrade based off the upgrade worksheet in use at that time. After the tail strike incident the FAA dug pretty deep into all recent upgrades, and upon review of the new rules per Part 117 they determined that those candidates did not meet the requirements. Is it embarrassing? Yes. Was it frustrating for those involved? Yes! But to insinuate that those guys should be fired for a paperwork error after successfully completing an 121 approved upgrade program is a bit of a stretch....don't you think? For the record....the guy who had the tail strike wasn't egregiously shy of the 1000 hours required. Like the others, he had submitted his upgrade worksheet and it was approved. After the incident the FAA examined his times and found him to be approximately 15 hours short due to ferry flights that had been conducted under Part 91. Thats essentially what started the domino effect. And don't forget, before people start the whole "1000 hours 121, not experienced enough to be a Captain" rant, prior to the 117 rules taking effect all you needed to be a Captain in a 121 operation was an ATP and a PIC type. So guys with 1501 hours were upgrading not all that long ago at various operators.
Not all of those guys were prior 135. There were a couple that had never worked anywhere but Mesa.
Is offline is offline  
Old 04-18-2016, 07:27 PM
  #5645  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Posts: 122
Default

Does anyone know how long upgrade for a new hire hired today would be? And is it based on growth or attrition, etc.?
GodIsGood is offline  
Old 04-18-2016, 08:34 PM
  #5646  
Chief Engineer
 
ScottyDo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Position: CRJ FO
Posts: 815
Default

Originally Posted by GodIsGood
Does anyone know how long upgrade for a new hire hired today would be? And is it based on growth or attrition, etc.?
Forever. Go somewhere else and make a decent wage.
ScottyDo is offline  
Old 04-18-2016, 08:41 PM
  #5647  
Covfefe
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,001
Default

Originally Posted by ScottyDo
Forever. Go somewhere else and make a decent wage.
ScottyDo is 0 for 770 so far in providing any relevant or useful info in any of his posts. Still waiting for him to go somewhere else and make a decent wage since he preaches it almost weekly.
BeatNavy is offline  
Old 04-18-2016, 09:10 PM
  #5648  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,602
Default

Originally Posted by GodIsGood
Does anyone know how long upgrade for a new hire hired today would be? And is it based on growth or attrition, etc.?
If you're new to 121 Im going to wild guess you'll upgrade in 3 years unless we get more airplanes. If you have 121 time you can probably upgrade on the CRJ pretty quickly, you'll just be permanent reserve.

For the record all the captains for quick upgrades are already on property, you're literally signing up to be a Mesa FO if you come here not a one year captain.
NovemberBravo is offline  
Old 04-18-2016, 09:18 PM
  #5649  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SMACFUM's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 516
Default

Originally Posted by BeatNavy
ScottyDo is 0 for 770 so far in providing any relevant or useful info in any of his posts. Still waiting for him to go somewhere else and make a decent wage since he preaches it almost weekly.
Pretty Ironic considering he was one of the largest Mesa cheerleaders on here back about a year ago
SMACFUM is offline  
Old 04-18-2016, 09:25 PM
  #5650  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,602
Default

Originally Posted by SMACFUM
Pretty Ironic considering he was one of the largest Mesa cheerleaders on here back about a year ago
Yeah but anyone that came a year ago is probably a month or 2 from upgrade. Just saying back then it was debatable wether or not you should come here.
NovemberBravo is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nwa757
Regional
31
07-31-2018 04:58 PM
winglet
Regional
45
12-18-2008 05:06 PM
Past V1
Regional
6
06-23-2008 08:40 AM
Squawk8800
Regional
5
04-08-2008 08:50 PM
calcapt
Regional
17
12-27-2006 06:34 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices