New Mesa Thread
#5224
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 977
I think you're a little confused. The article doesn't say anything about Mexico....only NEW Mexico. She was arrested in Texas so she has to be extradited to NEW Mexico (where supposedly the alleged crime took place) to face charges. Extradition is a legal process to transport you across jurisdictional borders to face charges where the crime was committed. I think you're thinking of deportation which is what happens if you are in the U.S. illegally. She is not being deported (pretty sure she's a U.S. Citizen), just extradited to New Mexico. Largely a formality between U.S. states, but necessary nonetheless.
So the article needs correction.
#5225
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 977
Really? They go through the same background check you do and quite frankly are MORE LIKELY to deal with the bad people then you are. One bad FA does not mean all FA's are bad. If that's the case, we can start digging up all the bad pilot stories (both at Mesa and other airlines) to make the point that all pilots are bad.
Shall we discuss how many pilots attempt to bring illegal things through KCM? Your overreaching on your high pedestal there and should look at your profession in the mirror before claiming your co-workers are evil incarnate.
Shall we discuss how many pilots attempt to bring illegal things through KCM? Your overreaching on your high pedestal there and should look at your profession in the mirror before claiming your co-workers are evil incarnate.
I simply pointed out the very logical argument that pilots--because of the nature of our jobs--should be allowed access to KCM, while FAs should not. I made no comment as to the morality or backgrounds of pilots vs. FAs, and no mention of "good vs. evil"...and I know it's the same background check, and I know there are unscrupulous pilots out there.
Yes--there are bad pilots. Yes--many FAs are great, educated, stable people who are competent and professional. But you won't change my mind that it is insane to give all FAs the capability to take down airliners by allowing them access to KCM lines. Before they were allowed to be a part of KCM, they had no more ability to bring weapons/explosives into an airport/onto an airplane than a regular passenger. With KCM, they have been accorded the same level of responsibility as pilots to not take down airplanes. I don't think that's smart at all.
Last edited by flapshalfspeed; 03-18-2016 at 09:05 PM.
#5226
I just don't want to lose my ability to take a bathroom break during flight. It was established that recently several FA arrests have been made at this airline for felonies. Additionally these arrests apparently took place while the person was on duty and in uniform. I guess now I'll have to alter my bathroom schedule and therefore affect my kidney/prostate lifespan? Either that or just search them in D.A.V.I.D for active warrants (LEO records program) before I open the flight deck door.
Last edited by Bumbaclot; 03-19-2016 at 04:58 AM.
#5227
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Position: Airbus FO
Posts: 279
I deal with this question a lot on the base visits and just with people I fly with. And every one of them, once I explain the process, understands a whole lot more that it's not some grand conspiracy.
First, remember that when this window was negotiated that we had somewhere close to a dozen bases and that everyone (including the planners) was brand new to the software. The window was set that long to deal with the scale of bases and the learning curve.
Nowadays the learning curve is mostly gone (more on that below) and we're down to 4 bases. This is why you generally get your stuff on the 21st.
It’s the back end that most people don't realize. There's more than just the pilot contract to deal with here. PBS closes on the 17th at noon. At that point a last update of data gets loaded and final roster checks are completed. When all that's said and done some initial runs are started. Run lengths vary from just a few minutes to a few hours based on pairing quality and base size.
Flight attendant bidding closes at 10a on the 18th. Being paper bids the results have to be posted later that day and every single FA needs to be manually integrated along with having their vacation and training put onto schedules with the resulting trips removed and dealt with. As a result there is basically 0 PBS work done by the company from the 18th-about mid day on the 19th.
Once Captain runs are done, those runs have to be sent over to the training department to have IOE pulled. We have to wait for that data to come back before FO runs can be started.
When all the runs are done the data has to be loaded into CrewTrac and Flica and error checked.
If one were to condense down ACTUAL work time the average time spend on a single seat (all bases) is about a day to a day and a half. But there's a lot of down time were we wait for various other events that result in calendar days being much longer.
Keep in mind for years Mesa has had 1 full time planner (and at some points 0 full time planners) to do this work. As a result priorities had to be assigned to items that were contractually due first (i.e. FA line awards and integration). As of last month the company has hired 2 additional planners bring the total up to 3. Long term this will help out greatly on all things that get handled by the planning department. However it's a steep learning curve on all the software.
I'm actually out in PHX right now working with the new planners on PBS. As far as number of runs, I would say I average about 6-8 runs per base/seat a month. Some more some less depending on how well it works.
TLDR: No it doesn't need until the 23rd. No it can't be done in 24 hours.
First, remember that when this window was negotiated that we had somewhere close to a dozen bases and that everyone (including the planners) was brand new to the software. The window was set that long to deal with the scale of bases and the learning curve.
Nowadays the learning curve is mostly gone (more on that below) and we're down to 4 bases. This is why you generally get your stuff on the 21st.
It’s the back end that most people don't realize. There's more than just the pilot contract to deal with here. PBS closes on the 17th at noon. At that point a last update of data gets loaded and final roster checks are completed. When all that's said and done some initial runs are started. Run lengths vary from just a few minutes to a few hours based on pairing quality and base size.
Flight attendant bidding closes at 10a on the 18th. Being paper bids the results have to be posted later that day and every single FA needs to be manually integrated along with having their vacation and training put onto schedules with the resulting trips removed and dealt with. As a result there is basically 0 PBS work done by the company from the 18th-about mid day on the 19th.
Once Captain runs are done, those runs have to be sent over to the training department to have IOE pulled. We have to wait for that data to come back before FO runs can be started.
When all the runs are done the data has to be loaded into CrewTrac and Flica and error checked.
If one were to condense down ACTUAL work time the average time spend on a single seat (all bases) is about a day to a day and a half. But there's a lot of down time were we wait for various other events that result in calendar days being much longer.
Keep in mind for years Mesa has had 1 full time planner (and at some points 0 full time planners) to do this work. As a result priorities had to be assigned to items that were contractually due first (i.e. FA line awards and integration). As of last month the company has hired 2 additional planners bring the total up to 3. Long term this will help out greatly on all things that get handled by the planning department. However it's a steep learning curve on all the software.
I'm actually out in PHX right now working with the new planners on PBS. As far as number of runs, I would say I average about 6-8 runs per base/seat a month. Some more some less depending on how well it works.
TLDR: No it doesn't need until the 23rd. No it can't be done in 24 hours.
P.S. I will also add that thanks to the PBS trainers telling everyone for years denial mode is bad, now you have an issue with the clear schedule and start next. Denial mode is a good thing. It means you put enough stuff in that you didn't want. Of course positive things are good too but I use denial mode and negative things almost exclusively and get what I want almost all the time, unless my seniority can't achieve it, hence denial mode kicks in. So stop saying denial mode is bad to everybody. Maybe you need to reevaluate how logic and computers work. Thanks to the PBS trainers saying this, they have created a mess with the else start next and clear schedule else start next commands. Those are bad if you don't know what you are doing. Good if you do. Denial mode and negative preferences are not because you can't screw it up and get reserve even if you have to many negatives. It will always build a line if there are 76 legal hours left to put together. So I blame this on the union for years of telling people not to go into denial mode and now are having issues with these other two commands that they were educating people on that is in my opinion more complicated to learn how to use correctly.
Last edited by wt932051; 03-19-2016 at 06:15 AM.
#5228
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Posts: 688
Don't forget rampers who don't go through any security and smuggle guns in and tsa agents who steal from passenger bags.
Nowhere in my post did I say that FAs are "evil incarnate." Nowhere.
I simply pointed out the very logical argument that pilots--because of the nature of our jobs--should be allowed access to KCM, while FAs should not. I made no comment as to the morality or backgrounds of pilots vs. FAs, and no mention of "good vs. evil"...and I know it's the same background check, and I know there are unscrupulous pilots out there.
Yes--there are bad pilots. Yes--many FAs are great, educated, stable people who are competent and professional. But you won't change my mind that it is insane to give all FAs the capability to take down airliners by allowing them access to KCM lines. Before they were allowed to be a part of KCM, they had no more ability to bring weapons/explosives into an airport/onto an airplane than a regular passenger. With KCM, they have been accorded the same level of responsibility as pilots to not take down airplanes. I don't think that's smart at all.
I simply pointed out the very logical argument that pilots--because of the nature of our jobs--should be allowed access to KCM, while FAs should not. I made no comment as to the morality or backgrounds of pilots vs. FAs, and no mention of "good vs. evil"...and I know it's the same background check, and I know there are unscrupulous pilots out there.
Yes--there are bad pilots. Yes--many FAs are great, educated, stable people who are competent and professional. But you won't change my mind that it is insane to give all FAs the capability to take down airliners by allowing them access to KCM lines. Before they were allowed to be a part of KCM, they had no more ability to bring weapons/explosives into an airport/onto an airplane than a regular passenger. With KCM, they have been accorded the same level of responsibility as pilots to not take down airplanes. I don't think that's smart at all.
#5229
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Posts: 688
Sounds like we were better off with the old bid packets and having the schedules come out on the 16th. Not our problem that Mesa does not have the staff due to FA awards either. So much control has been given to Mesa with PBS it is sad. Awards should be out the next day. No excuses. They should have had the final roster figured out on the 16th. PBS is a computer and I understand the run takes a moment for captains who do IOE but they should have that ready to go and set by the 17th. Run the captain awards, then run the FO awards. One day is way more then enough for this. During the test it was out within an hour. Before PBS, Mesa had to have the lines created well before the 16th so we could bid on them. So this excuse that they need even more time with PBS is not for the FA's, but rather to tighten the screws on us with unstacking/coverage awards due to Mesa's poor planning/running even leaner then they did back in the days with bid packets. The FA's are bidding on the same pairings we are so it really doesn't matter at all, they just run with less staff now then they did. Next contract make PBS out within a day on the 17th. Then they can hire people to do just the pilots, and have their own people for the FA's. Make them spend more money in the Schedules dept like we want so we can have our schedules on the 17-18th and can actually plan our lives for next month. I had my schedules on the 16th with the old bid packets and if Mesa had not planned enough pilots, they ended up with reserve lines without any pilots awarded it. Then they JA'ed at least the open time where as now we are unstacked (coverage awards) at straight time. That is sad. Amazing how now it takes 7 more days with a much more sophisticated system all due to the FA's and rosters....hmm. Oh and the rosters should have been figured out and published by the 16th. There should be no final rosters after this. I don't buy this excuse you have given. Sorry MAGPBS. You have not convinced me and kinda sound like a company man. Lets present the real facts and not excuses for the company.
Wow, just wow. I'm guessing you never dealt with the paper bids. I get WAY better schedules then I ever did with paper and that includes when I was on reserve.
As far as bashing magpbs I'm going to assume you have never bothered to have him work with you. Ask any pilot who has had their bid modified, or build or explained to them by him and you will get nothing but praise. If there's anyone in alpa that the pilot group doesn't hate its him and there's plenty of people that can back that up. Go to one of his training sessions and ask to be shown how a bid is build. Your black helicopters will get parked real quickly.
#5230
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Position: Airbus FO
Posts: 279
Wow, just wow. I'm guessing you never dealt with the paper bids. I get WAY better schedules then I ever did with paper and that includes when I was on reserve.
As far as bashing magpbs I'm going to assume you have never bothered to have him work with you. Ask any pilot who has had their bid modified, or build or explained to them by him and you will get nothing but praise. If there's anyone in alpa that the pilot group doesn't hate its him and there's plenty of people that can back that up. Go to one of his training sessions and ask to be shown how a bid is build. Your black helicopters will get parked real quickly.
As far as bashing magpbs I'm going to assume you have never bothered to have him work with you. Ask any pilot who has had their bid modified, or build or explained to them by him and you will get nothing but praise. If there's anyone in alpa that the pilot group doesn't hate its him and there's plenty of people that can back that up. Go to one of his training sessions and ask to be shown how a bid is build. Your black helicopters will get parked real quickly.
Sounds like you really love Mesa how it is and there is no way it could get better...
Last edited by wt932051; 03-19-2016 at 06:28 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post