Search

Notices
Mesa Airlines Regional Airline

New Mesa Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-06-2015, 07:54 PM
  #2821  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 519
Default

I hear ya. Mesa is going to have to step up their game, and soon. Xjet is looking to increase FO pay by Jan, and Envoy already has a bonus (which is silly, IMHO), but that will leave Mesa in the dust pretty soon. Hopefully they rally with increased FO pay, and stay in the game!

Originally Posted by iFlyRC
As they should if they have 1000 121 time, almost a street hire CA position, maybe 5 or 6 months as an FO.
Every pilot needs to evaluate the situation for themselves, and go for the opportunities they want. Pay aside, Mesa is extremely chill place to work.
BobJenkins is offline  
Old 12-06-2015, 08:04 PM
  #2822  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,623
Default

Originally Posted by BobJenkins
That's a dumb thing to say. There are people leaving other regionals to go to Mesa, as well. The grass is always greener, amirite?
Maybe last year. I don't think anyone with experience and knowledge of the industry is making a lateral to Mesa anymore. I was referencing the fact that all these captains keep saying every FO they fly with is on the way out. Not a good sign. The quick upgrade only lasts as long as new hires keep coming in the door. The only chance for Mesa to get improvements to their contract is if hiring becomes a problem.
word302 is offline  
Old 12-06-2015, 08:39 PM
  #2823  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 555
Default

Originally Posted by word302
Maybe last year. I don't think anyone with experience and knowledge of the industry is making a lateral to Mesa anymore. I was referencing the fact that all these captains keep saying every FO they fly with is on the way out. Not a good sign. The quick upgrade only lasts as long as new hires keep coming in the door. The only chance for Mesa to get improvements to their contract is if hiring becomes a problem.

Believing that every FO is leaving because you read it on APC is cray. Going back to zero at another regional isn't even all that great a move.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
RV5M is offline  
Old 12-06-2015, 08:54 PM
  #2824  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Posts: 34
Default

I had a Commuter DH pilot today who said that the 145s they are taking on are going to IAD. Thats a lot more RJs in Dulles, and not a lot of room. 700s to EWR sounding more likely....
cleareddirect13 is offline  
Old 12-07-2015, 12:44 AM
  #2825  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 977
Default

Originally Posted by avi8tor614
Neither is true. New Ejets going to IAH to support the 8 new cities in Mexico that United is opening up. Ejets will continue to "flow" through IAD with 2 staying the night. For now no Ejets in IAD MX hangar to small "confirmed" and they want to keep operations seperate. 700's in no danger of being moved for forsee able future. *Sources IAD station manager, head of MX in IAH, and Mechanic in IAD. These people would be in the loop if changes were taking place in the next 6 months.

Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk
My source at United SOC (and within Mesa--a person higher than your mechanics' tales) say otherwise.

United is loving the EJet/East Coast service in IAD--they want that to continue. They are more likely to do new-market Mexico flying with Skywest 700s, which makes sense since we're taking over longer-haul previously-Skywest 700 routes like IAH-ONT. Skywest 700s can easily compete with AA 900 service out of DFW on most Mexico markets large and small.

Also--it's averaging closer to 5 RON Ejets in IAD a night--not 2. It's not a big deal if there aren't any EJets "in the hangar." We regularly have service checks done in OKC and I believe IAD. They're new planes--they don't need a lot of touch-time or parts in IAH to keep flying.

Lastly, the next 15 EJets were originally Republic deliveries. United and Republic are still working out what they can't staff and what they can, but any regional attempting to stop the bleeding will obviously push hard to cut the most problematic portions of their schedule from the system first...Republic Q/Ejet east coast flying is the most likely candidate for replacement by an another operation.

My source says we'll have 700s or EJets in EWR by the end of 2016--I'm willing to put money on it. Maintenance always hears about these things after the fact--not before. You can ship parts on FedEx last-minute on a much tighter deadline than a crew for a 4-day

Last edited by flapshalfspeed; 12-07-2015 at 12:55 AM.
flapshalfspeed is offline  
Old 12-07-2015, 07:51 AM
  #2826  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: Captain
Posts: 1,561
Default

Originally Posted by flapshalfspeed
My source at United SOC (and within Mesa--a person higher than your mechanics' tales) say otherwise.

United is loving the EJet/East Coast service in IAD--they want that to continue. They are more likely to do new-market Mexico flying with Skywest 700s, which makes sense since we're taking over longer-haul previously-Skywest 700 routes like IAH-ONT. Skywest 700s can easily compete with AA 900 service out of DFW on most Mexico markets large and small.

Also--it's averaging closer to 5 RON Ejets in IAD a night--not 2. It's not a big deal if there aren't any EJets "in the hangar." We regularly have service checks done in OKC and I believe IAD. They're new planes--they don't need a lot of touch-time or parts in IAH to keep flying.

Lastly, the next 15 EJets were originally Republic deliveries. United and Republic are still working out what they can't staff and what they can, but any regional attempting to stop the bleeding will obviously push hard to cut the most problematic portions of their schedule from the system first...Republic Q/Ejet east coast flying is the most likely candidate for replacement by an another operation.

My source says we'll have 700s or EJets in EWR by the end of 2016--I'm willing to put money on it. Maintenance always hears about these things after the fact--not before. You can ship parts on FedEx last-minute on a much tighter deadline than a crew for a 4-day




My sources say UAL is at max 700/175s at 255 and in order to add 175s they have to park 700s

A new TA on a 2 year extension has no scope relief either
So somehow 700s must go in order for 175s to show up

Or they have to order more narrow body aircraft to increase the 175s


So don't dream more growth , replacement of a/c from now on

Your upper management has been lying to you about growth
Sniper66 is offline  
Old 12-07-2015, 07:59 AM
  #2827  
Living the Dream
 
deltajuliet's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,795
Default

Let's not go to EWR.
deltajuliet is offline  
Old 12-07-2015, 08:32 AM
  #2828  
sippin' dat koolaid
 
Joined APC: Jun 2013
Position: gear slinger
Posts: 982
Default

Originally Posted by deltajuliet
Let's not go to EWR.
Please for the love of kale no more east coast flying. ORD or DEN would be nice. LAX/SFO even nicer but we all know Skyworst has a death grip on United's west coast regional feed.

I just don't get why Mesa can't solidify domiciles like other regionals have done.
tinman1 is offline  
Old 12-07-2015, 08:48 AM
  #2829  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,602
Default

Originally Posted by Sniper66
My sources say UAL is at max 700/175s at 255 and in order to add 175s they have to park 700s

A new TA on a 2 year extension has no scope relief either
So somehow 700s must go in order for 175s to show up

Or they have to order more narrow body aircraft to increase the 175s


So don't dream more growth , replacement of a/c from now on

Your upper management has been lying to you about growth
Where did he say anything about growth...Hes just talking about moving aircraft around.
NovemberBravo is offline  
Old 12-07-2015, 09:33 AM
  #2830  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: Captain
Posts: 1,561
Default

Originally Posted by NovemberBravo
Where did he say anything about growth...Hes just talking about moving aircraft around.


15 Ejets from Republic
Sniper66 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nwa757
Regional
31
07-31-2018 04:58 PM
winglet
Regional
45
12-18-2008 05:06 PM
Past V1
Regional
6
06-23-2008 08:40 AM
Squawk8800
Regional
5
04-08-2008 08:50 PM
calcapt
Regional
17
12-27-2006 06:34 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices