Search

Notices
Mesa Airlines Regional Airline

New Mesa Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-06-2015, 10:25 AM
  #1051  
Gets Weekends Off
 
iFlyRC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,198
Default

Originally Posted by deltajuliet
More food for thought. The pilot group only gets $14.7 million over the next 5 years. A CRJ900 costs $39 million, and JO just bought how many?
You mean, how many did the lender buy? Everything is financed.
Now, they did just spend 500,000$ getting Casper the friendly 200 flying again, and had budgeted 1 million originally for that.
Rumor is, there are more 900's coming our way if JO can convince the lenders.
iFlyRC is offline  
Old 09-06-2015, 10:37 AM
  #1052  
Gets Weekends Off
 
iFlyRC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,198
Default

Originally Posted by Q400winner
Mesa is not in the same situation as Eagle. Of course, they don't have money for a better contract. In the future, they need to learn to make money so that their employees can keep up with the rest. If they cannot, they should close the doors. The only people that disagree with me are people that have spent 15+ years slaving away and are too afraid to make a jump or one that doesn't make sense now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I have not been here 15+ years, but I've experienced being without a job on the street, and it was a traumatic experience for me, one that ultimately made me a much better person. I feel like I have job security at Mesa, I get along with everyone, and I am doing a fine job for them. Until something better comes along, I want my tenure at Mesa to be MY decision to leave, not the company going out of business, and I except the fact that it is a possibility that I may become a lifer at Mesa, even if I don't want to be one. A paycheck today, even if it is smaller than my peers elsewhere, is still a million times better than not having one. I do not want to experience that ever again. The younger guys can talk all they want about how they want Mesa to either pay industry standard or go out of business, my life experience has taught me to not play that foolish game.
The truth to the matter is, as a CA at Mesa, my QOL has NEVER been as good as it is now, and it provides everything I need for my family, except for decent health care... Thats the one thing that truly stings my family.
We can vote no all we want, we are not going to get decent health care without a major disruption, and only if it is clear that disruption was caused by our lack of decent health care.
iFlyRC is offline  
Old 09-06-2015, 10:49 AM
  #1053  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,666
Default

Originally Posted by deltajuliet
Another idea would be to just boost everyone's hourly rate by $2.50 - that's what 14.7 million over 5 years would get everyone. Or $2.00 and use the rest for other improvements. That said, I think that's still woefully underpaid and still wouldn't vote for that. Also, am I the only one that thinks Captains should all get paid the highest 900 rate for all equipment? If a guy flies out of Dulles, the job isn't any different than if he flies out of Texas or Arizona.


The pilot shortage alone will give all regional pilots substantially more leverage in the next few years. Look at the fundamental difference in management philosophy between Mesa and SkyWest. JO kept first year FO rates right where they were. SkyWest put the bulk of their new contract in first year rates, even adding a clause allowing management to increase it to $36.50 if they had trouble recruiting. What a contrast. SkyWest understands they'll have difficulty recruiting over the next couple years and the pilots will gain significantly more leverage. JO has been insulated from that thought process because he's been able to fill classes. What happens when he can't?

One other idea: regional unions shouldn't publicize how low their pay rates are relative to Horizon or SkyWest during negotiations. We should advertise to the public and Congress that we make 20-30% as much as the same position at United/Delta/American.
When JO can't fill classes, THEN he will do something about it, but as he has been very candid about all along is that as long as he can bring people in the door, he doesn't have to pay more. Skywest hasn't had the "quick upgrade" carrot to dangle so they've had to increase their pay before we do. Are they more proactive than we are: yes. Mesa has always had a reactive management style.

Voting no isn't going to accelerate our getting paid any better. The only thing that will increase our pay will be not getting enough people in the door. Only once that happens will the company have ANY incentive to start fixing the problem.

The company is not prohibited from coming back to the table to negotiate higher pay rates during the term of the contract. That's what LOA's are all about. A lot of the TA is actually LOA language we've been living under since 2012 that is now being put into the main body of the contract.

Lastly, you want higher pay rates in lieu of quality of life improvements. Apparently when the union surveyed the pilot group a few years ago, the overall feeling was to focus on quality of life improvements at the time, so that's what they negotiated.
Xdashdriver is offline  
Old 09-06-2015, 10:54 AM
  #1054  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,666
Default

Originally Posted by Q400winner
Mesa is not in the same situation as Eagle. Of course, they don't have money for a better contract. In the future, they need to learn to make money so that their employees can keep up with the rest. If they cannot, they should close the doors. The only people that disagree with me are people that have spent 15+ years slaving away and are too afraid to make a jump or one that doesn't make sense now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Our voting no isn't going to force Mesa into learning that lesson. Only not being able to hire people will (eventually) either force Mesa out of business or force it to pay competitively.
Xdashdriver is offline  
Old 09-06-2015, 11:43 AM
  #1055  
Chief Engineer
 
ScottyDo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Position: CRJ FO
Posts: 815
Default

Originally Posted by Xdashdriver
Apparently when the union surveyed the pilot group a few years ago, the overall feeling was to focus on quality of life improvements at the time, so that's what they negotiated.
They didn't do a very good job.
ScottyDo is offline  
Old 09-06-2015, 11:50 AM
  #1056  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 304
Default

And now things have changed. New guys coming into the industry are drowning in debt. Now it's, FYPM.
Skyler02 is offline  
Old 09-06-2015, 11:50 AM
  #1057  
Gets Weekends Off
 
iFlyRC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,198
Default

Originally Posted by ScottyDo
They didn't do a very good job.
I don't see you volunteering on your days off to help the pilot group. Up until I went to the road show, I really couldn't put any faces to names. Come to find out one of the negotiators is a CA that I enjoyed flying with, who is a good person.
iFlyRC is offline  
Old 09-06-2015, 11:50 AM
  #1058  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 304
Default

"Our voting no isn't going to force Mesa into learning that lesson. Only not being able to hire people will (eventually) either force Mesa out of business or force it to pay competitively."

Your vote IS going to make a difference. It is so sad that some in Mesa's pilot group are so brainwashed by this abusive industry, that they don't realize the power they have. Your skills and knowledge are in great demand. You have been abused by this industry for so long that you don't even see that.

If you believe that running out of qualified applicants is the only way to return the pilot profession to a viable profession that will entice people to go through the extensive training, time, and money commitment, that it takes to get here, then stand by. Because whether you realize it or not, the industry IS there. Educate yourself. Your skills are in very high demand.
Skyler02 is offline  
Old 09-06-2015, 12:04 PM
  #1059  
Gets Weekends Off
 
iFlyRC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,198
Default

Originally Posted by Skyler02
"Our voting no isn't going to force Mesa into learning that lesson. Only not being able to hire people will (eventually) either force Mesa out of business or force it to pay competitively."

Your vote IS going to make a difference. It is so sad that some in Mesa's pilot group are so brainwashed by this abusive industry, that they don't realize the power they have. Your skills and knowledge are in great demand. You have been abused by this industry for so long that you don't even see that.

If you believe that running out of qualified applicants is the only way to return the pilot profession to a viable profession that will entice people to go through the extensive training, time, and money commitment, that it takes to get here, then stand by. Because whether you realize it or not, the industry IS there. Educate yourself. Your skills are in very high demand.
When they are knocking down my door, I will believe you. Fact is, the people willing to pay me the most right now happens to be Mesa.
iFlyRC is offline  
Old 09-06-2015, 12:20 PM
  #1060  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,666
Default

Originally Posted by Skyler02
"Our voting no isn't going to force Mesa into learning that lesson. Only not being able to hire people will (eventually) either force Mesa out of business or force it to pay competitively."

Your vote IS going to make a difference. It is so sad that some in Mesa's pilot group are so brainwashed by this abusive industry, that they don't realize the power they have. Your skills and knowledge are in great demand. You have been abused by this industry for so long that you don't even see that.

If you believe that running out of qualified applicants is the only way to return the pilot profession to a viable profession that will entice people to go through the extensive training, time, and money commitment, that it takes to get here, then stand by. Because whether you realize it or not, the industry IS there. Educate yourself. Your skills are in very high demand.
If there was money on the table at Mesa then I would agree with you wholeheartedly: vote no. The reality is there is no such money there and we have expended all the leverage we have right now. Once the pilot shortage hits our class dates, then we will have more leverage. Voting no will not gain us any leverage at this point in time at this company.

IF we have so much power by voting "no", tell me what will this power produce, and how?
Xdashdriver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nwa757
Regional
31
07-31-2018 04:58 PM
winglet
Regional
45
12-18-2008 05:06 PM
Past V1
Regional
6
06-23-2008 08:40 AM
Squawk8800
Regional
5
04-08-2008 08:50 PM
calcapt
Regional
17
12-27-2006 06:34 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices