Search

Notices
Mesa Airlines Regional Airline

Mesa

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-12-2013, 07:39 PM
  #961  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: South Paw
Posts: 630
Default

Study till 7pm. Buzzed at 9pm, asleep by 10pm, 8 hours sleep then to class. Not near an aircraft the next day. What's wrong with that?
skillett is offline  
Old 12-12-2013, 07:59 PM
  #962  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NightHawk's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: line...reserve...furlough
Posts: 134
Default

Originally Posted by MALB
I ran into the current class at Mesa and well the night before the smell of alcohol was pouring into the lobby. Lets just say it didn't look good at 9PM for a 7AM start the next day.
Oh No! You mean they had only 10 hours to sober up before getting behind a desk? At least they did something together, a sign of teamwork. You sound like the guy who spends the whole time alone in your room by your self, looking down on others. Nobody wants to spend a 4 day with a hater like you, good luck.
NightHawk is offline  
Old 12-12-2013, 08:06 PM
  #963  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: South Paw
Posts: 630
Default

Originally Posted by squall line
The trick is past practice and what the company is willing to do. Consider the 145's when we had them. They were only 50 seat. Correct me if I'm wrong, but CRJ CA's were unable to bid 145, but 145 CA could bid CRJ. The CRJ was considered higher paying equipment. The company will seek cost savings with bidding aircraft so I'm guessing CRJ CA's will not be able to bid 175 just as explained above due to number of training events.

There is a GIR however since the company believes they can pay vacation and rsv at 50 seat rates when a pilot is based on the mainland where 50 seaters do not exist. As I've heard, they can't have their cake and eat it too. They will have to cave on something, but right now it's hard telling what/where. Stay tuned.....
That's why I brought this up. If they are going to put up fences then the base pay for CLT and PHX would have to be 900 pay. What about Iad and Ord? They are 76 seat aircraft. Equal size. Does the seating capacity have to be more to move over. We will only have 38 aircraft with 79 seats for future scope. How could they get around this or can they?
skillett is offline  
Old 12-12-2013, 08:15 PM
  #964  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Navmode's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 774
Default

Originally Posted by squall line
There is a GIR however since the company believes they can pay vacation and rsv at 50 seat rates when a pilot is based on the mainland where 50 seaters do not exist. As I've heard, they can't have their cake and eat it too. They will have to cave on something, but right now it's hard telling what/where. Stay tuned.....
Technically there's a 200 in CLT; even if it hasn't flown yet. With the closing of OGG/LIH/KOA, and the shrinking of HNL, I wouldn't be surprised if the 200 fleet were in the works to fly under a different partner.
Navmode is offline  
Old 12-12-2013, 08:35 PM
  #965  
Gets Weekends Off
 
sidestep's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: F0
Posts: 404
Default

Originally Posted by Navmode
Technically there's a 200 in CLT; even if it hasn't flown yet. With the closing of OGG/LIH/KOA, and the shrinking of HNL, I wouldn't be surprised if the 200 fleet were in the works to fly under a different partner.
How many pilots left in Hawaii? All now in HNL?
sidestep is offline  
Old 12-12-2013, 08:41 PM
  #966  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: South Paw
Posts: 630
Default

Originally Posted by Navmode
Technically there's a 200 in CLT; even if it hasn't flown yet. With the closing of OGG/LIH/KOA, and the shrinking of HNL, I wouldn't be surprised if the 200 fleet were in the works to fly under a different partner.
Yes I understand two training events, thanks. Even with 1 CRJ 200 in CLT or wherever, that's 50 seat base pay. I would think Mesa's best route would be to get rid of all CRJ 200's and make the base pay 76 seats to avoid fence crossing. I wouldn't be surprised if Mesa talks United into making one of these Emb 175's a 50 seat extra first class airplane to save them millions in training or higher base pay. I'm sure Mesa would cover the lost revenue on this one airplane to save them a ton of money in the long run. Never mind that. If you lose 26 seats of revenue with higher fuel burn. And you know you will never fill all of first class. 8 flights a day min, that would be pretty damn expensive. I think they're in a rock and a hard place. Either pay at least 76 seat pay rates min. Or let us cross the fence for greener pastures. I just hope that they have one bid with a chance to cross. Got some good buddies that would like that shorter commute.

Last edited by skillett; 12-12-2013 at 08:53 PM. Reason: Re thought
skillett is offline  
Old 12-12-2013, 09:26 PM
  #967  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: underemployed
Posts: 190
Default

Originally Posted by Slats
Oh wow that PIC time is sooooooo cool. However, we've had numerous FOs hired by mainline despite their lack of PIC. Let me guess, you have busted checkrides, maybe a DUI, no formal education ect... Which is why you're narrowing down your choices.

Food for thought, getting to mainline is getting harder an harder as regionals vote in concessions to fly larger aircraft. United is parking 757s, American is ordering 175s and more 900s, Delta is looking for carriers that fly 175s. Why??? Because we're cheap labor!!! You'll fly the same routes compared to mainline for 1/4 of the cost!! wake up, do some research. Retirements will spur hiring but hell, at this rate mainline can furlough their guys have them rehired and PSA or Mesa and staff those RJs that are flying ALL domestic flights. All while mainline focuses it's fleet on International flying. Get a clue
Sooo you have had numerous FO's hired with no PIC. Would you disagree that PIC makes it easier to get hired? By a lot? Now for your ridiculous assumptions about someone you don't know... No failures. No DUI. Associates degree and taking classes. Will be done in 2 years or less with a bachelors easily. Then you proceed to talk about the challenges of getting to mainline. Wait a minute... Two sentences ago FO's were getting hired. Guess it isn't all that hard after all? Maybe you just need to justify why YOU can't get a job? That would explain a lot. I know people at EVERY major airline in the US. The two chief pilots and one recruiter I know personally all tell me that with PIC I will get an interview and at delta and united I need to finish the degree and then get the 1000 pic to get a call. I'm not special. I am not the only one that knows people. Not by a long shot. MOST pilots that take career progression seriously know a lot more people at mainline than I do. This business is networking. Perhaps that is why you are still here on a regional forum criticizing people that are likely to get the call before you. I would help out anyone I could to progress in their career. Even you! When I move on wherever it is I won't forget this. If you don't network you will retire on an RJ and while there is NOTHING WRONG with that IF that is what you want, it isn't for me. I do not want to work at the regional level any longer than I need to. The recipe is simple and nobody can deny this. No failures, accidents, violations, or dui's with a degree and pic properly networked will get you calls. It isn't rocket science. Sad thing is, outside of the forum here if I were on your jumpseat and you said, "I want to work at xyz airline" I could probably give you someone to call that you could add to your networking Rolodex that would help you out. And before you say, "no you wouldn't do that..." Yes I would. I don't have a lot of flight time. Chances are I help you out, when I need the help you would help me if I was the one that got you the mainline job. That's the way it works. Backscratching per se. I hate having to "defend" myself here as I am a pretty low key easy going guy just trying to make my way in this business the best I can, but the personal attacks are a little irritating. Even if it is APC and it is to be expected. I know that for me to achieve the goals I want I need PIC time. That's what I'm after. It's that simple.
Chrisw is offline  
Old 12-12-2013, 09:28 PM
  #968  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: South Paw
Posts: 630
Default

Originally Posted by squall line
The trick is past practice and what the company is willing to do. Consider the 145's when we had them. They were only 50 seat. Correct me if I'm wrong, but CRJ CA's were unable to bid 145, but 145 CA could bid CRJ. The CRJ was considered higher paying equipment.
I do believe this was the case. Then what is holding them back from just saying the CRJ has a higher earning potential therefore you cannot bid into the EMB 175? Because there is no 50 seat base pay for the EMB 175 type? I assume this is what the problem is.
skillett is offline  
Old 12-12-2013, 09:57 PM
  #969  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: South Paw
Posts: 630
Default

Originally Posted by TallFlyer

As long as mainline groups continue to take back scope your scenario is unlikely.
No one is taking back scope. They are losing it in bankruptcy. As much as the mainline folks say "hey, we need to save our flying it belongs to us and our brethren's". The top 60 percent of that seniority list is set to retire in the near future. With retirement cost rising rapidly, they will take that pay raise to keep their lifestyle. They have lost their retirement (or could) and have seen their pay decrease over 40 percent. It would be noble but not in their best interest.

Last edited by skillett; 12-12-2013 at 09:59 PM. Reason: There to their
skillett is offline  
Old 12-12-2013, 10:13 PM
  #970  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: South Paw
Posts: 630
Default

Is PSA the new Mesa? Damn already. That was not even 15 minutes of fame. Expect the whipsaw to continue.

Last edited by skillett; 12-12-2013 at 10:49 PM. Reason: Completely insulting mankind
skillett is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nwa757
Regional
31
07-31-2018 04:58 PM
AirbornPegasus
Regional
14
04-08-2009 07:17 PM
Spanky189
Regional
10
05-16-2008 09:38 AM
familyguy
Regional
49
04-11-2008 12:03 AM
LOW FUEL
Regional
104
08-17-2007 04:41 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices