Mesa
06-07-2015, 06:48 PM
#8271
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Position: 175 Left
Posts: 1,539
Incorrect, only way contractually for a CRJ CA to bid E75 CA is if both aircraft have an IAD base and there is a closure of CRJ or bump and flush, allowing a CRJ CA to bid E75 CA if their seniority can hold it to avoid being bumped out of the base.
06-07-2015, 08:39 PM
#8272
Chief Engineer
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Position: CRJ FO
Posts: 815
Way easier: http://mesanet.mesa-air.com/CrewKiosk/ftWebDocs/
Then just type in your origin and flight number. Also works on the iPad, which FTWeb doesn't.
Then just type in your origin and flight number. Also works on the iPad, which FTWeb doesn't.
06-07-2015, 09:29 PM
#8273
Chief Engineer
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Position: CRJ FO
Posts: 815
Anybody know what happened with one of our 700s going off the runway in BUF? Only report I've seen so far is that they circled a bunch of times then could not get the plane stopped on the runway. Flap failure?
06-07-2015, 11:40 PM
#8274
Covfefe
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,001
"The pilot told the passengers that a strong gust of wind carried the plane off the runway."
"After emergency crews arrived, fire officials assured the 69 passengers that there were no mechanical issues with the aircraft and that they were not in any danger."
That said, I normally don't trust the news as a good source of info for aircraft incidents.
06-08-2015, 12:03 AM
#8275
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Posts: 688
That would be a contractual way wouldn't it. Statements not incorrect
06-08-2015, 12:18 AM
#8276
Covfefe
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,001
The more I read about this 700 off-roading experience, the more questions I have. Their flightaware tracks are interesting as well. I'm not judging, just curious about why they landed on 32 (7161') with what appears to be a 15-22kt almost direct crosswind and possibly slight tailwind with a wet runway when they could have had 23 (8829') with an almost direct headwind. Maybe the storm didn't allow for an approach to 23 but the radar at the time looks like it was viable. Glad I wasn't there to see.
06-08-2015, 05:02 AM
#8277
Line Holder
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Posts: 66
Hate to say it but we will see more incidents like this as more captains upgrade with the bare mins
06-08-2015, 05:40 AM
#8278
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: CL-65 CA
Posts: 246
The more I read about this 700 off-roading experience, the more questions I have. Their flightaware tracks are interesting as well. I'm not judging, just curious about why they landed on 32 (7161') with what appears to be a 15-22kt almost direct crosswind and possibly slight tailwind with a wet runway when they could have had 23 (8829') with an almost direct headwind. Maybe the storm didn't allow for an approach to 23 but the radar at the time looks like it was viable. Glad I wasn't there to see.
It just happened. How much could you have read?
What are the facts? You don't know and the media surely doesn't know either! Typical.
06-08-2015, 05:40 AM
#8279
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Position: Mannin' deez blenps
Posts: 193
-rspct
Last edited by Bumbaclot; 06-08-2015 at 05:51 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
