Mesa
#7364
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 89
CRJ to EJet upgrades: How much studying did you do ahead of training? And did the training experience require perpetual cramming, or was it more manageable? Just trying to gauge whether I'll be able to devote any time to a couple other things I need to pay attention to. Of course, I plan to try hard and study, but if there's a free hour or two every couple days, I was hoping to use that time.
#7367
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 89
Please understand an upgrade is more than switching seats and getting paid a little more. ALL the responsibility is on you. You and you alone should WANT to put forth 100% toward being a professional captain. If you're not there, no big deal; just hold off your bid in till you're ready for that responsibility. That is being a professional. If I interpreted your question incorrectly, I apologize. The EJet is an awesome plane. Personally, I don't think I'll go back to the CRJ. Schedules are much better on this side compared to the CRJ side.
#7368
Pertaining to EJET:
Just ask yourself am I 100% committed to this? If your answer is no, then why are you even bothering? Yes, guys have failed out of the program. Yes, guys have failed and/or struggled with various other assets of the program. In my years of experience the ones who were not there mentally or carrying their share of the group study are going to fail somewhere early. But no, things are not super intense at training.
Then again we are utilizing different facilities (YYZ,DFW and PHX) so I cannot speak for the updates. You'll have time to relax I believe, but my advice is to get all the materials in advance. Cover it all, flash cards, CFM, GOM, limitations, etc. minimize the cramming. You should have plenty of time to do those things you list.
-rspct
Just ask yourself am I 100% committed to this? If your answer is no, then why are you even bothering? Yes, guys have failed out of the program. Yes, guys have failed and/or struggled with various other assets of the program. In my years of experience the ones who were not there mentally or carrying their share of the group study are going to fail somewhere early. But no, things are not super intense at training.
Then again we are utilizing different facilities (YYZ,DFW and PHX) so I cannot speak for the updates. You'll have time to relax I believe, but my advice is to get all the materials in advance. Cover it all, flash cards, CFM, GOM, limitations, etc. minimize the cramming. You should have plenty of time to do those things you list.
-rspct
#7369
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 977
Absolutely. I've been a pax captain before. I get it. Just trying to understand where/when I might be able to work on something, if at all. I mean, others must talk to there families, work out, go to dinner, etc. If anything, it's probably good to get your mind off the airplane every now and then. When are things super intense? When do they slow down a little?
It's like any other initial type rating on any turbine equipment. Standard 142/initial new-to-equipment syllabus: 80 hours of groundschool M-F 8-5. Written test. A few days of procedures training/system integration. Typically a break of 1-4 weeks. 8 sim sessions with lots of downtime. Checkride/LOFT/OBS flights/IOE/Fed ride.
The only differences between the FO course and the CA course are: it's left seat, there's a few extra maneuvers, they grill you more on PIC decisionmaking, and the orals are harder. This is standard 121 training stuff--if you've flown for an airline before you should know all of the above already.
And if you have any doubts that you aren't ready--you aren't. This isn't a small responsibility or easy thing to do (and shouldn't be).
#7370
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 977
Noticed that one CA who downgraded in IAD with the sole intention of re-upgrading to IAH popped up on the IAH CA roster (and IAH PBS award).
B/c said CA does not appear on any published awards, and was technically seat-locked on the RJ for 36 months (until I believe 2016), I guess she complained, and the company backed down and waived her equipment lock?
Anyone know how she pulled this off? Seems like the establishment of a past practice of the company waiving equipment locks for anyone who wants to status displace (CA to FO) during any bump & flush, solely to circumvent the block on CRJ->IAH
B/c said CA does not appear on any published awards, and was technically seat-locked on the RJ for 36 months (until I believe 2016), I guess she complained, and the company backed down and waived her equipment lock?
Anyone know how she pulled this off? Seems like the establishment of a past practice of the company waiving equipment locks for anyone who wants to status displace (CA to FO) during any bump & flush, solely to circumvent the block on CRJ->IAH
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post