Mesa
03-19-2015, 04:53 AM
#7101
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Position: Mannin' deez blenps
Posts: 193
EJET vs CRJ
apply said aircraft type: E175 (ERJ170/190) you will upon reaching and flying said aircraft see a difference. Said "Present Value" will have gone up quite substantially.
-rspct
apply said aircraft type: E175 (ERJ170/190) you will upon reaching and flying said aircraft see a difference. Said "Present Value" will have gone up quite substantially.
-rspct
03-19-2015, 05:42 AM
#7103
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Posts: 310
In mesa's case, I would take an ejet if I didn't live in Phx or Dallas already, due in large part to base seniority becoming way better on the e175 for anyone getting in right now anyway. All the early ejet hires will be upgrading soon (most are prior 121) and they are still hiring for the remaining 11 airplanes. No brainer if you want to live in Houston.
03-19-2015, 08:10 AM
#7104
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,666
That can't happen.
B. Scope
1. Except as provided in Section 1.B.2., all present and future flying of any form performed in and for the service of the Company shall be performed by pilots on the Mesa Air Group Pilot System Seniority List in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The phrase “present and future flying of any form performed in and for the service of the Company” includes without limitation all such flying 1) on the Company’s aircraft (whether leased or owned), or 2) under the Company’s operational control, including wet leases and contracting for other carriers or entities (government, military or commercial).
2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1.B.1., above, the Company may assign or contract out revenue flying for a period of sixty (60) days during the term of this Agreement if a) such conduct is necessary to accomplish the needs of the service of the Company, and b) the Company does not have sufficient aircraft and pilots to perform the revenue flying assigned or contracted out, and c) no pilot on the Mesa Air Group Pilots System Seniority List is furloughed, or remains on furlough, while the company contracts out revenue flying.
3. The Company shall not create or acquire an “alter ego” to avoid the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
B. Scope
1. Except as provided in Section 1.B.2., all present and future flying of any form performed in and for the service of the Company shall be performed by pilots on the Mesa Air Group Pilot System Seniority List in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The phrase “present and future flying of any form performed in and for the service of the Company” includes without limitation all such flying 1) on the Company’s aircraft (whether leased or owned), or 2) under the Company’s operational control, including wet leases and contracting for other carriers or entities (government, military or commercial).
2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1.B.1., above, the Company may assign or contract out revenue flying for a period of sixty (60) days during the term of this Agreement if a) such conduct is necessary to accomplish the needs of the service of the Company, and b) the Company does not have sufficient aircraft and pilots to perform the revenue flying assigned or contracted out, and c) no pilot on the Mesa Air Group Pilots System Seniority List is furloughed, or remains on furlough, while the company contracts out revenue flying.
3. The Company shall not create or acquire an “alter ego” to avoid the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
03-19-2015, 08:22 AM
#7105
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,602
Are we really debating 200 vs 175 right now...
03-19-2015, 08:45 AM
#7106
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2014
Posts: 558
Whatever pays the most. That's what aircraft I want to fly. End of story.
03-19-2015, 10:55 AM
#7107
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: CRJ CA
Posts: 180
My b*tching about the lack of new 700s/flying was just that b*tching. Don't take it so seriously, yo. We lost a lot of UA flying back in 2009 when ASA took it over and we parked all our 200s. Now we're getting a lot of those routes back again and losing our Texas flying (at least for a bit).
And for those who say that flying the 200 is like flying the 175... all I have to say is "Welcome to Mesa" obviously you've never flown a 200 on a hot day with no APU and climbed above FL200. -smh- Newbs...
03-19-2015, 11:48 AM
#7108
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 828
What's year one and two pay for the 175?
03-19-2015, 12:56 PM
#7110
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 455
Considering that regionals can't fill classes right now, the last thing UAL wants to see is cancellations for "no crew" at UAX. That is what happened with XJT that played a part in them losing all those 145's. I think we are going to start seeing more and more flying return to mainline, after all that is where the applicants are. 50 seaters should be parked no later than 5 years from now, CR7's not too far behind that, IMO.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
