Search

Notices
Mesa Airlines Regional Airline

Mesa

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-03-2015, 08:46 AM
  #5811  
Gets Weekends Off
 
24/48's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 455
Default

Originally Posted by flapshalfspeed
Find me an insurance company or leasing agency who will insure/lease a 787 to an operator allowing PICs with 800 hours SIC time on type.

NAI's Captain requirements are much, much higher than those of any US regional.

Your counterpoint is invalid.
Sure, insurance will be strict since it is a new type, however, the aircraft has been operating for some time and has established reliability, albeit somewhat blemished. Over time, when an air carrier builds up a good safety record with a certain type of aircraft, staffing them becomes a lot less restrictive.

Originally Posted by flapshalfspeed
Just to reinforce my statement that NAI's standards for PICs are much higher than US regionals' standards for PICs:

Minimum Requirements

  • JAA/EASA License
  • JAA/EASA medical Class one
  • 5000 hours total time
  • 2000 PIC hours on any Boeing aircraft
  • 500 hours on B787, B777, B767 or B747-400
  • Current B777, B767/B757, B747-400 or B737 type rating
  • Under 61 years old at date of application
  • Non type rated B777/787 pilots need to provide a training cost bond for three years, decreasing by 1/3 each year
And I'm not saying you'd be good to go as a street Captain, which are the minimums above.

To further my point above....once the aircraft has an established safety/reliability record with the air carrier the above in bold would most likely be the most restrictive to someone like yourself. I did add B787 because that is what the insurance company would do over time.
24/48 is offline  
Old 02-03-2015, 12:48 PM
  #5812  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Posts: 236
Default

Originally Posted by Bikingscott
Or...What if Mesa gets 175 (E-jet) AA flying.....
Or, what if J.O. Negotiates with Air France, and Mesa gets a couple of Concordes? Or what if Mesa brings back a Convair 990? How cool would that be?
No No No, I am waiting for Mesa to get a DC6, I feel like flying some round engines!
RB211 is offline  
Old 02-03-2015, 01:11 PM
  #5813  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2013
Posts: 287
Default

Lol I was thinking dc 8
PilotGuy77 is offline  
Old 02-03-2015, 02:05 PM
  #5814  
Gets Weekends Off
 
VanDriver208's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: Full Nelson
Posts: 369
Default

Eff that! I heard from J.O.'s brother's, cousin's, girlfriend's, dog that Mesa is getting a government contract to fly F/A-18s against ISIS in the Middle East at $20/flight hour! Pretty cool huh?
VanDriver208 is offline  
Old 02-03-2015, 04:48 PM
  #5815  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Posts: 236
Default

Originally Posted by VanDriver208
Eff that! I heard from J.O.'s brother's, cousin's, girlfriend's, dog that Mesa is getting a government contract to fly F/A-18s against ISIS in the Middle East at $20/flight hour! Pretty cool huh?
I heard that we would only get to use the standard iron bombs. If we want to use JDAM's, we are going to have to pay for that out of our paychecks.
RB211 is offline  
Old 02-03-2015, 04:52 PM
  #5816  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 977
Default

Originally Posted by Navmode
No

Filler
Yes

...filler
flapshalfspeed is offline  
Old 02-03-2015, 05:24 PM
  #5817  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 977
Default

Originally Posted by 24/48
Sure, insurance will be strict since it is a new type, however, the aircraft has been operating for some time and has established reliability, albeit somewhat blemished. Over time, when an air carrier builds up a good safety record with a certain type of aircraft, staffing them becomes a lot less restrictive.

And I'm not saying you'd be good to go as a street Captain, which are the minimums above.

To further my point above....once the aircraft has an established safety/reliability record with the air carrier the above in bold would most likely be the most restrictive to someone like yourself. I did add B787 because that is what the insurance company would do over time.
If I were in your seat, at your employer, with your career goals/expectations/outlook, I would certainly be concerned with cabotage/NAI/Emirates/Ethiad/pre-clearance facilities in Abu Dhabi.

However, as a single white male still riding right seat in an RJ after a decade in this game (due to no "fault" of my own), and after subsidizing the record profits of Delta and now AA/United by showing up to work as an RJ FO for my payrate all this time--well, I'm going to need more convincing that my interests are aligned with US legacies, instead of the foreign companies threatening your routes (but offering to interview/hire me/pay me a decent wage constantly, unlike your employer or any other US legacy at this time).

I'm all for solidarity with legacy pilots--but solidarity is a two-way street. If United starts hiring RJ drivers in significant quantities, or if ALPA national comes out with a firm stance that they'll never allow >age 65 to happen, or if your employer starts offering seniority numbers/guaranteed interviews to pilots at my company...maybe then I'll feel like my interests are starting to align with United's/Delta's re: NAI.

Until then, why would I donate money to ALPA PAC to protect legacy pilots from foreign competition, when legacy pilots (esp. at Delta) are making record bonuses and scoring solid pay/QOL improvements, due in part to my cheap labor subsidizing their cost structures?

Regional pilots directly subsidize the profits of legacies and the wages of legacy pilots, by providing lots of safe, cheap lift to fill up your 767/777--until there is some real movement from the regionals to the legacies, or some moves by legacy managements to address the absurd pay gap between us for doing the same exact job, I won't donate to ALPA-PAC--I'll be spending that money on interview prep/JAA books to study for interviews in the UAE--where I have an actual chance of making your wages and touching the left seat of a widebody in the next 30 years.

Last edited by flapshalfspeed; 02-03-2015 at 05:39 PM.
flapshalfspeed is offline  
Old 02-03-2015, 05:48 PM
  #5818  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Navmode's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 774
Default

Originally Posted by flapshalfspeed
Yes

...filler
You're right. The way I read the original post, it was a function of longevity similar to pay rate increases.
Navmode is offline  
Old 02-03-2015, 08:45 PM
  #5819  
Living the Dream
 
deltajuliet's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,795
Default

In that case, any idea what it is in 2015?

Originally Posted by flapshalfspeed
If I were in your seat, at your employer, with your career goals/expectations/outlook, I would certainly be concerned with cabotage/NAI/Emirates/Ethiad/pre-clearance facilities in Abu Dhabi.

However, as a single white male still riding right seat in an RJ after a decade in this game (due to no "fault" of my own), and after subsidizing the record profits of Delta and now AA/United by showing up to work as an RJ FO for my payrate all this time--well, I'm going to need more convincing that my interests are aligned with US legacies, instead of the foreign companies threatening your routes (but offering to interview/hire me/pay me a decent wage constantly, unlike your employer or any other US legacy at this time).

I'm all for solidarity with legacy pilots--but solidarity is a two-way street. If United starts hiring RJ drivers in significant quantities, or if ALPA national comes out with a firm stance that they'll never allow >age 65 to happen, or if your employer starts offering seniority numbers/guaranteed interviews to pilots at my company...maybe then I'll feel like my interests are starting to align with United's/Delta's re: NAI.

Until then, why would I donate money to ALPA PAC to protect legacy pilots from foreign competition, when legacy pilots (esp. at Delta) are making record bonuses and scoring solid pay/QOL improvements, due in part to my cheap labor subsidizing their cost structures?

Regional pilots directly subsidize the profits of legacies and the wages of legacy pilots, by providing lots of safe, cheap lift to fill up your 767/777--until there is some real movement from the regionals to the legacies, or some moves by legacy managements to address the absurd pay gap between us for doing the same exact job, I won't donate to ALPA-PAC--I'll be spending that money on interview prep/JAA books to study for interviews in the UAE--where I have an actual chance of making your wages and touching the left seat of a widebody in the next 30 years.
United Considering 10-Abreast 777 Retrofits | Commercial Aviation content from Aviation Week

Crap like this makes me think foreign competition domestically might not be a horrible thing. The trick would be to get Emirates over but not Norwegian.
deltajuliet is offline  
Old 02-03-2015, 11:39 PM
  #5820  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 977
Default

Originally Posted by deltajuliet
In that case, any idea what it is in 2015?



United Considering 10-Abreast 777 Retrofits | Commercial Aviation content from Aviation Week

Crap like this makes me think foreign competition domestically might not be a horrible thing. The trick would be to get Emirates over but not Norwegian.
For the record I want 24/48 to be right--I want to believe that I have a real shot at United, in the USA, and that I won't get stuck in the regionals this time around b/c of some sham bankruptcy, or moves by the grandpas to jack it on up to age 67 or 70, or some sort of scope relaxation allowing for 100 seaters at regionals. Or MPL/single-pilot cargo ops. I really, really want him to be right. But my experience has kind of beaten all of that hope outta me.

Last edited by flapshalfspeed; 02-04-2015 at 12:23 AM.
flapshalfspeed is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nwa757
Regional
31
07-31-2018 04:58 PM
AirbornPegasus
Regional
14
04-08-2009 07:17 PM
Spanky189
Regional
10
05-16-2008 09:38 AM
familyguy
Regional
49
04-11-2008 12:03 AM
LOW FUEL
Regional
104
08-17-2007 04:41 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices