Mesa
#5741
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,606
And please tell me how reading ice and cold weather policies, looking at a deicing holdover table, and following checklists for deice procedures necessitates multiple winters in the northeast to understand, and how flipping three switches to turn ice protection on when the ice warning comes on is so difficult. Shooting approaches down to mins, going missed, and doing it again or diverting isn't very difficult. Basic instrument students do it. We do it in sims and on the line. Sorry it took you so long to learn to feel comfortable doing...I feel for you.
Secondly, comparing a military pilot to you is irresponsible. First, an F22 pilot isn't flying passengers around. The military pilots that do fly pax have to go through a right seat program just like you and, unlike you, get intensive training once they reach their operational unit. Most of the flying they do has some kind of training objective. When's the last time you flew with an instructor who actually provided instruction? It happens frequently in the military world. It has happened less than a handful of times since I've started flying.
A military pilots at 250 hours has better airmanship than a civilian pilots with 1000 hours. You shouldn't be comparing yourself to them. You aren't even close to half they pilot an F22 driver is.
#5742
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: ERJ CA
Posts: 1,082
And there isn't a soul alive flying an F-22 with only 200 hours.
#5743
Line Holder
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 86
Sorry, but I have to call BS here. You're way overestimating the abilities of a brand-new military pilot. Yes, they receive great training, but they still have the experience and judgment of a 250 hour pilot. No way around that. A fresh-out-of-B-course fighter pilot poses a greater danger to his fellow pilots than to any adversary. Sure, they can fly the jet, but their SA is about zero at that point.
And there isn't a soul alive flying an F-22 with only 200 hours.
And there isn't a soul alive flying an F-22 with only 200 hours.
#5744
Says the guy who has near zero time flying in winter icing conditions. Summarizing flying in a winter storm as "read your manuals and turn your ice on--it's that easy" is EXACTLY why you shouldn't be a 121 Captain at this stage in the game. You're immaturity is dangerous.
If their seniority can hold it, and they meet the mins then let the training take it's course and they either pass or fail. If they fail and it is within their probationary year then they are out of a job most likely.
In 2000 we hiring street Captains on the E120 at ASA, and some of them came straight from Flight safety, or Riddle with an ATP written and the ATP requirements. They did just fine with no hull loses.
#5745
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,606
Does it need to be any harder? Seriously, I get that experience is important, but so is following company procedures and checklists. I have yet to fly an airliner that doesn't have detailed procedures on how to handle cold weather ops. You guys make it sound like you need to be a master aviator to recognize the situation that requires engine and/or wing anti-ice.
If their seniority can hold it, and they meet the mins then let the training take it's course and they either pass or fail. If they fail and it is within their probationary year then they are out of a job most likely.
In 2000 we hiring street Captains on the E120 at ASA, and some of them came straight from Flight safety, or Riddle with an ATP written and the ATP requirements. They did just fine with no hull loses.
If their seniority can hold it, and they meet the mins then let the training take it's course and they either pass or fail. If they fail and it is within their probationary year then they are out of a job most likely.
In 2000 we hiring street Captains on the E120 at ASA, and some of them came straight from Flight safety, or Riddle with an ATP written and the ATP requirements. They did just fine with no hull loses.
#5746
Banned
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: doggy style
Posts: 1,006
Originally Posted by CBreezy
You aren't an expert in the winter because you've read your winter ops manual and did IOE.
#5747
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,606
You're right. Experience is overrated. I say we put a 1500 pilot in the left seat of a 777. I mean, if you read your manuals, you've pretty much got this.
#5748
sippin' dat koolaid
Joined APC: Jun 2013
Position: gear slinger
Posts: 982
Does it need to be any harder? Seriously, I get that experience is important, but so is following company procedures and checklists. I have yet to fly an airliner that doesn't have detailed procedures on how to handle cold weather ops. You guys make it sound like you need to be a master aviator to recognize the situation that requires engine and/or wing anti-ice.
If their seniority can hold it, and they meet the mins then let the training take it's course and they either pass or fail. If they fail and it is within their probationary year then they are out of a job most likely.
In 2000 we hiring street Captains on the E120 at ASA, and some of them came straight from Flight safety, or Riddle with an ATP written and the ATP requirements. They did just fine with no hull loses.
If their seniority can hold it, and they meet the mins then let the training take it's course and they either pass or fail. If they fail and it is within their probationary year then they are out of a job most likely.
In 2000 we hiring street Captains on the E120 at ASA, and some of them came straight from Flight safety, or Riddle with an ATP written and the ATP requirements. They did just fine with no hull loses.
#5749
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 148
Gr8pe Ape said, in part
"...and to reach further back, anyone should look into the accident rates of those newly minted WW2 pilots."
Double-digit hour counts, and off to the front. The wipe out rate in training was astronomical. Even though much of the training was in places like Florida and Kansas, where nothing stuck up to get in the way. The planes were made to last +/- 20 missions, because that was the average airframe lifespan. Use the parts from some to fix up the shot-up aircraft who made it back.
What amazes me is the number of airports named after some green volunteer who pranged fatally during training. Ohare is the exception, not the rule.
"...and to reach further back, anyone should look into the accident rates of those newly minted WW2 pilots."
Double-digit hour counts, and off to the front. The wipe out rate in training was astronomical. Even though much of the training was in places like Florida and Kansas, where nothing stuck up to get in the way. The planes were made to last +/- 20 missions, because that was the average airframe lifespan. Use the parts from some to fix up the shot-up aircraft who made it back.
What amazes me is the number of airports named after some green volunteer who pranged fatally during training. Ohare is the exception, not the rule.
#5750
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,606
But that is not what CBreezy and FB want to hear. They only want preposterous vitriol to support their theory that MAG pilots are of a lesser caliber than all other regional pilots, even if facts indicate otherwise. They don't know what it's really like here though because neither one of them actually works here. Instead they have this fantasy world on APC where they contribute absolutely nothing of value and mainly post just to annoy everyone. Most people just ignore them. They have one of these circle jerks about once every week or two. Typical regional lifer attitude, because no one at mainline wants to work with those types (At least that's what I'm told when riding the jumpseat).
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post