Mesa
#2371
Quote:
Originally Posted by prior121
So you went from CRJ CA to EJET CA? You must be part of the initial cadre as any other way would be a violation of the CBA.
And yes, we are talking about two different points. I'm talking about senior FOs and the ability to hold CRJ vs EJET.
And no, I'm not new, I've been here since hiring started last year, RAH /E175 refugee.
In that case, "welcome to
Mesa newbe"
Originally Posted by prior121
So you went from CRJ CA to EJET CA? You must be part of the initial cadre as any other way would be a violation of the CBA.
And yes, we are talking about two different points. I'm talking about senior FOs and the ability to hold CRJ vs EJET.
And no, I'm not new, I've been here since hiring started last year, RAH /E175 refugee.
In that case, "welcome to
Mesa newbe"
Haha. Oh boy. Then 35% + of the seniority list is newbies
#2374
Lol that's kinda what I was thinking???
Here's a temporary breakdown of where we'll eventually be:
IAD – 20 CRJ700s
IAH – 30 E175s
DFW – 29 CRJ900s
PHX – 17 CRJ900s
LAX – 9 CRJ900s
CLT drawdown starts towards the end of the year when
that flying begins to move to DFW.
Here's a temporary breakdown of where we'll eventually be:
IAD – 20 CRJ700s
IAH – 30 E175s
DFW – 29 CRJ900s
PHX – 17 CRJ900s
LAX – 9 CRJ900s
CLT drawdown starts towards the end of the year when
that flying begins to move to DFW.
#2375
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Position: men without hats
Posts: 374
Lol that's kinda what I was thinking???
#2376
Ok got it now. Definitely see what you meant now. Honestly, you never know though? It might comeback with Ejets but seems like thats gonna be Skywests playground for now.
#2377
Ah, I figured that was a hypothetical second Ejet contract.
But those LAX CRJ's are all Phoenix-based for now, right? I thought PHX was bigger than that, but the numbers make sense.
But those LAX CRJ's are all Phoenix-based for now, right? I thought PHX was bigger than that, but the numbers make sense.
#2378
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: CRJ CA
Posts: 180
So you went from CRJ CA to EJET CA? You must be part of the initial cadre as any other way would be a violation of the CBA.
And yes, we are talking about two different points. I'm talking about senior FOs and the ability to hold CRJ vs EJET.
And no, I'm not new, I've been here since hiring started last year, RAH /E175 refugee.
And yes, we are talking about two different points. I'm talking about senior FOs and the ability to hold CRJ vs EJET.
And no, I'm not new, I've been here since hiring started last year, RAH /E175 refugee.
You just weren't here when all the downgrading/furloughing went on, Prior, you wouldn't have known that.
#2380
No future growth accounted for in those numbers. Those are planes and bases that have been listed and announced thus far.
No word on projected but still a lot of options on the horizon I'm hearing.
No word on projected but still a lot of options on the horizon I'm hearing.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post