Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Mesa Airlines
Mesa Air Group Chapter 11 Info >

Mesa Air Group Chapter 11 Info

Search

Notices
Mesa Airlines Regional Airline

Mesa Air Group Chapter 11 Info

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-24-2010, 08:14 AM
  #901  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
winglet's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 467
Default

Originally Posted by minimwage4
It could also turn out that the Mesa alpa doesn't agree to the concessions, but very unlikely.
minimwage4,

MAG has already approached MAG ALPA for concessions to gain renewal of the USAirways contract. MAG ALPA refused to discuss concessions.

winglet
winglet is offline  
Old 05-24-2010, 08:20 AM
  #902  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
winglet's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 467
Default

Originally Posted by hslightnin
On Thursday, MAG senior management asked the MEC to consider opening concessionary contract talks. US Airways is looking to reduce costs immediately, and in return, MAG would be given an extension to the codeshare agreement that would otherwise end in 2012. MAG management is seeking concessions from aircraft lessors, vendors, labor, and other interested stakeholders in an effort to secure the contract extension.
The MEC was not surprised by management’s request. US Airways has put an RFP out for bid, and apparently, other management teams have approached their pilot groups for concessions in an attempt to gain this business. To our knowledge, all the other groups have rejected such concessions.
After discussing the issue last night, the MEC today informed the company that we were not interested in engaging in concessionary discussions.
Labor is not the problem at MAG; we have a competitive contract. This fact has been reiterated by MAG management. In filing bankruptcy, the company was clear that it needed to eliminate excess aircraft


thats from 2 weeks ago, i hope they still feel the same
hslightnin,

You beat me to it... I predict that the new MEC Chair and the new Negotiating Committee members will put up a good fight. Hopefully, the remaining MAG pilots won't be so easily fooled by the old carrot-and-stick routine either.

winglet

Last edited by winglet; 05-24-2010 at 09:10 AM.
winglet is offline  
Old 05-24-2010, 08:46 AM
  #903  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Posts: 1,114
Default

This is what we all have been saying. For a contract feeder to get this flying it WILL be at a loss!!! It simply will be like the Xjet UAL flying but instead flying 70 plus seat aircraft...

Awac will not take cuts. Mesas MEC states the same... RAH has enough issues with Frontier/Midwest I doubt Airways is considering them... So who knows what will happen. Also its very unlikely another contract operator comes into play that does not currently fly... Keeping in mind it will be done at a loss... What business model will last by doing contract flying for a loss???
meyers9163 is offline  
Old 05-24-2010, 09:35 AM
  #904  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: EMB 145 FO
Posts: 425
Default

Originally Posted by meyers9163
This is what we all have been saying. For a contract feeder to get this flying it WILL be at a loss!!! It simply will be like the Xjet UAL flying but instead flying 70 plus seat aircraft...

Awac will not take cuts. Mesas MEC states the same... RAH has enough issues with Frontier/Midwest I doubt Airways is considering them... So who knows what will happen. Also its very unlikely another contract operator comes into play that does not currently fly... Keeping in mind it will be done at a loss... What business model will last by doing contract flying for a loss???

The XJET flying has a profit margin. You are incorrect, now it may have been a loss for your carrier.
mking84 is offline  
Old 05-24-2010, 09:41 AM
  #905  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
winglet's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 467
Default Watercolor of Two Regional Jet Pilots



Fighting Dung Beetles
Kheper sp.
Watercolor
©2007 Melisa Beveridge

Last edited by winglet; 05-24-2010 at 10:01 AM.
winglet is offline  
Old 05-24-2010, 10:12 AM
  #906  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 133
Default

Meyers may be referring to the concept of the cost of Contract Carriers as opposed to Wholly Owned Subsidiaries. We assume a CC would have to do it at a loss if they underbid Mesa and it looks like Mesa may be doing it at a loss if they don't get concessions on every front.

LCC could pawn it off on either one of their wholly owned airlines (Redheaded Step Children we call ourselves) and at least break even. PSA and PDT are some seriously cheap to to run bottom feeders. Not much better than Mesa, TSA, etc.. Not having the contract requirements and costs, these wholly owned airlines could actually turn a profit where contract carriers may not only based on structure.

Supposedly PSA and Mesa take turns being the lowest cost express provider for Airways and AWAC being the highest.

We suck, Mesa sucks, Republic/Chatauqua sucks, TSA/Gojets sucks, pretty much all regional airlines suck if you ask me. Before anyone starts getting creative on how to underbid the other company or take ANY concessions to keep the flying they already have.. please remember what someone posted before:

The industry trend of contracting the lowest bidder is a business model doomed to ultimate failure. The "race-to-the-bottom" we all hear so much about is totally in the hands of industry "leaders", not the grovelling employees.
Fugazi is offline  
Old 05-24-2010, 10:35 AM
  #907  
2 days off
 
minimwage4's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: Embraer Systems Analyst
Posts: 1,853
Default

Originally Posted by hslightnin


thats from 2 weeks ago, i hope they still feel the same
Yes. That is the key sentence of your post. They can't seem too eager.
minimwage4 is offline  
Old 05-24-2010, 10:39 AM
  #908  
2 days off
 
minimwage4's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: Embraer Systems Analyst
Posts: 1,853
Default

Originally Posted by winglet
hslightnin,

You beat me to it... I predict that the new MEC Chair and the new Negotiating Committee members will put up a good fight. Hopefully, the remaining MAG pilots won't be so easily fooled by the old carrot-and-stick routine either.

winglet
Ok but JO has stated that you will not get the flying if you don't give in. This could very well be a management tactic by making it seem like this is Airways request when the current labor costs are very competitive already. However, I don't think the current pilot group will take a chance. It's all up to usairways.
minimwage4 is offline  
Old 05-24-2010, 10:43 AM
  #909  
2 days off
 
minimwage4's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: Embraer Systems Analyst
Posts: 1,853
Default

Originally Posted by mking84
The XJET flying has a profit margin. You are incorrect, now it may have been a loss for your carrier.
They did loan them about 80 million for the flying. Pay to fly.
minimwage4 is offline  
Old 05-24-2010, 11:05 AM
  #910  
Line Holder
 
BarbieTrash's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: Barbie Jet
Posts: 77
Default

I think it's glaringly obvious that this Phantom regional who is willing to operate at a reduced cost is..... Wait for it...........SKW! Bank of SkyWest would love to have a legal monopoly on all regional flying west of the rockies...They would do the same thing they did with United...loan LCC $90M at 10% interest and then operate at a reduced rate and the interest would make up the difference!...MAG has no money to loan so they have to sweeten the pot with lower costs, MAG was the launch customer for the CRJ 900 so they are probably paying the highest lease rate in the industry right now...MAG can't renegotiate the lower leases with Bombardier because they have already screwed them over to the tune of about 40-50 Airplanes! Another option is they could just Buy MAG lump them in with ASA...oops "Atlantic Southeast Airlines"...because no one wants to pollute that precious pool of non-union holy water...PHX goes to SKW ORD CLT and IAD go to "Atlantic Southeast Airlines" go! would finally die, and everything is happy in Candyland!

Last edited by BarbieTrash; 05-24-2010 at 11:22 AM.
BarbieTrash is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
winglet
Regional
47
05-15-2016 09:45 PM
Past V1
Mesa Airlines
1
01-06-2010 09:09 AM
AirbornPegasus
Regional
14
04-08-2009 07:17 PM
vagabond
Major
33
02-26-2009 05:44 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices