Mesa Air Group Chapter 11 Info
#901
#902
On Thursday, MAG senior management asked the MEC to consider opening concessionary contract talks. US Airways is looking to reduce costs immediately, and in return, MAG would be given an extension to the codeshare agreement that would otherwise end in 2012. MAG management is seeking concessions from aircraft lessors, vendors, labor, and other interested stakeholders in an effort to secure the contract extension.
The MEC was not surprised by management’s request. US Airways has put an RFP out for bid, and apparently, other management teams have approached their pilot groups for concessions in an attempt to gain this business. To our knowledge, all the other groups have rejected such concessions.
After discussing the issue last night, the MEC today informed the company that we were not interested in engaging in concessionary discussions.
Labor is not the problem at MAG; we have a competitive contract. This fact has been reiterated by MAG management. In filing bankruptcy, the company was clear that it needed to eliminate excess aircraft
thats from 2 weeks ago, i hope they still feel the same
The MEC was not surprised by management’s request. US Airways has put an RFP out for bid, and apparently, other management teams have approached their pilot groups for concessions in an attempt to gain this business. To our knowledge, all the other groups have rejected such concessions.
After discussing the issue last night, the MEC today informed the company that we were not interested in engaging in concessionary discussions.
Labor is not the problem at MAG; we have a competitive contract. This fact has been reiterated by MAG management. In filing bankruptcy, the company was clear that it needed to eliminate excess aircraft
thats from 2 weeks ago, i hope they still feel the same
You beat me to it... I predict that the new MEC Chair and the new Negotiating Committee members will put up a good fight. Hopefully, the remaining MAG pilots won't be so easily fooled by the old carrot-and-stick routine either.
winglet
Last edited by winglet; 05-24-2010 at 09:10 AM.
#903
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2008
Posts: 1,114
This is what we all have been saying. For a contract feeder to get this flying it WILL be at a loss!!! It simply will be like the Xjet UAL flying but instead flying 70 plus seat aircraft...
Awac will not take cuts. Mesas MEC states the same... RAH has enough issues with Frontier/Midwest I doubt Airways is considering them... So who knows what will happen. Also its very unlikely another contract operator comes into play that does not currently fly... Keeping in mind it will be done at a loss... What business model will last by doing contract flying for a loss???
Awac will not take cuts. Mesas MEC states the same... RAH has enough issues with Frontier/Midwest I doubt Airways is considering them... So who knows what will happen. Also its very unlikely another contract operator comes into play that does not currently fly... Keeping in mind it will be done at a loss... What business model will last by doing contract flying for a loss???
#904
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: EMB 145 FO
Posts: 425
This is what we all have been saying. For a contract feeder to get this flying it WILL be at a loss!!! It simply will be like the Xjet UAL flying but instead flying 70 plus seat aircraft...
Awac will not take cuts. Mesas MEC states the same... RAH has enough issues with Frontier/Midwest I doubt Airways is considering them... So who knows what will happen. Also its very unlikely another contract operator comes into play that does not currently fly... Keeping in mind it will be done at a loss... What business model will last by doing contract flying for a loss???
Awac will not take cuts. Mesas MEC states the same... RAH has enough issues with Frontier/Midwest I doubt Airways is considering them... So who knows what will happen. Also its very unlikely another contract operator comes into play that does not currently fly... Keeping in mind it will be done at a loss... What business model will last by doing contract flying for a loss???
The XJET flying has a profit margin. You are incorrect, now it may have been a loss for your carrier.
#906
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 133
Meyers may be referring to the concept of the cost of Contract Carriers as opposed to Wholly Owned Subsidiaries. We assume a CC would have to do it at a loss if they underbid Mesa and it looks like Mesa may be doing it at a loss if they don't get concessions on every front.
LCC could pawn it off on either one of their wholly owned airlines (Redheaded Step Children we call ourselves) and at least break even. PSA and PDT are some seriously cheap to to run bottom feeders. Not much better than Mesa, TSA, etc.. Not having the contract requirements and costs, these wholly owned airlines could actually turn a profit where contract carriers may not only based on structure.
Supposedly PSA and Mesa take turns being the lowest cost express provider for Airways and AWAC being the highest.
We suck, Mesa sucks, Republic/Chatauqua sucks, TSA/Gojets sucks, pretty much all regional airlines suck if you ask me. Before anyone starts getting creative on how to underbid the other company or take ANY concessions to keep the flying they already have.. please remember what someone posted before:
The industry trend of contracting the lowest bidder is a business model doomed to ultimate failure. The "race-to-the-bottom" we all hear so much about is totally in the hands of industry "leaders", not the grovelling employees.
LCC could pawn it off on either one of their wholly owned airlines (Redheaded Step Children we call ourselves) and at least break even. PSA and PDT are some seriously cheap to to run bottom feeders. Not much better than Mesa, TSA, etc.. Not having the contract requirements and costs, these wholly owned airlines could actually turn a profit where contract carriers may not only based on structure.
Supposedly PSA and Mesa take turns being the lowest cost express provider for Airways and AWAC being the highest.
We suck, Mesa sucks, Republic/Chatauqua sucks, TSA/Gojets sucks, pretty much all regional airlines suck if you ask me. Before anyone starts getting creative on how to underbid the other company or take ANY concessions to keep the flying they already have.. please remember what someone posted before:
The industry trend of contracting the lowest bidder is a business model doomed to ultimate failure. The "race-to-the-bottom" we all hear so much about is totally in the hands of industry "leaders", not the grovelling employees.
#908
Ok but JO has stated that you will not get the flying if you don't give in. This could very well be a management tactic by making it seem like this is Airways request when the current labor costs are very competitive already. However, I don't think the current pilot group will take a chance. It's all up to usairways.
#909
#910
I think it's glaringly obvious that this Phantom regional who is willing to operate at a reduced cost is..... Wait for it...........SKW! Bank of SkyWest would love to have a legal monopoly on all regional flying west of the rockies...They would do the same thing they did with United...loan LCC $90M at 10% interest and then operate at a reduced rate and the interest would make up the difference!...MAG has no money to loan so they have to sweeten the pot with lower costs, MAG was the launch customer for the CRJ 900 so they are probably paying the highest lease rate in the industry right now...MAG can't renegotiate the lower leases with Bombardier because they have already screwed them over to the tune of about 40-50 Airplanes! Another option is they could just Buy MAG lump them in with ASA...oops "Atlantic Southeast Airlines"...because no one wants to pollute that precious pool of non-union holy water...PHX goes to SKW ORD CLT and IAD go to "Atlantic Southeast Airlines" go! would finally die, and everything is happy in Candyland!
Last edited by BarbieTrash; 05-24-2010 at 11:22 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post