Mesa Air Group Chapter 11 Info
#861
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 191
Until it happens to you. example: Midwest. Basically your saying that all the midwest guys should be stapled to the bottom of republics list. Or maybe your just talking about Mesa? If thats the case I might slightly agree with you.
#862
Mesa undercut all other pilots, putting our pay/QOL back 20 years. Now they should be offered a job at another airline?
The fee for departure would give pilots seniority at another airline, they would keep their seat but would start off at year 1 pay.
Airlines would get experienced pilots for 1st year pay in the left seat. How is this not lowering the bar?
It screws all the F/O's that have waited patiently for upgrade at the same time making management look great for having a stellar bottom line. If you want to end whipsawing then have an industry wide pay rate/contract. Thus reducing the effect labor has on the bottom line.
#863
Line Holder
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Posts: 56
What about the original A-listers from GoJets? I mean weren't some of them originally TSA? And from what I have been told some have moved up from the regional level to other places - corporate, mainline, etc. I mean you keep throwing out "whipsaw", I cannot think of a more perfect example. What about Republic's bid for the American Connection flying? Doesn't it apply? I mean it's direct competition to a wholly owned in Eagle. It was originally awarded to TSA because they could offer a cheaper product right? How is that not just as bad based on your argument?
#864
I'll go for Fee for Departure as long as everyone signs on to it on the same day. If we really could get every single regional onboard, that would be the best possible outcome for all of our careers. That said, we don't live in utopia and not everyone would sign up so it would just amount to a windfall of seniority to any failing airline that had that agreement with any non-failing airline.
But if everyone was a party to it.... Awesome! End the whipsaws.
But if everyone was a party to it.... Awesome! End the whipsaws.
He loses, you lose, company wins. Any questions?
Also the problem with implementing something like this is that different airlines have different prospects for the future. RAH is going to become a major, and eventually get grandfathered to legacy airline status! Their future's so bright they gotta wear shades...why would they make a deal like this with mesa, which is facing possible Ch.7?
#865
What bid? The flying that CHQ was doing for TWA when AMR purchased them?
Last edited by johnso29; 05-21-2010 at 10:03 AM. Reason: fixed quote
#866
What about the original A-listers from GoJets? I mean weren't some of them originally TSA? And from what I have been told some have moved up from the regional level to other places - corporate, mainline, etc. I mean you keep throwing out "whipsaw", I cannot think of a more perfect example. What about Republic's bid for the American Connection flying? Doesn't it apply? I mean it's direct competition to a wholly owned in Eagle. It was originally awarded to TSA because they could offer a cheaper product right? How is that not just as bad based on your argument?
What TSA managment should have done is use the pilots from TransStates for GOjets. Working under the same seniority list etc... They didn't and that hurt the pilots at Trans States. This has nothing to do with the FFD.
My last statement was that i personally believe that Mesa pilots should not have a position reserved for them at other airlines. They are going out of business and it wouldn't be reasonable to expect a job/position elsewhere. They can come over and apply and start at the bottom like everybody else. Mesa pilots took the gamble to work at the worlds worst airline and I am sorry that they will lose their job but Mesa has done far more harm to this industry than good.
When JO comes to them and asks for concessions it hurts all pilots. And to then expect to work at my company with a seniority number above others is just...unjust.
#867
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 936
Midwest was bought, Mesa is going under. Two different things. Just because someone went to Mesa for the quick upgrade doesn't mean they should go in front of someone who has been an FO at a quality airline for 4+ years. I think they should just have to interview at airlines like everyone else instead of getting mixed in because they worked for a crappy airline just for the quick upgrade.
#868
Unfortunately we have a seniority based system in the airlines and for better or for worse it's what we all signed up for. I do feel sorry for the old Mesa guys who will have to start at year 1 pay wherever they go. Its easy for us all to chastise these pilots for their decisions, and most of it is well deserved. However, at the end of the day they are just people like you and me with houses, wife/husband, kids, and obligations. Nobody wants to go through what they're about to and so we have to extend a bit of sympathy there.
So what to do? We can't reasonably expect to be able to jump to another airline and retain seniority. That's just not fair to the rest of the folks at the new airline. I think our focus going forward is to even out the pay scale at all airlines. The hazing process of ridiculously low 1st year pay followed by ridiculously low FO pay is just giving airlines an excuse to keep the work group fresh. Think of the advantage a major airline can have if they just hand contracts to new airlines every couple of years and make us all start back at the bottom over and over.
If we flatten the pay rates so instead of starting at $19k and end at $120k we can shoot for $30k to $90k? $40k to $70k? That would still give the senior guys a pretty nice paycheck but avoid having pilots starving down at the bottom of the list just wanting the quick upgrade. I doubt Mesa would have gotten all those eager pilots if they didn't promise them that they would be in and out to a major in 3-5 years if they would just take slave wages.
So what to do? We can't reasonably expect to be able to jump to another airline and retain seniority. That's just not fair to the rest of the folks at the new airline. I think our focus going forward is to even out the pay scale at all airlines. The hazing process of ridiculously low 1st year pay followed by ridiculously low FO pay is just giving airlines an excuse to keep the work group fresh. Think of the advantage a major airline can have if they just hand contracts to new airlines every couple of years and make us all start back at the bottom over and over.
If we flatten the pay rates so instead of starting at $19k and end at $120k we can shoot for $30k to $90k? $40k to $70k? That would still give the senior guys a pretty nice paycheck but avoid having pilots starving down at the bottom of the list just wanting the quick upgrade. I doubt Mesa would have gotten all those eager pilots if they didn't promise them that they would be in and out to a major in 3-5 years if they would just take slave wages.
#869
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 888
If we flatten the pay rates so instead of starting at $19k and end at $120k we can shoot for $30k to $90k? $40k to $70k? That would still give the senior guys a pretty nice paycheck but avoid having pilots starving down at the bottom of the list just wanting the quick upgrade. I doubt Mesa would have gotten all those eager pilots if they didn't promise them that they would be in and out to a major in 3-5 years if they would just take slave wages.
I've said it once and I'll say it again, pilots are screwed because there's too many guys out for themselves. If we weren't union and seniority based then being out for yourself is the American way, being union and seniority based, in theory you're looking out for your brothers and the profession. Nice theory.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post