Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Mesa Airlines
Mesa Air Group Chapter 11 Info >

Mesa Air Group Chapter 11 Info

Search

Notices
Mesa Airlines Regional Airline

Mesa Air Group Chapter 11 Info

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-21-2010, 05:37 AM
  #861  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 191
Default

Originally Posted by dashtrash300
Amen! I totally agree. They do not deserve to be mixed into a seniority list just because their airline goes under.
Until it happens to you. example: Midwest. Basically your saying that all the midwest guys should be stapled to the bottom of republics list. Or maybe your just talking about Mesa? If thats the case I might slightly agree with you.
TheBills is offline  
Old 05-21-2010, 06:39 AM
  #862  
Gets Weekends Off
 
seafeye's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Hot tub for now
Posts: 1,203
Default

Originally Posted by TheBills
Until it happens to you. example: Midwest. Basically your saying that all the midwest guys should be stapled to the bottom of republics list. Or maybe your just talking about Mesa? If thats the case I might slightly agree with you.
Are they still flying under the midwest certificate?

Mesa undercut all other pilots, putting our pay/QOL back 20 years. Now they should be offered a job at another airline?

The fee for departure would give pilots seniority at another airline, they would keep their seat but would start off at year 1 pay.

Airlines would get experienced pilots for 1st year pay in the left seat. How is this not lowering the bar?
It screws all the F/O's that have waited patiently for upgrade at the same time making management look great for having a stellar bottom line. If you want to end whipsawing then have an industry wide pay rate/contract. Thus reducing the effect labor has on the bottom line.
seafeye is offline  
Old 05-21-2010, 07:03 AM
  #863  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Posts: 56
Default

Originally Posted by seafeye
Are they still flying under the midwest certificate?

Mesa undercut all other pilots, putting our pay/QOL back 20 years. Now they should be offered a job at another airline?.
What about the original A-listers from GoJets? I mean weren't some of them originally TSA? And from what I have been told some have moved up from the regional level to other places - corporate, mainline, etc. I mean you keep throwing out "whipsaw", I cannot think of a more perfect example. What about Republic's bid for the American Connection flying? Doesn't it apply? I mean it's direct competition to a wholly owned in Eagle. It was originally awarded to TSA because they could offer a cheaper product right? How is that not just as bad based on your argument?
Tar Heel is offline  
Old 05-21-2010, 07:09 AM
  #864  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,041
Default

Originally Posted by Blueskies21
I'll go for Fee for Departure as long as everyone signs on to it on the same day. If we really could get every single regional onboard, that would be the best possible outcome for all of our careers. That said, we don't live in utopia and not everyone would sign up so it would just amount to a windfall of seniority to any failing airline that had that agreement with any non-failing airline.

But if everyone was a party to it.... Awesome! End the whipsaws.
It would be nice on one level, but I doubt it would end whipsaw. The regionals could maybe be convinced by their pilot groups to honor seniority from other airlines, and to hire such people...but there is no way in hell you are going to get them to honor LONGEVITY from another airline! A CA from a failed airline might come in with 20+ years seniority and bid single digits in your domicile, but he is going to be doing it on first year pay!

He loses, you lose, company wins. Any questions?

Also the problem with implementing something like this is that different airlines have different prospects for the future. RAH is going to become a major, and eventually get grandfathered to legacy airline status! Their future's so bright they gotta wear shades...why would they make a deal like this with mesa, which is facing possible Ch.7?
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 05-21-2010, 09:16 AM
  #865  
Che Guevara
 
ToiletDuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Default

Originally Posted by Tar Heel
What about Republic's bid for the American Connection flying? Doesn't it apply? I mean it's direct competition to a wholly owned in Eagle.
What bid? The flying that CHQ was doing for TWA when AMR purchased them?

Last edited by johnso29; 05-21-2010 at 10:03 AM. Reason: fixed quote
ToiletDuck is offline  
Old 05-21-2010, 09:49 AM
  #866  
Gets Weekends Off
 
seafeye's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Hot tub for now
Posts: 1,203
Default

Originally Posted by Tar Heel
What about the original A-listers from GoJets? I mean weren't some of them originally TSA? And from what I have been told some have moved up from the regional level to other places - corporate, mainline, etc. I mean you keep throwing out "whipsaw", I cannot think of a more perfect example. What about Republic's bid for the American Connection flying? Doesn't it apply? I mean it's direct competition to a wholly owned in Eagle. It was originally awarded to TSA because they could offer a cheaper product right? How is that not just as bad based on your argument?
Trans States had to get an additional operating certificate to use larger airplanes because of the agreement with AMR. Even though the airplanes would be operated under United Airlines.
What TSA managment should have done is use the pilots from TransStates for GOjets. Working under the same seniority list etc... They didn't and that hurt the pilots at Trans States. This has nothing to do with the FFD.
My last statement was that i personally believe that Mesa pilots should not have a position reserved for them at other airlines. They are going out of business and it wouldn't be reasonable to expect a job/position elsewhere. They can come over and apply and start at the bottom like everybody else. Mesa pilots took the gamble to work at the worlds worst airline and I am sorry that they will lose their job but Mesa has done far more harm to this industry than good.
When JO comes to them and asks for concessions it hurts all pilots. And to then expect to work at my company with a seniority number above others is just...unjust.
seafeye is offline  
Old 05-21-2010, 10:04 AM
  #867  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 936
Default

Originally Posted by TheBills
Until it happens to you. example: Midwest. Basically your saying that all the midwest guys should be stapled to the bottom of republics list. Or maybe your just talking about Mesa? If thats the case I might slightly agree with you.
Midwest was bought, Mesa is going under. Two different things. Just because someone went to Mesa for the quick upgrade doesn't mean they should go in front of someone who has been an FO at a quality airline for 4+ years. I think they should just have to interview at airlines like everyone else instead of getting mixed in because they worked for a crappy airline just for the quick upgrade.
dashtrash300 is offline  
Old 05-21-2010, 10:10 AM
  #868  
Gets Weekends Off
 
iPilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Posts: 638
Default

Unfortunately we have a seniority based system in the airlines and for better or for worse it's what we all signed up for. I do feel sorry for the old Mesa guys who will have to start at year 1 pay wherever they go. Its easy for us all to chastise these pilots for their decisions, and most of it is well deserved. However, at the end of the day they are just people like you and me with houses, wife/husband, kids, and obligations. Nobody wants to go through what they're about to and so we have to extend a bit of sympathy there.

So what to do? We can't reasonably expect to be able to jump to another airline and retain seniority. That's just not fair to the rest of the folks at the new airline. I think our focus going forward is to even out the pay scale at all airlines. The hazing process of ridiculously low 1st year pay followed by ridiculously low FO pay is just giving airlines an excuse to keep the work group fresh. Think of the advantage a major airline can have if they just hand contracts to new airlines every couple of years and make us all start back at the bottom over and over.

If we flatten the pay rates so instead of starting at $19k and end at $120k we can shoot for $30k to $90k? $40k to $70k? That would still give the senior guys a pretty nice paycheck but avoid having pilots starving down at the bottom of the list just wanting the quick upgrade. I doubt Mesa would have gotten all those eager pilots if they didn't promise them that they would be in and out to a major in 3-5 years if they would just take slave wages.
iPilot is offline  
Old 05-21-2010, 10:31 AM
  #869  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 888
Default

Originally Posted by iPilot
If we flatten the pay rates so instead of starting at $19k and end at $120k we can shoot for $30k to $90k? $40k to $70k? That would still give the senior guys a pretty nice paycheck but avoid having pilots starving down at the bottom of the list just wanting the quick upgrade. I doubt Mesa would have gotten all those eager pilots if they didn't promise them that they would be in and out to a major in 3-5 years if they would just take slave wages.
Mesaba's union had an idea recently to use a 4% snapback raise that captains were getting in December to give the Fo's a 8% raise on the basis that the captain wages were more in line with industry average than fo rates.... put it out for a vote... got just over 50% of the pilot group to vote... 68% of the captains participating voted no and 91% of the FO's voted yes. You won't find any support on the high side to flatten out the wages, guys don't care that anyone is starving because they're not.

I've said it once and I'll say it again, pilots are screwed because there's too many guys out for themselves. If we weren't union and seniority based then being out for yourself is the American way, being union and seniority based, in theory you're looking out for your brothers and the profession. Nice theory.
Blueskies21 is offline  
Old 05-21-2010, 10:38 AM
  #870  
Gets Weekends Off
 
iPilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Posts: 638
Default

Yeah but CBAs are agreed upon by the entire pilot group. Everyone gets one vote so even if the senior guys don't like it, if the majority votes YES it should go through.
iPilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
winglet
Regional
47
05-15-2016 09:45 PM
Past V1
Mesa Airlines
1
01-06-2010 09:09 AM
AirbornPegasus
Regional
14
04-08-2009 07:17 PM
vagabond
Major
33
02-26-2009 05:44 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices