Search

Notices
Mesa Airlines Regional Airline

Bankruptcy Rumors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-19-2022, 06:03 AM
  #191  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,803
Default

Sarcasm people. SARCASM! Geeeeez.
WHACKMASTER is offline  
Old 12-19-2022, 06:08 AM
  #192  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 51
Default

Regional carrier Mesa Air exploring options to raise capital after United switch


Reuters
8:24 AM ET Dec-19-2022Dec 19 (Reuters) - Mesa Air Group Inc (MESA.NaE) said on Monday it was exploring options to raise money amid rising costs after the U.S. regional carrier handed its pilots bumper contracts to deter switching to other airlines.

Shares of Mesa (MESA.NaE), which said it was finalizing an agreement to operate regional flights for United Airlines, were up about 7% before the bell.

Regional carriers run flights to places that do not attract routes from the bigger U.S. airlines. For instance, American Eagle is a network of six regional carriers operating 3,400 daily flights under a codeshare with American Airlines (AAL.NaE).

Mesa (MESA.NaE) said it was moving to United's network from next year after opting to wind down flights for American Airlines (AAL.NaE).

The company added it was finalizing a previously announced sale of remaining eight CRJ-550 jets to United, adding it also has an agreement to sell 11 surplus CRJ-900 aircraft to an unnamed third party.

"Mesa (MESA.NaE) is pursuing other avenues to increase liquidity through the sale of additional surplus aircraft, spare parts and spare engines," said Arizona-based Mesa (MESA.NaE) in a statement.

Reducing debt has become a priority for the airline industry that went on a borrowing binge to survive the pandemic. The industry is also facing cost pressures from fuel prices and new labor contracts.

Mesa (MESA.NaE) had raised pilot salaries earlier this year by as much as 172%.

The carrier, which recently postponed the release of its fourth-quarter results scheduled for Dec. 12, had total assets of $1.32 billion as of June 30 versus total liabilities of $897.1 million. (Reporting by Kannaki Deka in Bengaluru; Editing by Krishna Chandra Eluri)
FA24 is offline  
Old 12-19-2022, 06:10 AM
  #193  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pangolin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Default

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
yiu are dense aren’t you. They would need to go to 70. The 175s Mesa already CANT FLY are the 70 seat version. The E170s that RAH have, the only path this pipe dream has of working, are 70 70 seats.

Do you really think United is going to park 40 NEW! E175 with 76 seats for Mesas 20 year dumpster fire 900s?

UNITED IS MAXED OUT FOR SCOPE!

there is a hard number of 76 seaters that will never grow! There is a hard number of 70 seaters that will never grow! WE ARE AT BOTH LIMITS!
We are not flying all the 76 seat 175s we have. Republic is not flying all of theirs either.
pangolin is offline  
Old 12-19-2022, 06:15 AM
  #194  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: 787
Posts: 3,202
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin;[url=tel:3555180
3555180]We are not flying all the 76 seat 175s we have. Republic is not flying all of theirs either.
but they are under the CPA and that is what matters. Not whether or not the parking brake is set.

you have to remove the E175s from the CPA
MasterOfPuppets is offline  
Old 12-19-2022, 06:18 AM
  #195  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pangolin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Default

Originally Posted by Hedley
That seems pretty impractical as a short term solution. There would have to be changes made in the reservation/ticketing software, paint aircraft, open a 900 crew base in UA hubs or deadhead crews around, etc. Wouldn't it be better to run displacement bids as the AA flying winds down, focus on captains, and staff the aircraft that UA actually wants? The E175 is a far superior product to the CRJ from a customer standpoint. Introducing an undesirable fleet type on a temporary basis just doesn’t make sense. My guess is that Mesa is told to do what they need to do to staff their allocated 175’s, or UA will shop for another vendor.
900s are already in the UA reservation system - non issue. What matters is the number of 900s. We only have staffing for 25. There’s at least that many 175s not flying. Crj to 175 swaps have happened in the past so it’s not out of the question as a stop gap while we train. That’s what I expect. Instant spring summer lift for UA to replace the loss of AW as we spin up. We need FOs on the 175 more than ca. However I’m skeptical still as well because no 900 flying is reflected in any UA future schedule especially out of DFW and PHX.
pangolin is offline  
Old 12-19-2022, 06:23 AM
  #196  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2022
Posts: 492
Default

Originally Posted by Hedley
paint aircraft
They won’t paint the aircraft. They would peel the American Eagle off and fly a grey plane around with a United logo. Mesa has been doing that for a few years with their AA Eagle birds anyway
bonvoyage is offline  
Old 12-19-2022, 06:36 AM
  #197  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: 787
Posts: 3,202
Default

Originally Posted by bonvoyage
They won’t paint the aircraft. They would peel the American Eagle off and fly a grey plane around with a United logo. Mesa has been doing that for a few years with their AA Eagle birds anyway
there was a point in time in United’s past where I could see that happening. Kirby would not do that to the United brand.
MasterOfPuppets is offline  
Old 12-19-2022, 06:37 AM
  #198  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,327
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin
900s are already in the UA reservation system - non issue. What matters is the number of 900s. We only have staffing for 25. There’s at least that many 175s not flying. Crj to 175 swaps have happened in the past so it’s not out of the question as a stop gap while we train. That’s what I expect. Instant spring summer lift for UA to replace the loss of AW as we spin up. We need FOs on the 175 more than ca. However I’m skeptical still as well because no 900 flying is reflected in any UA future schedule especially out of DFW and PHX.
As mentioned before, isn’t how may planes have the parking brake set, it’s how many are under contract (staffed or not). Simply having 175’s sitting on a ramp won’t cut it, they have to be removed from the agreement between United and Mesa. Also, -900 flying out of DFW or PHX is AA flying. If UA did as you mention, the flying would be out of UA hubs to smaller cities. Kirby has been pretty clear that sending rj’s into the hubs of our competitors is a failing strategy. Mesa could pull a rabbit out of the hat like Air Wisconsin did and find flying with another carrier, but I seriously doubt that you’ll see CRJ-900’s in the UAX system.
Hedley is offline  
Old 12-19-2022, 06:45 AM
  #199  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 429
Default

The real problem won't be scope at United or any of these other issues.

The real problem will be the continued staffing problems at Mesa. Why would anyone want to fly for Mesa when the writing is on the wall that they are not a sustainable company. Mesa offers much lower compensation and worsening QOL, combined with the very real possibility of going out of business at any moment. Anyone that works at Mesa will be looking to leave as quickly as possible and no one will be coming in the door. This will lead to a negative feedback cycle with worsening conditions.
DoNoHarm is offline  
Old 12-19-2022, 06:46 AM
  #200  
Isn’t that a sauce?
 
Joined APC: May 2022
Posts: 280
Default

Originally Posted by Hedley
As mentioned before, isn’t how may planes have the parking brake set, it’s how many are under contract (staffed or not). Simply having 175’s sitting on a ramp won’t cut it, they have to be removed from the agreement between United and Mesa. Also, -900 flying out of DFW or PHX is AA flying. If UA did as you mention, the flying would be out of UA hubs to smaller cities. Kirby has been pretty clear that sending rj’s into the hubs of our competitors is a failing strategy. Mesa could pull a rabbit out of the hat like Air Wisconsin did and find flying with another carrier, but I seriously doubt that you’ll see CRJ-900’s in the UAX system.
A rabbit out of a hat? There’s only two other carriers left. Delta and Alaska. Delta won’t go near Mesa. Been there done that. As for Alaska they’re shrinking Horizon and already use SkyWest. Mesa is sunk.
Twr199 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tuktukdriver
Major
42
11-16-2013 08:29 AM
Elvis90
American
49
09-29-2011 10:24 AM
vagabond
Aviation Law
2
09-22-2008 11:56 AM
JollyF15
Major
5
04-20-2007 10:42 AM
RockBottom
Major
2
08-20-2006 08:30 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices