Search

Notices
Mesa Airlines Regional Airline

Bankruptcy Rumors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-18-2022, 03:40 PM
  #161  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2017
Posts: 81
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin
PHX works - there can be out stations that operate line crew bases. Mesa does this with SDF presently. It increased productivity. DFW and PHX work for the same reason - these bases will be SMALL. There's talk of a DEN base as well as an IAH CRJ base. I think PHX and DFW will shrink. I don't expect to hold DFW any longer. Oh well things change. But bringing the 900's temporarily (the 76 seaters) will not violate scope at UA so long as eqyivalant 76 seaters are parked. No reason for the UAL MEC to object. We will train the CRJ pilots on the ERJ and just re-add the ERJ As we remove CRJs. This is a win for UA because they get increased flying immediately Mesa gets nearly full utilization of their pilots as they cross train to the ERJ. Win/Win - with very little negative downside. We can staff about 25 CRJ's and are currently flying under 30 for AA. 11 of these planes are fairly new low MX birds. Even if we only bring on 10 CRJ 900s - we can fly parked 700;s and 550s that GoJet cannot staff. This really isn't unrealistic.

Some things that are unrealistic.

Keeping the bases the same sizes.
Keeping the 900s for very long.
So they’re going to repaint those 900s so they can fly for UA for ~6 months while the CRJ pilots transition to the 175 and then start phasing them out? Right…
Sasquatched is offline  
Old 12-18-2022, 04:18 PM
  #162  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pangolin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Default

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
SDF is not DFW and PHX. United can’t compete with a CRJ against A321s flown by AA and 737s flown by Southwest. Hell it can’t even compete against F9 and NK with that product.

less than 10 first class seats into major metro areas?

flying RJs into other airlines hubs is why United has sucked for the last 20 years. You want to
lose your premium passengers? Put a crap airline that can’t staff and a crap airplane that’s poorly maintained on a major route. Face it DFW and PHX are gone.
Our next gens are 12 first class seats. Same as the ejet. We fly the ejet a lot into Sdf.
pangolin is offline  
Old 12-18-2022, 04:24 PM
  #163  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LizzyBorden's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2022
Position: Clappin' Rip Bombs
Posts: 421
Default

UA pilots and ALPA are in the drivers seat, and anyone who would question what the UA pilots on here are saying, maybe should rethink. The crapstorm that would happen if UA management tried to backdoor something would be astronomical.
LizzyBorden is offline  
Old 12-18-2022, 04:45 PM
  #164  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LizzyBorden's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2022
Position: Clappin' Rip Bombs
Posts: 421
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin
This is what anyone with a brain expects to happen. I don't expect to stay on the 900 - I expect to go to the 175. A DFW base (small) is still possible as we already fly numerous flights per day - just start and end in DFW. It won't be the same SIZE as the current base, but it can be a base. Nobody says the bases will be the same size.
Honest question...do you really believe any of this?
LizzyBorden is offline  
Old 12-18-2022, 04:56 PM
  #165  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 429
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin
This is what anyone with a brain expects to happen. I don't expect to stay on the 900 - I expect to go to the 175. A DFW base (small) is still possible as we already fly numerous flights per day - just start and end in DFW. It won't be the same SIZE as the current base, but it can be a base. Nobody says the bases will be the same size.
Mesa is done. Zero percent chance that they will exist a year from now.

There will be all kinds of rumors and stories passed around to try to keep pilots on property for the last few months of their operations, but they will not be true. There will be more airlines that fold in the next 12-18 months, so it won't just be Mesa, but Mesa will certainly be the next one to go out of business.

Get out as soon as you can.
DoNoHarm is offline  
Old 12-18-2022, 05:04 PM
  #166  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2021
Posts: 378
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin
Our next gens are 12 first class seats. Same as the ejet. We fly the ejet a lot into Sdf.
I think the newer 900s are AA owned. There sticker price new is 40 million each. It’s likely airlines pay half that, but no way Mesa is sitting on a canceled contract with 10 20 million dollar 900s and a market cap of 43 million.
OpieTaylor is offline  
Old 12-18-2022, 05:12 PM
  #167  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pangolin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Default

Originally Posted by OpieTaylor
I think the newer 900s are AA owned. There sticker price new is 40 million each. It’s likely airlines pay half that, but no way Mesa is sitting on a canceled contract with 10 20 million dollar 900s and a market cap of 43 million.
No Mesa crjs are owned by American.
pangolin is offline  
Old 12-18-2022, 05:14 PM
  #168  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pangolin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Default

Originally Posted by DoNoHarm
Mesa is done. Zero percent chance that they will exist a year from now.

There will be all kinds of rumors and stories passed around to try to keep pilots on property for the last few months of their operations, but they will not be true. There will be more airlines that fold in the next 12-18 months, so it won't just be Mesa, but Mesa will certainly be the next one to go out of business.

Get out as soon as you can.
Even if the 900s are not flown for United Mesa will be just fine. Crj training has not halted. Ask yourself why.
pangolin is offline  
Old 12-18-2022, 05:23 PM
  #169  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2021
Posts: 378
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin
Even if the 900s are not flown for United Mesa will be just fine. Crj training has not halted. Ask yourself why.
It’s likely accounting, I doubt Mesa has the 900s paid off as an asset on their books. If they can’t sell them for whats leveraged against them then they have to keep them in a service contract. I have no idea what will happen, I am sure United doesn't like having idle assets sitting around, but Mesa would likely file BK if they had to pay for leveraged 900s without a CPA on them.

How can Mesa be “just fine” with idle assets that aren’t paid for. The idle E jets are United’s problem the 900s are Mesa’s problem.
OpieTaylor is offline  
Old 12-18-2022, 05:33 PM
  #170  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LizzyBorden's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2022
Position: Clappin' Rip Bombs
Posts: 421
Default

Originally Posted by OpieTaylor
It’s likely accounting, I doubt Mesa has the 900s paid off as an asset on their books. If they can’t sell them for whats leveraged against them then they have to keep them in a service contract. I have no idea what will happen, I am sure United doesn't like having idle assets sitting around, but Mesa would likely file BK if they had to pay for leveraged 900s without a CPA on them.

How can Mesa be “just fine” with idle assets that aren’t paid for. The idle E jets are United’s problem the 900s are Mesa’s problem.
Guaranteed the idle 175's have caused a truckload of heartburn to UA's management. I would bet money that United has told Mesa to figure out a way to staff those airplanes or else. All else aside, that is why the whole illusion of these 900's flying in United colors is absolutely silly.
LizzyBorden is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tuktukdriver
Major
42
11-16-2013 08:29 AM
Elvis90
American
49
09-29-2011 10:24 AM
vagabond
Aviation Law
2
09-22-2008 11:56 AM
JollyF15
Major
5
04-20-2007 10:42 AM
RockBottom
Major
2
08-20-2006 08:30 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices