Why DAL's proposed ratio is inequitable
#211
take my chances.
NWA cash position better than Delta. Nwa cost structure much better than Delta. First Quarter loss at NWA much smaller than Delta.
In 1987 I was told that nwa would not be around in 2 years and that we would be gobbled up by American. This came straight out of the mouth of Crandall. I think he was wrong. We are still here and American is looking at the possiblilty of BK and not doing so well. Funny how things work out. I still remind my American buddies of this today.
Again good luck to us all!!!
#212
I would rather take my chances as a stand alone carrier than do this merger because I think that we will be back at the table giving up pay and other things trying to save this giant company.
NWA cash position better than Delta. Nwa cost structure much better than Delta. First Quarter loss at NWA much smaller than Delta.
In 1987 I was told that nwa would not be around in 2 years and that we would be gobbled up by American. This came straight out of the mouth of Crandall. I think he was wrong. We are still here and American is looking at the possiblilty of BK and not doing so well. Funny how things work out. I still remind my American buddies of this today.
Again good luck to us all!!!
NWA cash position better than Delta. Nwa cost structure much better than Delta. First Quarter loss at NWA much smaller than Delta.
In 1987 I was told that nwa would not be around in 2 years and that we would be gobbled up by American. This came straight out of the mouth of Crandall. I think he was wrong. We are still here and American is looking at the possiblilty of BK and not doing so well. Funny how things work out. I still remind my American buddies of this today.
Again good luck to us all!!!
I'm out of metaphors...
#213
not giddy at all
Pretty good demonstration then of who actually has more widebody flying then isn't it? Who cares what page you are on.. the issue here is how much widebody captain flying would be available to you. Not being snotty, but if the numbers that rvr350 posted are accurate, you should be absolutely giddy about this merger and relative seniority, because what you WILL hold is much better than what you CAN hold now.
Last edited by keenster; 04-29-2008 at 06:35 AM.
#214
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: west coast wannabe
Posts: 815
I think what this merger brings is more than a measly 12 bucks an hour pay raise. If mgmt doesn't screw things too badly, it will bring a much better long term prospect for all of us on board. And believe it or not, it will transfer into better QOL that you so treasure.
#215
Not giddy at all. I can fly 757 capt at 142 an hour over here. Your 757-767 rate is 155. So $12 per hour x 75 hours is $900 bucks after taxes and crap mabe 475 take home. I am really excited about that-- no way!!!!! That will give me quality of life- not hardly! And where is the guarantee that the pay will stay there. Quality of life comes from senority not pay.
#216
Man I hope and pray that you are right but I for one am not sticking my head in the sand. Being aroud this business for 23 years we are just a number to the company and the company will do what the company will do without regards to the needs of a number. I think that this merger will put more people on the streets than we can imagine in time. Right now a pretty picture is being painted so that it will go through. Then that picture will be taken down off the wall and be thrown in the trash. Then the ugly picture will emerge. I hope that I am wrong.
#217
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
It is easy for you to say that thses airplanes will be parked. Who knows but to assume they are going to be parked with no facts is just plain wrong. We have heard nothing about parking any of the 200 747 and if they would be parked they would probably have been repalced with another aircraft-possible 400 conversions as the 787 come onboard. Also the 9s woudl probably be parked in time but there may well have been a replacement for this to, but these 2 companies have been planning this merger for some time.
http://www.streetinsider.com/Press+R...s/3568400.html
I would assume that you would consider these as "facts."
Of course you'd say that's fair. You want all the upside your retirement attrition brings (and at age 60 vice 65), but none of the downside airframe attrition risk you bring. Also, it's the managers that want the merger, not me.
#218
Its called max pay for min time away from home. One 13 day trip and your done then 18 to 30 days off depending on when you bid your next trip.
#219
Of course you'd say that's fair. You want all the upside your retirement attrition brings (and at age 60 vice 65), but none of the downside airframe attrition risk you bring. Also, it's the managers that want the merger, not me.[/quote]
I don't call 1 nwa guy and 1 delta guy not taking any of the down side risk how do you figure that formula takes none of the downside attrition risk. we are bringing that risk because your management made the decision to merger, not us.
I don't call 1 nwa guy and 1 delta guy not taking any of the down side risk how do you figure that formula takes none of the downside attrition risk. we are bringing that risk because your management made the decision to merger, not us.
#220
How would it affect you to put 1500 nwa guys in front of you that were both junior to you date of hire and younger than you? What would that do to your progression up the seniority ladder? and lets see you only have 8 years left to fly because I plan to get out at 60.
Last edited by keenster; 04-29-2008 at 07:10 AM.