DAL/NWA pilots agree?
#21
Banned
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,480
Wouldn't surprise me a bit, Buck. I was a news item that NWA ALPA guys were still debating Republic merger issues from 1986, though those issues were unspecified.
A guess? When it came to merging the lists, the NWA fences would be OBE and the Republic guys would have a shot at NWA wides.
A guess? When it came to merging the lists, the NWA fences would be OBE and the Republic guys would have a shot at NWA wides.
#22
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,049
Fish - Now that's an angle I had not considered.
Thanks!
Look like there is an agreement to disagree. Fine with me
Thanks!
Look like there is an agreement to disagree. Fine with me
Last edited by Bucking Bar; 02-22-2008 at 08:01 PM.
#23
Wouldn't surprise me a bit, Buck. I was a news item that NWA ALPA guys were still debating Republic merger issues from 1986, though those issues were unspecified.
A guess? When it came to merging the lists, the NWA fences would be OBE and the Republic guys would have a shot at NWA wides.
A guess? When it came to merging the lists, the NWA fences would be OBE and the Republic guys would have a shot at NWA wides.
#24
Fact: The Delta pilots had a merger committee running and funded for over a year.
Rumor: The NWA pilots were unprepared and were fighting amongst themselves with hard feelings about mergers from the previous attempts at integrating their own list.
IMHO the NWA pilots will kill this deal and the Delta pilots will be happy about it.
Rumor: The NWA pilots were unprepared and were fighting amongst themselves with hard feelings about mergers from the previous attempts at integrating their own list.
IMHO the NWA pilots will kill this deal and the Delta pilots will be happy about it.
Where do you get this stuff? Our seniority list is DOH. The previous merger you are talking about happened in 1986. Hard feelings from then? Maybe still a few. But believe me, not like you are painting it. Our message boards talk of the old COBRA Airlines rising again. We are united and prepared.
"Hissss...."
New K Now
#25
Last edited by greenmoon; 02-22-2008 at 08:55 PM.
#26
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,049
I understand your concerns and can accept respectfully walking away.
One question, how do you protect your DC-9 pilots without a merger? What protection do they have now? Compass and Mesaba?
The plan to put several thousand ER, 767, 757 and MD88/90 pilots below them sure isn't acceptable either.
Doug Steenland gets to keep his job and I get to keep mine - what a deal.
One question, how do you protect your DC-9 pilots without a merger? What protection do they have now? Compass and Mesaba?
The plan to put several thousand ER, 767, 757 and MD88/90 pilots below them sure isn't acceptable either.
Doug Steenland gets to keep his job and I get to keep mine - what a deal.
Last edited by Bucking Bar; 02-22-2008 at 09:26 PM.
#27
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,049
Northwest Airlines Corp. pilots have integration issues to sort out. Not just the ones with their counterparts at Delta Air Lines Inc. that threaten to scuttle talks to combine the two carriers. The ones with Republic Airlines. From 1986.
#28
I understand your concerns and can accept respectfully walking away.
One question, how do you protect your DC-9 pilots without a merger? What protection do they have now? Compass and Mesaba?
The plan to put several thousand ER, 767, 757 and MD88/90 pilots below them sure isn't acceptable either. The NWA pilots over-played their hand, I think the deal is off.
One question, how do you protect your DC-9 pilots without a merger? What protection do they have now? Compass and Mesaba?
The plan to put several thousand ER, 767, 757 and MD88/90 pilots below them sure isn't acceptable either. The NWA pilots over-played their hand, I think the deal is off.
Thanks for your concern for NWA DC-9 pilots Bar, but we will be ok. Our DC-9 pilots are DC-9 pilots because they want to be. I have flown with new hires who are on their way to the 747 (s/o) and 320 (FO).
If you are looking at the same information we are, you know that NWA has plently of cash to buy whatever airplanes they want to. There is no need for shrinkage. I think we just are rich in the understanding that any airplane NWA has is not ours as pilots. All we do is fly them. I guess we are not as lucky as you at DAL, where they buy airplanes just so you can fly them. (Or, "invest in their pilots", as you said on another thread)
Understand that the only reason I jump on your posts is that they all seem to indicate that you feel that everyone should be honored to fly for Delta Airlines and jump for joy at the prospects of flying a 767 with a double breasted suit jacket hanging in the closet behind you.
Overplayed our hand? Do you know what our -400's do? Have you been to Narita? Amsterdam? Delta is not the only airline that fly's international. I think our hands are just fine without the coat.
New K Now
#29
[quote=Bucking Bar;325838 The NWA pilots over-played their hand, I think the deal is off.[/quote]
Relax, it's not over yet. Management hasn't even issued any deadlines or threats. In order for both sides to get their best deal, it'll have to go down to the wire - no different than contract time.
Relax, it's not over yet. Management hasn't even issued any deadlines or threats. In order for both sides to get their best deal, it'll have to go down to the wire - no different than contract time.
#30
Banned
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,480
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JohnnyCochran
Regional
4
09-13-2007 06:57 AM