Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

DL International Cuts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-17-2015, 12:50 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 403
Default DL International Cuts

More international cuts coming for Delta this fall than those typical for the shoulder months. Do we think it is...

Lower fuel prices making more people drive on their international trips? (That's what the press release said). Sounds fishy. Or...

The ME3 starting to beat us? Or...

Our codeshare partners driving through the holes in our scope clause?

Those wide body cuts are going to hurt even with the hiring and retirements. Hope this is being considered by our negotiators.
FlyZ is offline  
Old 04-17-2015, 01:02 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Trip7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,660
Default

Strength of the dollar affecting yields
Trip7 is offline  
Old 04-17-2015, 03:00 PM
  #3  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

It's not so much route cancellations as down gauging. That has mostly already been announced with the retirement of 3 more whales and their replacement by A330 IGWs.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 04-17-2015, 04:05 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: 7ERA
Posts: 1,236
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
Strength of the dollar affecting yields
Hmm, wonder why UAL and AA are not pulling back.
Xray678 is offline  
Old 04-17-2015, 04:24 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CGfalconHerc's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Position: DAL A320 CA
Posts: 559
Default

Originally Posted by FlyZ
More international cuts coming for Delta this fall than those typical for the shoulder months. Do we think it is...

Lower fuel prices making more people drive on their international trips? (That's what the press release said). Sounds fishy. Or...

The ME3 starting to beat us? Or...

Our codeshare partners driving through the holes in our scope clause?

Those wide body cuts are going to hurt even with the hiring and retirements. Hope this is being considered by our negotiators.
Oh no..stand by for incoming!

Que Pelican and Cricket in 3...2...1..
CGfalconHerc is offline  
Old 04-17-2015, 04:26 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 276
Default

I pray DAL doesn't become a Domestic Airline....
thefoxsays is offline  
Old 04-17-2015, 04:41 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Trip7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,660
Default

Originally Posted by Xray678
Hmm, wonder why UAL and AA are not pulling back.
Check back after they announce their quarterly earnings
Trip7 is offline  
Old 04-17-2015, 04:51 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

I think this is part of the "capacity dicipline" craze from several years ago that many on wall st view as the catalyst for the numbers being put up now, and partially for good reason in that limited context. It is not, however, an endless well any airline can go to in order to print money. Articles on the subject have called this latest round "music to their ears" referring to investors, or more likely analcysts that aren't even invested but wanting street cred by seeing if they can get companies to do whatever they pontificate they should do.

Things seem to be going so well that there is a fear of missing ever increasing expectations or upsetting the analcysts. But capacity dicipline only works if everyone else participates and it can't work forever in any case; its not a sustainable long term strategy at all. If ME3 keep barfing super jumbos into markets where others are trying to keep profitable with capacity cuts, those cuts will backfire big time on DL and any other US airlines that try them. Soon US airlines will have no choice but to either retreat and shrink into insignificance or slug it out with the dual subsidized fake royal capacity dumpers. Either way will be very costly, but fighting them while we're healthy enough to do it at least gives us a chance to win. Letting them poach our networks on their terms is extremely unsustainable.

We will see a similar, though less financially severe, battle heat up on the domestic side of things as well. The endless growth mode so called LCC's will never stop dumping capacity and trashing yields, no matter what the big 3/4 try to do to bolster the industry. The days of gifting capacity to whoever wants it to please the analcysts is going to rapidly lose its luster on wall st.
gloopy is offline  
Old 04-17-2015, 04:55 PM
  #9  
Not retiring avatar
 
Monkeyfly's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Position: 777 CAP
Posts: 771
Default

Originally Posted by Xray678
Hmm, wonder why UAL and AA are not pulling back.
Just wait...
Monkeyfly is offline  
Old 04-17-2015, 05:18 PM
  #10  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
I think this is part of the "capacity dicipline" craze from several years ago that many on wall st view as the catalyst for the numbers being put up now, and partially for good reason in that limited context. It is not, however, an endless well any airline can go to in order to print money. Articles on the subject have called this latest round "music to their ears" referring to investors, or more likely analcysts that aren't even invested but wanting street cred by seeing if they can get companies to do whatever they pontificate they should do.

Things seem to be going so well that there is a fear of missing ever increasing expectations or upsetting the analcysts. But capacity dicipline only works if everyone else participates and it can't work forever in any case; its not a sustainable long term strategy at all. If ME3 keep barfing super jumbos into markets where others are trying to keep profitable with capacity cuts, those cuts will backfire big time on DL and any other US airlines that try them. Soon US airlines will have no choice but to either retreat and shrink into insignificance or slug it out with the dual subsidized fake royal capacity dumpers. Either way will be very costly, but fighting them while we're healthy enough to do it at least gives us a chance to win. Letting them poach our networks on their terms is extremely unsustainable.

We will see a similar, though less financially severe, battle heat up on the domestic side of things as well. The endless growth mode so called LCC's will never stop dumping capacity and trashing yields, no matter what the big 3/4 try to do to bolster the industry. The days of gifting capacity to whoever wants it to please the analcysts is going to rapidly lose its luster on wall st.
I think this has more to do with our recent agreement to allow management out of their requirement to fly a set number of flights out of NRT. For allowing management out of that requirement we "got" a minimum level of Pacific ASM's that must be flown by Delta pilots. That new minimum level represented about 10% less ASM's than what we were currently flying. What we're seeing now is simply what we've allowed management to shrink to...while keeping all their Joint Ventures and code shares.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sniper
Major
3
02-09-2012 09:54 PM
DLax85
Cargo
18
04-09-2010 10:03 AM
skytrekker
Major
1
02-18-2008 03:16 PM
Sir James
Major
0
09-23-2005 10:21 AM
SWAjet
Major
0
05-31-2005 10:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices