Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta 30 Gates In SEA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-05-2014, 04:42 AM
  #251  
Runs with scissors
 
Timbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,730
Default

Originally Posted by Pelican
Actually he decided to do it with Alaska remember? It was only after BT told him thanks but no thanks that he decided to go with Skywest and evidently eventually with DAL mainline. I only bring this up as a reminder that he is upper management, just like your counterparts on here warned us about BT only being concerned about padding his pocket & not giving a crap about pilots. I assure you, RA is NOT increasing your flying because he wants his pilots to have great upward mobility & live happily ever after. He actually wanted me flying your international feed, not you.
I think RA really wanted to merge with Alaska, eliminate a competitor and lock in feed, not just code share. Now it looks like he will buy Hawaiian. Got plenty of money to do it now...but no money to restore pilot pay and retirements to decade old levels.
Timbo is offline  
Old 12-05-2014, 05:03 AM
  #252  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
I think RA really wanted to merge with Alaska, eliminate a competitor and lock in feed, not just code share. Now it looks like he will buy Hawaiian. Got plenty of money to do it now...but no money to restore pilot pay and retirements to decade old levels.
Our "union" has gotta ask for it first Timbo. What do you think the odds are of that happening?

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 12-05-2014, 05:34 AM
  #253  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TheManager's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,503
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
I think RA really wanted to merge with Alaska, eliminate a competitor and lock in feed, not just code share. Now it looks like he will buy Hawaiian. Got plenty of money to do it now...but no money to restore pilot pay and retirements to decade old levels.
Winner. Their stock is on a tear. Check out the nice gap up

Reduces profit sharing too.



http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=HA&...d=p81494084570
TheManager is offline  
Old 12-05-2014, 05:37 AM
  #254  
Gets Weekends Off
 
shiznit's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: right for a long, long time
Posts: 2,642
Default

Originally Posted by TheManager
Winner. Their stock is on a tear. Check out the nice gap up

Reduces profit sharing too.

Incorrect on the profit sharing calculation. It is based off of PTIX excluding one-time items, not net profit. "Profit-sharing" is a misnomer.
shiznit is offline  
Old 12-05-2014, 05:56 AM
  #255  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 51
Default

Originally Posted by siuflightboy
Well, it is cooler than wearing a santa hat during your walkaround.
No, no it's not. There is nothing cool about the double breasted jacket and I wear one to work...
tonyp is offline  
Old 12-05-2014, 06:22 AM
  #256  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TheManager's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,503
Default

Originally Posted by shiznit
Incorrect on the profit sharing calculation. It is based off of PTIX excluding one-time items, not net profit. "Profit-sharing" is a misnomer.

I'm familiar with this:


DEFINITION OF 'PRETAX OPERATING INCOME - PTOI'
An accounting term that refers to the difference between a company's operating revenues (from its primary businesses) and its direct expenses (except taxes) tied to those revenues. Pretax operating income excludes non-operating forms of revenue and non-recurring transactions such as capital gains on assets and profits from unrelated investments in other companies (unless its main business is investment in other companies).

Not so familiar with "PTIX"

Explain?
TheManager is offline  
Old 12-05-2014, 06:43 AM
  #257  
Gets Weekends Off
 
shiznit's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: right for a long, long time
Posts: 2,642
Default

Originally Posted by TheManager
I'm familiar with this:


DEFINITION OF 'PRETAX OPERATING INCOME - PTOI'
An accounting term that refers to the difference between a company's operating revenues (from its primary businesses) and its direct expenses (except taxes) tied to those revenues. Pretax operating income excludes non-operating forms of revenue and non-recurring transactions such as capital gains on assets and profits from unrelated investments in other companies (unless its main business is investment in other companies).

Not so familiar with "PTIX"

Explain?
PWA 2.A.207:

“Pre-tax income” (PTIX) means, for any calendar year, the Company’s consolidated pretax income calculated in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States and as reported in the Company’s public securities filings but excluding: a) all asset write downs related to long term assets, b) gains or losses with respect to employee equity securities, c) gains or losses with respect to extraordinary one-time or non-recurring events (including without limitation one-time transition or integration costs incurred in connection with the merger of the Company and Northwest Airlines Corporation during the two year period following the merger), and d) expense accrued with respect to the profit sharing plan.

PWA 3.I "Profit Sharing Plan"

describes the calculation, and uses this PTIX definition
shiznit is offline  
Old 12-05-2014, 07:35 AM
  #258  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
I think RA really wanted to merge with Alaska, eliminate a competitor and lock in feed, not just code share. Now it looks like he will buy Hawaiian.
I thought that too until I looked at the big numbers. They are a good plug and play from a network perspective and they have a common enough fleet, although DL likes the 330-300 a LOT more than the -200. The -300 is a great money maker, but the -200 is largely a marketing/nework liability and one of the least profitable sub-fleet types for many market for much of the time.

While that could easily be dealt with, the fact remains that they have a LOT of debt. Run the numbers and adjust for size/market cap and you will see that for their size their debt is absolutely staggering. It would be the equivalent of DL having 70-80B in debt.

They are incredibly expensive from that point of view and for the price they don't bring anything to the table DL couldn't do itself for far, far less except that one or two NRT slots and that ain't worth the price by a long shot. I'd love to see their network added to ours, but I don't think its going to happen because the sheer economics of scale are way out of balance.
gloopy is offline  
Old 12-05-2014, 09:37 AM
  #259  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Hillbilly's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Position: 7ERA
Posts: 950
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
I thought that too until I looked at the big numbers. They are a good plug and play from a network perspective and they have a common enough fleet, although DL likes the 330-300 a LOT more than the -200. The -300 is a great money maker, but the -200 is largely a marketing/nework liability and one of the least profitable sub-fleet types for many market for much of the time.

While that could easily be dealt with, the fact remains that they have a LOT of debt. Run the numbers and adjust for size/market cap and you will see that for their size their debt is absolutely staggering. It would be the equivalent of DL having 70-80B in debt.

They are incredibly expensive from that point of view and for the price they don't bring anything to the table DL couldn't do itself for far, far less except that one or two NRT slots and that ain't worth the price by a long shot. I'd love to see their network added to ours, but I don't think its going to happen because the sheer economics of scale are way out of balance.
Bingo! Absorbing them is completely counter to Delta's hyper focus on reducing debt. For what they make, their debt is really high and, if what I've heard is correct, I'm pretty sure we don't want anyone's A330-200s so we could lose more money on more routes. The -300s and 717s are a different story, but I don't think it is viewed as a viable option at this time.
Hillbilly is offline  
Old 12-05-2014, 10:20 AM
  #260  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Posts: 3,655
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
I thought that too until I looked at the big numbers. They are a good plug and play from a network perspective and they have a common enough fleet, although DL likes the 330-300 a LOT more than the -200. The -300 is a great money maker, but the -200 is largely a marketing/nework liability and one of the least profitable sub-fleet types for many market for much of the time.

While that could easily be dealt with, the fact remains that they have a LOT of debt. Run the numbers and adjust for size/market cap and you will see that for their size their debt is absolutely staggering. It would be the equivalent of DL having 70-80B in debt.

They are incredibly expensive from that point of view and for the price they don't bring anything to the table DL couldn't do itself for far, far less except that one or two NRT slots and that ain't worth the price by a long shot. I'd love to see their network added to ours, but I don't think its going to happen because the sheer economics of scale are way out of balance.
Gloopy,
Are you referring to their Haneda slots? I didn't think they even fly to NRT.
But the fact remains I agree with your assessment, other than picking up equip at fire sale prices if something were to go south in the industry, there is nothing in their network that couldn't be duplicated if it were worth the capital expenditure.
They are firmly rooted in Hawaii which is predominately an economy based on tourism and government/military. Both of which have a low rate of premium price ticket purchase. Very low margins for the long distances they have to cover.
They are good at what they do, offer a "hawaiian" way to begin and end your vacation to Hawaii, but as far as taking on that level of debt for the expected ROI, it does seem illogical without some other undisclosed factor.
LUV
full of luv is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
wannabepilot
Flight Schools and Training
34
07-07-2008 12:15 PM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices