Search

Notices

Details on Delta TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-04-2014, 06:54 AM
  #1421  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Who's mouthpiece are you?
I don't know for sure whether management wants CDO's or not. I suspect they do.

There was someone on here earlier posted that he had flown with SD and that SD really wanted them. Coupled with the staunch DALPA aficionados (who are normally in lock step with whatever management wants) still pounding their arguments in support of CDO's, it sure makes me think this issue is not dead.
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Old 09-04-2014, 07:04 AM
  #1422  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
I don't know for sure whether management wants CDO's or not. I suspect they do.

There was someone on here earlier posted that he had flown with SD and that SD really wanted them. Coupled with the staunch DALPA aficionados (who are normally in lock step with whatever management wants) still pounding their arguments in support of CDO's, it sure makes me think this issue is not dead.
I'll gladly give them CDOs, but my restrictions would be so onerous they wouldn't want them. 6 hours (non reduceable... ever) behind the door for starters, 10:30 pay... little things like that. Then sailing and all the senior bubbas can fly them to their hearts' content.
tsquare is offline  
Old 09-04-2014, 07:27 AM
  #1423  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Who's mouthpiece are you?

John Malone's.
gzsg is offline  
Old 09-04-2014, 07:29 AM
  #1424  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
I don't know for sure whether management wants CDO's or not. I suspect they do.

There was someone on here earlier posted that he had flown with SD and that SD really wanted them. Coupled with the staunch DALPA aficionados (who are normally in lock step with whatever management wants) still pounding their arguments in support of CDO's, it sure makes me think this issue is not dead.
The fact that they were on the survey says it all. Done deal.
gzsg is offline  
Old 09-04-2014, 07:30 AM
  #1425  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
I'll gladly give them CDOs, but my restrictions would be so onerous they wouldn't want them. 6 hours (non reduceable... ever) behind the door for starters, 10:30 pay... little things like that. Then sailing and all the senior bubbas can fly them to their hearts' content.
Yeah, I might could live with that. Hopefully, like you say, management couldn't and then we would be done with the consideration of these horrid things once and for all. I'd also have to have the restriction where no one who didn't want to fly one of these had to. Maybe some kind of opt-in system where if you didn't opt-in then you couldn't be assigned one, even on reserve. And then of course I'd have to check early morning flights before nonreving. That would eliminate some of the nonrev benefit for me. Anyway, as long as I don't have to fly them and I don't have to ride in the back of an airplane with someone flying that morning flight after a CDO... I guess I'm good with it. But then again, I remember how devastating it was when I was at TWA and we lost an airplane full of people... Oh, and I'd also want to not be required to DH on an early morning flight flown by a CDO crew. Actually, the more I think about it... I'm still against them.

Last edited by DAL 88 Driver; 09-04-2014 at 07:43 AM.
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Old 09-04-2014, 07:35 AM
  #1426  
Works Every Weekend
 
Check Essential's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 737 ATL
Posts: 3,506
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
In actuality, what was occurring was that pilots were there flying full schedules for 3 months and then sitting around for 9 months collecting reserve guarantee as excess. That is where the savings were.

As we have grown flying time, we went from a huge pilot surplus to a measurable pilot shortage. That is what is causing people to feel more flying over this summer. It has nothing to do with work rule changes,
Can't agree with that opinion. We have always been short of pilots in the summer.
Nothing new about that.

I think the main reason people "feel more flying over this summer" has everything to do with work rule changes. ---> We gave management a gigantic productivity concession when we turned July and August into 30 day months. Along with the higher ALVs, now they can cram more flight hours into fewer days.

July and August have always been the limiting factor at this airline. We gave that away for way too cheap.
Check Essential is offline  
Old 09-04-2014, 07:36 AM
  #1427  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Default

CDOs will be back. Slighty better. The insiders know the pilots dont want them so they will sneak it in C2015.

Stock, stock options. No thank you.
gzsg is offline  
Old 09-04-2014, 07:54 AM
  #1428  
Works Every Weekend
 
Check Essential's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 737 ATL
Posts: 3,506
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
If we reduce profit sharing it is game over. C2015 will be a repeat of C2012 and completely cost neutral. If we can hold the line and keep profit sharing, we cannot fail.

The most important part of your survey is to protect profit sharing and move it off the table.

Jerry
Originally Posted by gzsg
Stock, stock options. No thank you.
Those two positions seem somewhat inconsistent.

Profit sharing and stock options are both forms of compensation that is "at risk" based on the company's performance.
Why is profit sharing so good but stock options are bad?
Check Essential is offline  
Old 09-04-2014, 07:55 AM
  #1429  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: Decoupled
Posts: 922
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
I have those same worthless stock options you are talking about. I remember them touting the Black Scholes model and how DAL stock was on the way up, yada yada yada... but we now know that the B/S (interesting contraction I see now that I write it) was flawed. But..... and I am not necessarily advocating it... if we got options placed into a trading account that were immediately tradeable, I'd jump on that in a heartbeat.
If that happened, DALPA would hold back the stock, hire someone to try to sell the stock as a block, wait for the price to go to a historic low before releasing the stock.... Nah, that would never happen.

Let's just stay away from stock. Put it in my paycheck every month, month in, month out. Let Dick and Eddie play that game.

(I thought the B/S was a pretty good descriptor, too)
orvil is offline  
Old 09-04-2014, 07:56 AM
  #1430  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: Decoupled
Posts: 922
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential
Those two positions seem somewhat inconsistent.

Profit sharing and stock options are both forms of compensation that is "at risk" based on the company's performance.
Why is profit sharing so good but stock options are bad?
Both are bad. Paychecks are good. It's pretty simple.
orvil is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10671
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
INAV8OR
Mergers and Acquisitions
66
05-15-2008 04:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices