Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
AMR pilots warn management >

AMR pilots warn management

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

AMR pilots warn management

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-10-2006, 09:00 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Position: 737 Capt
Posts: 219
Default AMR pilots warn management

Pilots warn American on China

Union wants improved contract before OK'ing coveted new route

11:15 PM CST on Friday, November 10, 2006

By TERRY MAXON / The Dallas Morning News

The union representing American Airlines Inc. pilots has warned management that the airline may not get the union's OK to fly a coveted China route if the company doesn't reward pilots in return.

The Allied Pilots Association "has informed management that when the pilots see some immediate improvements to our contract, we will enthusiastically support new long-haul flying," APA's national leadership said in a message sent to members.

An American spokesman declined to comment Friday on the union's position. A union spokesman said the union expects to present a proposal to management soon.

The flights would exceed the maximum time on duty permitted in the pilots' contract and would require the union to make an exception, as it did last year when American began flying between Chicago and New Delhi.

American, which wants to fly between Dallas/Fort Worth and Beijing is competing against applications from United Airlines Inc., Continental Airlines Inc. and Northwest Airlines Inc. for new routes between the United States and China.

Earlier this week, Northwest and United issued news releases saying that their labor groups backed their applications and that they had no contractual issues barring the operation of their new service.

The union leaders said American's management has "expended vast resources to lobby and gain the favor" of the U.S. Department of Transportation to win the Beijing route, but "they have completely ignored the pilots' legitimate expectations."

In the short term, the new route would only reallocate resources from one route to another with little real benefit to American's pilots, although flying to China offers "strategic opportunities" longer term, the Allied Pilots said.

"Management must now decide whether they value our participation, or if they would rather sacrifice a coveted route award in the pursuit of a misguided labor strategy," the memo said.

The comments on the China route were contained in a longer message detailing the pilots' objectives in current contract talks, with president Ralph Hunter and the other two union leaders repeatedly saying that the union will demand that its members "get our money back."

The union agreed to an estimated $660 million in pay cuts and other concessions in 2003 to help American avoid bankruptcy. Union leaders have pointed to management pay raises and nearly $100 million in executive payouts this year as evidence that American can afford to raise pilot salaries.
Gordon C is offline  
Old 11-10-2006, 09:05 PM
  #2  
New boss = Old boss
 
mike734's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: Ca B737
Posts: 2,762
Default

Got to use any leverage you can. Good luck to them.
mike734 is offline  
Old 11-11-2006, 07:34 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ryane946's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: FO, looking left
Posts: 1,060
Default

Way to go American pilots. I read the two press releaases earlier in the week from Northwest and United pilots and I was wondering why pilots would not appprove the new routes. It seems like it would be more opportunity and more revenue possiblity for their respective airline. But I think it is awesome that American pilots are taking a stand.



I would bet $20 that the route will go to United. I have read so much about the fight over this route. CAL's EWR-Beijing is from New York which already has plenty of service, and will be operated using smaller 777's. Northwest is projecting the least amount of demand for their DTW-Beijing route. American needs to have their pilots approve it. Their route from DFW-Beijing is also predicted to have less demand, and is flown on smaller 777's.

My bet is United will get it because they have really been pushing the capitol to capitol service. IAD-Beijing has the most projected demand. It will be flown on the largest aircraft 747-400 with the most first/business seats. Their pilots have approved it. But I think the capitol to capitol argument will win United the route.
ryane946 is offline  
Old 11-11-2006, 10:01 AM
  #4  
Freightmama!
 
Freightpuppy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 757/767 FO
Posts: 2,880
Default

I'm sure management will find a way to blackmail the pilots.
Freightpuppy is offline  
Old 11-11-2006, 10:13 AM
  #5  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: A-320
Posts: 6,929
Default

Hey Freightpuppy, is it really true do you really fly all over the WORLD wow hehe
JoeyMeatballs is offline  
Old 11-11-2006, 10:17 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
favila008's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 297
Default

Good job! American Airline Pilos, everything will come back, slowly, but it will come back.
favila008 is offline  
Old 11-11-2006, 10:27 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HotMamaPilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: FO - 757/767
Posts: 1,228
Default

Originally Posted by favila008
Good job! American Airline Pilos, everything will come back, slowly, but it will come back.
Kudos to AA pilots. Also, kudos on being the only legacy to not give in to bankruptcy or the 50 seat scope clause(maybe CAL too???). anyway, if all pilot groups stuck to their guns, the RJ would not stand for "replacement jet"
HotMamaPilot is offline  
Old 11-11-2006, 11:10 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
saab2000's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,750
Default

Originally Posted by HotMamaPilot
Kudos to AA pilots. Also, kudos on being the only legacy to not give in to bankruptcy or the 50 seat scope clause(maybe CAL too???). anyway, if all pilot groups stuck to their guns, the RJ would not stand for "replacement jet"


What does this have to do with RJs? Flights between the US and China will not be flown by RJs.

(FWIW, I agree with your sentiments and think that they should be limited to 50-69 seats (maybe 69 seats, but probably 50) and not used only to replace most 'mainline' service - only where it really makes sense. But don't try to blame everything that is wrong with this industry on RJs.)
saab2000 is offline  
Old 11-11-2006, 11:44 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: retired
Posts: 567
Default

946,
The NWA route request is Shanghai not Beijing.
filejw is offline  
Old 11-11-2006, 11:49 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Retired
Posts: 3,717
Default

Originally Posted by filejw
946,
The NWA route request is Shanghai not Beijing.
Even better! There are very few good massage parlors in Beijing, being as it's still sort of a communistic place. Whereas Shanghi is wonderful.
Jetjok is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nw320driver
Foreign
35
10-15-2010 07:41 PM
fireman0174
Major
46
11-19-2006 05:49 AM
nw320driver
Major
15
11-17-2006 07:45 AM
HSLD
Flight Schools and Training
2
05-14-2006 09:07 AM
RockBottom
Major
0
04-29-2005 07:26 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices